- 最后登录
- 2023-4-26
- 在线时间
- 1375 小时
- 寄托币
- 191569
- 声望
- 10000465
- 注册时间
- 2002-6-8
- 阅读权限
- 255
- 帖子
- 1134
- 精华
- 65
- 积分
- 10006467
- UID
- 30358
- 声望
- 10000465
- 寄托币
- 191569
- 注册时间
- 2002-6-8
- 精华
- 65
- 帖子
- 1134
|
原文
Issue 9
Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience, their ideas will have little use.
近年来学术界更加专业化,以致于学者们的研究只局限于小范围的读者群中。除非学者们可以拥有更广泛的读者群,他们的想法才有用。
With the development of science, more and more academic disciplines become specialized. The result of this trend is only a few audience could understand scholar’s ideas. Although itSTAND FOR WHAT? may impede 是否合适?IMPEDE THE INTERESTthe interest of ordinary people to study the scholar’s idea, it is arbitrary to draw the conclusion that only when scholars can own a larger audience, their ideas are valuable.思路清晰,GOOD论点:不是说除非学者们可以拥有更广泛的读者群,他们的想法才有用。
Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years. As we all known, the knowledge in every太绝对了,严谨性还是很重要的,加个ALMOST吧 area has been developed for many years. Not only are the basic theories near mature, but also the profundity of the research having considerable growth. Many scholars find that it is difficult to find advancement in the macro research areas nowadays. The best way to get an achievement in one’s academic domain is go into the micro world and find something new. 其实就我个人的感觉来说,并不是都想MICRO的方向来发展的,比如什么生物医学,生物统计,等等学多是多学科的合并,结合,也就是说在向广泛的方向发展,当然对于你这个讨论的这个出发点而言如果按我说的这个写不正确,但是在考虑论点的时候是不是也可以换一个方向来想,因为需要的专业知识的面加多,加上你所认为的深度的加深来写的?这个是读到这里想到后面一段你写的内容,可以等等再看This trend is beneficial for the development of science, but the result, obviously, is 需要一个THAT吗,不确定,呵呵the audience of one research will be more and more narrow
As a result of specialization, only a small group of audience could get the scholar’ s ideas. Ordinary people find it is difficult to accept these ideas if they are not the career man in this domain, since the achievements are based on abstruse knowledge, which only the people having high level in this area could understand. 写长句的时候我不是很喜欢写太多的WHICH等等,感觉上打断文章的整体结构,就着附近几句看来,后面还有很多WHO WHOSE。。。。可以考虑换一下表达,句式变一变。当然个人习惯而已,如果是偶就写abstruse knowledge only accessible to ….,不过JJ比偶牛啦,只是说说偶的意见The Nobel Prize of economics in 2003, for instance, is awarded to two scholars who are specialized in econometrics, Robert Engle and Clive Granger, whose contribution is using the econometric analysis to investigate economic time series. This theory makes far-reaching influence in the way of research and the development of economic. For ordinary people, it is impossible to catch on their theory, even if a student whose major is economic, except for the people who have considerable accomplishments in econometric.这个句子意思不错,可是能否换个表达,感觉罗嗦,只要说后面一句就可以完全表达你的意思了吧 Most audience is refused to get the scholar’s ideas by the systematic and specialized knowledge.
先不说内容如何,这个段落有307个字,全文是599个,那么超过全文一半自数的一个段落,是否不太合适?而且,如果可以在主题的每个段落前面有个连接词会好一些。The criterion of evaluating one idea is not depend on how large of the audience could understanding this idea, but lie(s?) on whether this research could be changed to productivity which promotes the development of the society and be used in real life这个论点最好可以在你的第一段里就表明,不要前后有差别. Some achievements, owning a wide reader, because of easy to reading and understanding, cannot be transferred from a theory to utilization in reality. Are these achievements useful? The answer is no, because they are only the theory in textbooks. On the contrary, some ideas, basing on the abstruse and specialized knowledge, which maybe the summit of this area, are the primary impetus to drive the knowledge to further develop. These ideas, although only a few people could get them, are useful, since they could be changed to productivity and be used in real life. For example, the principle of relativity, Einstein’s famous theory, even though not more than one hundred people in the world could understand it, is a special and general theory of relativity revolutionized modern thought on the nature of space and time and formed a theoretical base for the exploitation of atomic energy. Maybe you will be suspicious of the value of this theory, and thinking it is only an armchair strategist, but the force of this theory is profound. If this theory did not used as a basis in physics, it is nearly impossible for scientists to discover the atomic energy, let alone the further development in nuclear industry. Furthermore, it is not necessary for the public to understand all abstruse ideas scholars hold. Let me use computer as an example to support this point. Most people do not know how the CPU is running, but this does not hamper them to use computers. So, the importance of ideas is not the size of audience, but whether it is useful.
On conclusion, although academic disciplines are more and more specialized recently, resulting in only a narrow audience, many of the scholar’s ideas are useful if they could be changed to productivity and are used in real life. |
|