Issue114，科技进步和人性进步，和狒狒不一样的观点
Issue114 第2篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户 共用时间：87分5秒 343 words
从2004年3月5日11时1分到2004年3月5日12时87分
------题目------
Humanity has made little real progress over the past century or so. Technological innovations have taken place, but the overall condition of humanity is no better. War, violence, and poverty are still with us. Technology cannot change the condition of humanity.
------正文------
1.部分同意
2.写技术对于生活带来的改变
3.对生活的改变不代表对人性的促进
4.人性应当更多的依赖于自省而不是技术革新
5.总结
When one has a look around the world we are living, he/she must be attracted by the better conditions than ever before, which are results of technology revolutions. However, to evaluate the civilization of human beings, there is another significant criterion, humanity, which is easy to be ignored. Technology progress does not come along with an ascent of humanity at all, which means that it is futile in changing the condition of humanity entirely in my opinion.
Admittedly, technology has kept arising up a series of transforms of people's lives. From the first industrial revolution, mankind society was stepping on a development highway. Watt's steamer firstly caused mass transport by ships in west American rivers into reality, following which, trains began to carry people to where they wanted to go freely and conveniently. In 20th century, computer science formed the footstone of communication industry, and now one can talk with whom they like by a cell phone all but everywhere in the world. To be compared with the past days when people used candles, today's life is out of imagination of the ancients. What cannot be denied is that technology is the way by which people are easier to reach a higher living level, and put a possibility before many of them to help others without difficulties.
However, such progresses made by technology cannot represent that of humanity. To only offer ample material and an objective possibility cannot be equal to a reflection of necessary improvement of humanity, which is subjective by contrast. If only people were much more likely to be willing to not only show but act out with the kindness spontaneously, we can draw a conclusion that humanity is improved. But how about the reality? From the aspect of economic, economic globalization has caused an abruptly aggravated polarization of rich and poor. Do the magnates of the transnational corporations care about this case? No. What they have done is only utilizing the cheap labors in the undeveloped countries and depriving the resources by advanced technologies. From the political aspect, conflicts among countries have never stopped. On the contrary, technology progresses do contribute to daily outbursts of wars. Numberless new technologies, such as biochemical weapons and atom bombs, have been used not to save human beings but to kill them instead. What is more, human beings are increasingly eager for instant benefit, neglecting the impact on the offspring and the environment is destroyed seriously by such new technologies. For instance, chemical fertilizers applied do result in the fertile losing of soil. And also, human beings sometimes are becoming more hypocritical with the affluent supplies brought by technologies. Potent countries offer some namely "free" helps to the poor nations, but actually, there are some underground purposes concealed behind such helps, for example, the "dollar diplomacy" advanced by authority of Taiwan to gain supports from the nations in poverty. In brief, there is no inevitable link between the technology progress and that of humanity, and in some cases, the former could make sense even worse.
Accordingly, it should not rely on the technology to improve humanity, which is mainly based on the reflection of people themselves. It was said that people was born with seven sins, which are the nature of them. As being creatures with subjective thoughts, mankind should enhance the sense of identification of those in pains to improve the humanity. Great Jesus is an outstanding exemplar and embodiment of humanity, who is deified by people for his altruism and his determination to be with his people especially in danger. No technology but a daily reflection and deliberation could do help with the humanity improvement by trying to feel others‘ feelings and spur them to handle out their hands to those in need.
In sum, technology is not the elixir for humanity and it cannot change the condition of humanity entirely. With or without technology, people should both notice humanity, a kind of noble nature of human beings, of its existence. Following, efforts should be paid on its improvement, thus, only by doing which, the world could turn into a place more like the heaven, not the Tophet.(691words)
还是一个半小时，实在没有办法了。唉！ NEEDLE，偶就快考了，米虾米时间，就看看你的提纲，偶觉得你可以这样写，技术的作用是什么，技术的进步对人性的进步有什么影响吗？如果没什么的话，应该是什么？（如果字数还不够还可再写写人性到底有没有进步……）这样在发挥一下，就会比较容易多写点吧^^ 个人意见哦~~ 感谢catcat！加油哦！我在Issue上挺没信心也挺没有经验的...谢谢指点！祝你好运！ 恩，偶会努力的熬过最后这两三天啦，现在在忙着搞ARGU 的摸班，水平有限，不用摸班根本写不完……你也加油加油哦~~ up一下吧！也许把humanity误解为人性了，其是应该是人类更准确一些。大家也给看看写法上有没有进步吧！ Needle现在真是高产啊，我来看看~
对了，我早上是不是还占了另一篇的座？要是我忘记填，记得提醒我。 还高产呢，5555，这才是我写的第4棵椰树，结果还跑题。
4滴4滴，你早上挖了一个坑在这里：https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=180037
昨天夜里写的。唉！晚上继续炮制椰树。 needle姐姐~~
我还真不觉得humanity是人类！！
FT…… 狒狒同学，是不是人类我也拿不准。。这一篇已经这么写了，就当作是练习写作手法吧！！
up一个。。。 对哦，GOD，到底是人性还是人类啊，两个意思都有喔……好象又都能说的过去% 无所谓哪个，开头段明确一下你要说的是哪种意思不就完了？ 谢谢美丽莎。感冒好点没，注意休息。
However, to evaluate the civilization of human beings, there is another significant criterion, humanity, which is easy to be ignored.
我开头说了这句话，能不能算限定好了humanity呢？“人类”这个含义是不可能作为人类文明的衡量标准的，这句话中humanity只能理解为“人性”。这样界定之后，全文按照人性的理解来写，可以吗？ 感动，可算不叫美丽杀了！
感冒严重了，5555555555555555555555555555555555
发烧+头疼！
我觉得这句话差不多吧，不过真的太泛泛了，还是不明白到底什么是你想说的humanity，建议给个再明确点的开头。
另外，我的理解差不多就是人性，不过可能英文的含义和中文有差别吧
PS：有空看看我的作文呦！你语言上蛮厉害的 我个人感觉人性本身就是很难定义的。。。。我查查资料看。
美丽莎同学太过奖了。。。我汗ing....
记得看过一篇你的A，很好的。 各位现在写114是不是都跑题啊？？太敏感了？？
我也快考了，4。13的，挺紧张，但也挺盼望！！
好运！！
页:
[1]
2