Issue40,科学研究的目的，第三次头晕眼花中
Issue40Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem.
提纲：
1.不同意，应当更看重对于社会的贡献
2.是其义务
3.兴趣也很重要
4.如果只重兴趣
5.总结
Such a topic reminds me to take a look around the world we are living in nowadays, and what I find is that lives more convenient than ever before are largely based on the contributions of numerous scholars and researchers' work. Do or did they do these all only for their interests as stated above? Somewhat, I do prefer an opposite view that scholars and researchers should concentrate mostly on the larger society rather than their individual interests.
Primarily, standing on the top floor of the pyramid of mankind intellect, scientists have the obligation to advance the human beings' civilization by exerting their special knowledge. First, what cannot be denied is that almost all kinds of science and technologies were born spontaneously or intentionally as a result of the mankind's survival needs, namely, the benefits of the whole society, which are both material and spiritual, not merely of interests. Second, scholars and researchers, who are piths of the society and have mastered the most advanced knowledge, are the only ones able to impulse the mankind civilization forth. Since human beings are still suffering for so many causes, it is necessary for them to concentrate on whether their work can do help with these problems and then make a contribution to the larger society. For instance, in the angle of physic, some diseases like ADIS and Ebola are still out of control; from the living aspect, inventions are far away to meet the needs of daily life. Otherwise scholars would be condemned as selfish and incorrect if their work has nothing to do with the society benefit.
Admittedly, interests play a significant role in scholars and researchers work, which would appeal people to take the sake both enthusiastically and devotedly. In lack of interests at the beginning and during the process, scientists would not even launch a subject, no more talking engaging in it. Edison to be a great inventor is surely linked with his interests with DIY when he was still young, and so did Bill Gates, whose MicroSoft have transformed the whole world, have especial curiosity on computer operating system. It is easy to see the effect of interests on spurring people up when facing difficulties and on directing them ponder further.
However, though to some extent, scientists' work are pursued for their interests, to over accentuate it and put the contribution to the larger society aside would be a regretful choice, especially when their interests are overwhelmingly idiosyncratic and beyond the normal scale, for such risky interests might lead to severe results. A brutal example will be exhibited as following. During the Second World War, Japanese biochemists, who were serving for the army, established several laboratories in the Northeast of China, where they applied bacterial and extreme condition (such as extremely hot or cold) experiments to alive Chinese captives. Should these immoral and inhumane studies be developed for the interests of scientist? Also, today there are some independent scholars are studying on clone technology on human body. But before it is proven harmless to human bodies and the latent ethnic problems are solved, the research should be prohibited.
In conclusion, scholars and researchers should not carry out their studies only for chasing their own interests, by doing which they may drive human beings into danger in some cases. That should be more taken into account that whether the larger society would benefit from their researches since scientists are the hope for a promising tomorrow of mankind.(578 words) 忘了说，又是一个半小时才写完的。立场和kavent不一样。 存下来，和Kavent的一并看，呵呵！ 占个座吧
我的脑袋要炸开了…… 先占个座，晚上回来改。 up一个
今天帖子沉得太快了，已经到第4页去啦！~~~挖坑的人们快还债，西西，我是当代黄世仁:)
也欢迎新人挖新坑 ;) 731部队的例子明显不成立，本来是为部队服务的怎么可以用在这里 开头不错，很自然！
逻辑架构清析，驳——让——驳！
但第二次驳的例子，731不太合适，如7楼所说！
写的不错，向你学习！ 很棒.我想问个问题，究竟现在我们联系是实打实的恰时间好，还是任由我们发挥,for instance,楼主写了90分钟，这样会不会对我们考试时候有负面影响。 55555,我快要感动死了，有人夸我的椰树了！也很惊讶！
90分钟当然对考试有很大的影响，因为我还是新手，所以先放开了写，主要要把握住结构。正在拼命努力缩短时间中！
写的时候我现在还会查一查字典，//blush
不过我想多积累几篇，每个大类都有自己用熟了的例子，自己再多修改自己的文章，应该到时候可以解决写例子不会写词的问题。
非常感谢大家的指点！731的例子我现在也觉得有点问题，应该更多的考虑科学家的个性所导致的研究方向，可能为了什么服务的例子就不合适了。
谢谢鼓励！ 记得有人数ets批评过在issue 文章中出现Such a topic，this topic, the speaker 的字眼？？ Such a topic reminds me to take a look around the world we are living in nowadays, and what I find is that livesbeing more convenient than ever before are largely based on the contributions of numerous scholars and researchers' work. Do or did they do these all only for their interests as stated above? Somewhat, I do prefer an opposite view that scholars and researchers should concentrate mostly on the larger society rather than their individual interests.
Primarily, standing on the top floorsummit,金字塔还有floor呀？ of the pyramid of mankind intellect, scientists have the obligation to advance the human beings'去掉human being civilization by exertingexert knowledge? their special knowledge. First, what cannot be denied is that almost all kinds of science and technologies were born spontaneously or intentionally as a result of the mankind's survival needs, namely, the benefits of the whole society, which are both material and spiritual, not merely of interests. Second, scholars and researchers, who are piths of the society and have mastered the most advanced knowledge, are the only ones able to impulse the mankind civilization forthI don’t think so. Since human beings are still suffering for so many causes, it is necessary for them to concentrate on whether their work can do help with these problems and then make a contribution to the larger society. For instance, in the angle of physic, some diseases like ADISAIDS and Ebola are still out of control; from the living aspects, inventions are far away to meet the needs of daily life. Otherwise scholars would be condemned as selfish and incorrect if their work has nothing to do with the society benefit.这句话好像总结得轻了
Admittedly, interests play a significant role in scholars and researchers work, which would appeal people to take the sake both enthusiastically and devotedly. In lack of interests at the beginning and during the process, scientists would not even launch a subject, no more talking engaging in it. Edison to be a great inventor is surely linked with his interests with DIY when he was still young, and so did Bill Gates, whose MicroSoft have transformed the whole world, have especial curiosity on computer operating system. It is easy to see the effect of interests on spurring people up when facing difficulties and on directing them ponder further.这段对你的论点好像没有帮助
However, though去掉 to some extent, scientists' work are pursued for their interests, to over accentuate it and put the contribution to the larger society aside would be a regretful choice, especially when their interests are overwhelmingly idiosyncratic and beyond the normal scale, for such risky interests might lead to severe results. A brutal example will be exhibited as following. During the Second World War, Japanese biochemists, who were serving for the army, established several laboratories in the Northeast of China, where they applied bacterial and extreme condition (such as extremely hot or cold) experiments to alive Chinese captives.这个例子不太恰当 Should these immoral and inhumane studies be developed for the interests of scientist? Also, today there are some independent scholars are studying on clone technology on human body. But before it is proven harmless to human bodies and the latent ethnic problems are solved, the research should be prohibited.
In conclusion, scholars and researchers should not carry out their studies only for chasing their own interests, by doing which they may drive human beings into danger in some cases. Thatit should be more taken into account that whether the larger society would benefit from their researches since scientists are the hope for a promising tomorrow of mankind.(578 words)
第一个body起点很好，落脚点居然到了selfish上，呵呵。第二个body没有帮助，偶觉得~
早上起来改的，脑袋还有点晕，说的不对的不好意思啊~ Such a topic reminds me to take a look around the world we are living in nowadays, and what I find is that lives more convenient than ever before are largely based on the contributions of numerous scholars and researchers' work. Do or did they do these all only for their interests as stated above? Somewhat, I do prefer an opposite view that scholars and researchers should concentrate mostly on the larger society rather than their individual interests.
Primarily, standing on the top floor of the pyramid of mankind intellect, scientists have the obligation to advance the human beings' civilization by exerting their special knowledge. First, what cannot be denied is that almost all kinds of science and technologies were born spontaneously or intentionally as a result of the mankind's survival needs, namely, the benefits of the whole society, which are both material and spiritual, not merely of interests. Second, scholars and researchers, who are piths of the society and have mastered the most advanced knowledge, are the only [太绝对，main power to……] ones able to impulse the mankind civilization forth. Since human beings are still suffering for so many causes, it is necessary for them to concentrate on whether their work can do help with these problems and then make a contribution to the larger society. For instance, in the angle of physic [汗，身为医学生的我竟然不知道这是医学的意思。不过还是建议你用medicine，万一判卷官也不认识呢？], some diseases like ADIS and Ebola [这好像是一种病毒，而不是疾病吧] are still out of control; from the living aspect, inventions are far away to meet the needs of daily life. Otherwise scholars would be condemned as selfish and incorrect if their work has nothing to do with the society benefit.
Admittedly, interests play a significant role in scholars and researchers work, which would appeal people to take the sake both enthusiastically and devotedly. In lack of interests at the beginning and during the process, scientists would not even launch a subject, no more talking engaging in it. Edison to be a great inventor is surely linked with his interests with DIY when he was still young, [我认为这里应该断句了] and so did Bill Gates, whose MicroSoft have transformed the whole world, have especial [我只见过especially，呵呵] curiosity on computer operating system. It is easy to see the effect of interests on spurring people up when facing difficulties and on directing them ponder further.[这里好像又提出了一个很好的分论点，可惜没有论证。]
However, though to some extent, scientists' work are pursued for their interests, to over accentuate it and put the contribution to the larger society aside would be a regretful choice, especially when their interests are overwhelmingly idiosyncratic and beyond the normal scale, for such risky interests might lead to severe results. A brutal example will be exhibited as following. During the Second World War, Japanese biochemists, who were serving for the army, established several laboratories in the Northeast of China, where they applied bacterial and extreme condition (such as extremely hot or cold) experiments to alive Chinese captives. Should these immoral and inhumane studies be developed for the interests of scientist? Also, today there are some independent scholars are studying on clone technology on human body. But before it is proven harmless to human bodies and the latent ethnic problems are solved, the research should be prohibited.
In conclusion, scholars and researchers should not carry out their studies only for chasing their own interests, by doing which they may drive human beings into danger in some cases. That should be more taken into account that whether the larger society would benefit from their researches since scientists are the hope for a promising tomorrow of mankind. [最后这句是病句](578 words)
现在的帖子怎么沉的这么快，找了好久才找到啊。 谢谢小渔女指点！！！：） Such a topic reminds me to take a look around the world we are living in nowadays, and what I find is that lives more convenient than ever before are largely based on the contributions of numerous scholars and researchers' work. Do or did they do these all only for their interests as stated above? Somewhat, I do prefer an opposite view that scholars and researchers should concentrate mostly on the larger society rather than their individual interests.
Primarily, standing on the top floor (个人以为floor可以去掉)of the pyramid of mankind intellect, scientists have the obligation to advance the human beings' civilization by exerting their special knowledge (是不是professional knowledge会好一点？). First, what cannot be denied is that almost all kinds of science and technologies were born spontaneously or intentionally as a result of the mankind's survival needs, namely, the benefits of the whole society, which are both material and spiritual, not merely of interests. Second, scholars and researchers, who are piths of the society and have mastered the most advanced knowledge, are the only ones able to impulse the mankind civilization forth. Since human beings are still suffering for so many causes, it is necessary for them to concentrate on whether their work can do help with these problems and then make a contribution to the larger society. For instance, in the angle of physic, some diseases like ADIS (我记得艾滋病是AIDS) and Ebola are still out of control; from the living aspect, inventions are far away to meet the needs of daily life.(这些例子似乎只能证明human beings are still suffering，对于为什么it is necessary for them似乎缺乏力度) Otherwise scholars would be condemned as selfish (把消极怠工说成自私是不是有些的不妥) and incorrect if their work has nothing to do with the society benefit.
Admittedly, interests play a significant role in scholars and researchers work, which would appeal people to take the sake both enthusiastically and devotedly. In lack of (有这个用法么，我只知道lack of 和 lack in，献丑了)interests at the beginning and during the process, scientists would not even launch a subject, no more talking engaging in it. Edison to be a great inventor (Edison’s being a great inventor?不知道，呵呵) is surely linked with his interests with DIY when he was still young, and so did Bill Gates, whose Microsoft have transformed the whole world, have especial curiosity on computer operating system. It is easy to see the effect of interests on spurring people up when facing difficulties and on directing them ponder further(direct可以这么用么，要加to吧，不记得了，这一句放在这里更像是提出新的论点而不是在总结，个人感觉).
However, though to some extent, scientists' work are pursued for their interests, to over accentuate it and put the contribution to the larger society aside would be a regretful choice, especially when their interests are overwhelmingly idiosyncratic and beyond the normal scale, for such risky interests might lead to severe (这个词用得好让人怕怕，results out of control 会不会好点？研究一下，大家) results. A brutal example will be exhibited as following. During the Second World War, Japanese biochemists, who were serving for the army, established several laboratories in the Northeast of China, where they applied bacterial and extreme condition (such as extremely hot or cold) experiments to alive Chinese captives. (这个例子实在太糟糕，说得既不准确也不能说明问题，饶恕我的民族主义情绪吧，呵呵) Should these immoral and inhumane studies be developed (only)for the interests of scientist? Also, today there are some independent scholars are studying on clone technology on human body. But before it is proven harmless to human bodies and the latent ethnic problems are solved, the research should be prohibited.(这个例子很好，我觉得完全可以取代上面小鬼子的例子)
In conclusion, scholars and researchers should not carry out their studies only for chasing their own interests, by doing which they may drive human beings into danger in some cases. That(It?) should be more taken into account that(删掉，否则病句了) whether the larger society would benefit from their researches since scientists are the hope for a promising tomorrow of mankind.
开头很不错，至少比我老套的开头强不少，呵呵，中间reasoning的结构也不错，结尾很干净，但第二点似乎对自身论点没什么帮助，另外一些语句还有琢磨之处，个人水平不高，有问题大家一起探讨探讨，也欢迎大家对我的作文多提意见
页:
[1]
2