本帖最后由 dooda 于 2009-12-30 22:52 编辑
Dec 29 2009.
今天的目标是背3个list,看10篇issue 范文,摘录名人名言。
2009-12-29
关于Issue 13, "Many of the world's lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them. The governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from becoming extinct."
阅读了北美范文和网上一个同学的帖子,感觉写的都比我好。字数要突破500。这两篇response 都认为保护小语种在某种程度上说是有必要的,但消除语言障碍和全球化会带来更多好处。政府的角色应该是处理更加迫切的问题,诸如饥饿,无家可归,疾病和文盲等。
----------------------------------------------------------
The speaker asserts that governments of countries where lesser-known languages are
spoken should intervene to prevent these languages from becoming extinct. I agree in so far as a country's indigenous and distinct languages should not be abandoned and forgotten altogether. At some point, however, I think cultural identity should yield to the more practical
considerations of day-to-day life in a global society.(叙述标题观点,表示部分同意 agree in so far as …然而作者认为文化特性应该让路于更加实际的全球化社会)
On the one hand, the indigenous language of any geographical region is part-and-parcel of
the cultural heritage of the region's natives. In my observation we humans have a basic
psychological need for individual identity, which we define by way of our membership in distinct cultural groups. A culture defines itself in various ways--by its unique traditions, rituals, mores, attitudes and beliefs, but especially language. Therefore, when a people's language becomes extinct the result is a diminished sense of pride, dignity, and self- worth.(语言对文化继承很重要,人们基本的心理需要又在文化中定义。所以语言的丢失导致人们自豪感,尊严和自我价值的减少)
One need look no further than continental Europe to observe how people cling tenaciously
to their distinct languages, despite the fact that there is no practical need for them anymore.
And on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, the French Canadians stubbornly insist on French
as their official language, for the sole purpose of preserving their distinct cultural heritage.
Even where no distinct language exists, people will invent one to gain a sense of cultural identity, as the emergence of the distinct Ebonic cant among today's African Americans aptly illustrates. In short, people resist language assimilation because of a basic human need to be
part of a distinct cultural group.(举例说明欧洲大陆和法裔加拿大人坚持他们自己的母语,以及美国的非洲后裔如何创造出自己的黑话来得到文化认同感。The sense of cultural identity.总结,人们拒绝语言同化源于人们想作为某种特有文化组的一部分的需求)
Another important reason to prevent the extinction of a language is to preserve the distinct
ideas that only that particular language can convey. Certain Native American and Oriental languages, for instance, contain words symbolizing spiritual and other abstract concepts that
only these cultures embrace. Thus, in some cases to lose a language would be to abandon cherished beliefs and ideas that can be conveyed only through language.(防止语言消失的又一个原因是思想和信念 beliefs and ideas 的 convey,本段属于罗列例子,说明保护的原因。)
On the other hand, in today's high-tech world of satellite communications, global mobility,
and especially the Internet, language barriers serve primarily to impede cross-cultural communication, which in turn impedes international commerce and trade. Moreover, language barriers naturally breed misunderstanding, a certain distrust and, as a result, discord and even war among nations. Moreover, in my view the extinction of all but a few major languages is inexorable(不为所动的,坚决不变的)--as supported by the fact that the Internet has adopted English as its official language. Thus by intervening to preserve a dying language a government might be deploying its resources to fight a losing battle, rather than to combat more pressing social problems--such as hunger, homelessness, disease and ignorance--that plague nearly every society today.(笔锋一转,科技发展和全球化要求减少语言障碍,少数主流语言势不可挡的取代了所有其他语言,就像互联网官方语言,政府干预就是瞎掰,不如先解决点儿要命的问题,如吃,住,病,文盲等。)
In sum, preserving indigenous languages is, admittedly, a worthy goal; maintaining its own distinct language affords a people a sense of pride, dignity and self-worth. Moreover, by preserving languages we honor a people's heritage, enhance our understanding of history, and preserve certain ideas that only some languages properly convey. Nevertheless, the economic and political drawbacksof language barriers outweighthe benefits of preserving a dying language. In the final analysis, government should devote its time and resources elsewhere, and leave it to the people themselves to take whatever steps are needed to preserve their own distinct languages.(总结全文,梳理论述脉络,最后给出作者观点,政府不用管,人们自己想辙防止语言灭绝吧!)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
今天的commnet 作业:
Comment:
This literary criticism focus on Mr. Nicholas Wade’s book which mainly research on religion. From examining the roots of religion and then come to religion’s significance to humankinds -
‘In what way, then, does religion enhance a group’s survival’. Mr Wade quotes controversies of evolutionary biologists about the religion’s function and meaning during the development of human society to argue how religion helps human survive.
The writer is not absolutely accept all of declarations of the author. Those ideas like when describing the interplay between Hellenic and Hebrew culture at the dawning of Christianity. But the critics gave out a positive comment as a whole of the book and conceded it’s a masterly book and the variety of samples when making argument, like explain a quest for collective ecstasy.
Something our domestic literary criticism need to learn from this article is when they got invitation to introduce a book, they should have some background knowledge about the book’s main concept and then read it dialectically not just fully accept or strongly recommended. Both negative and positive comments should be given out so that the readers can digest the book with arguments. That will be real value of the criticism.
-------------------------------
Highlights:
WHEREVER their investigations lead, all analysts of religion begin somewhere. And in the final lines of his densely but skilfully packed account of faith from the viewpoint of evolutionary biology, Nicholas Wade recalls the place where he first felt sanctity: Eton College chapel.
The “beauty of holiness” in a British private school is a far cry from the sort of religion that later came to interest him as a science journalist at Nature magazine and then the New York Times. To examine the roots of religion, he says, it is important to look at human beginnings. The customs of hunter-gatherer peoples who survived into modern times give an idea of religion’s first forms: the ecstasy 入迷的of dusk-to-dawn tribal 部落的dances, for example.
Charles Darwin, whose idea of the sacred神的,宗教的 also came from an English private school, witnessed religion at its most primordial原始的 when he went to Australia in 1836. He found it horrifying: “nearly naked figures, viewed by the light of blazing fires, all moving in hideous可怕的,讨厌的
丑恶的 harmony…”
Whatever Darwin’s personal sensibilities, Mr Wade is convinced that a Darwinian approach offers the key to understanding religion. In other words, he sides with those who think man’s propensity嗜好
习性 for religion has some adaptive function. According to this view, faith would not have persisted over thousands of generations if it had not helped the human race to survive. Among evolutionary biologists, this idea is contested. Critics of religion, like Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker, suggest that faith is a useless (or worse) by-product of other human characteristics.
And that controversy争论 leads to another one. Does Darwinian selection take place at the level only of individuals, or of groups as well? As Mr Wade makes clear, the notion概念 of religion as an “adaptive” phenomenon makes better sense if one accepts the idea of group selection. Groups which practised religion effectively and enjoyed its benefits were likely to prevail流行
胜过 over those which lacked these advantages.
Of course, the picture is muddied by the vast changes that religion went through in the journey from tribal dancing to Anglican hymns赞美诗 圣歌. The advent of settled, agricultural societies, at least 10,000 years ago, led to a new division of labour, in which priestly castes tried to monopolise access to the divine, and the authorities sought to control sacred ecstasy狂喜 激情状态.
Still, the modifications (that religion has undergone )should not,(in Mr Wade’s view,)distract from转移the study of faith’s basic functions. In what way, then, does religion enhance a group’s survival? Above all, by promoting moral rules and cementing cohesion, in a way that makes people ready to sacrifice牺牲 现身 themselves for the group and to deal ruthlessly with outsiders. These arguments are well made. Mr Wade has a clear mind and limpid prose思路清晰,行文清澈。 style which guides the reader almost effortlessly through 200 years of intellectual history知识史. Perhaps, though, he oversimplifies the link between morality, in the sense of obedience to rules, and group solidarity based on common participation in ecstatic狂喜的 rites宗教仪式.
All religion is concerned (in varying degrees) with metaphysical ideas, moral norms规范 and mystical experience. But in the great religions, the moral and the mystical have often been in tension. The more a religion stresses ecstasy, the less it seems hidebound顽固
狭隘 by rules—especially rules of public behaviour, as opposed to purely religious norms. And religious movements (from the “Deuteronomists” of ancient Israel to the English Puritans) that emphasise moral norms tend to eschew避开
戒绝 the ecstatic.
Max Weber, one of the fathers of religious sociology, contrasted the transcendental超越经验的 feelings enjoyed by Catholic mass-goers with the Protestant obsession with behaviour. In Imperial Russia, Peter the Great tried to pull the Russian Orthodox church from the former extreme to the latter: to curb its love of rite and mystery and make it more of a moral agency like the Lutheran churches of northern Europe. He failed. Russians liked things mystical, and they didn’t like being told what to do.
As well as giving an elegant summary of modern thinking about religion, Mr Wade also offers a brief, provocative history of monotheism. He endorses the radical view that the story of the Jews’ flight from Egypt is myth, rather than history. He sympathises with daring ideas about Islam’s beginnings: so daring that many of its proponents work under false names. In their view, Islam is more likely to have emerged from dissident Christian sects in the Levant than to have “burst out of Arabia”, as the Muslim version of sacred history teaches.
At times, the book stumbles. In describing the interplay between Hellenic and Hebrew culture at the dawning of Christianity, Mr Wade makes exaggerated claims. He says there is no basis for a mother-and-child cult in the religion of Israel. In fact there are many references in the Hebrew scriptures to the Messiah and his mother; the Dead Sea Scrolls have made this even clearer. And his micro-history of Christian theology is inaccurate in places.
These objections aside, this is a masterly有水平的 book. It lays the basis for a rich dialogue between biology, social science and religious history. It also helps explain a quest for collective ecstasy that can take myriad许多的无数的 forms. Perhaps his brief autobiographical reference to Eton should have noted the bonding effect not only of chapel, but also of songs like “Jolly Boating Weather”.
-------------------------------
|