1、the movie was very quiet, the music _____ and ____, drawing attention to the aural nuance as it does to visual details.
选项有liberally, generously, creatively, sparingly, judiciously, negatively
有童鞋找到了题源:
"Visually splendid and ethically serious....The movie is also refreshingly quiet, using music sparingly and showing as much attention to aural nuance as it does to visual detail."
New York Times - A. O. Scott (11/05/2004)
但是对于除了sparigly,另外一个选项是什么,不太清楚。。。
2、although an author repeats that he is a _____ uncle in his book, he makes a persuasive cae to prove the safety of mutating genes to create new foods in his book.
选项有garrulous, loquacious, reticent, reserved, mute, concise
(因为是机经……所以我很怀疑选项是不是真的是这六个……其实我觉得reticent,reserved和mute都比garrulous额loquacious更贴切。garrulous和loquacious似乎有些牵强,如果说要和“persuasive”构成反义,所以想问问大家的意见)
自顶...
还有另外一道题目,也是来自机经,求解
The economist argued that however much the government might trumpet the value of ____, it had been as bold as any other in its spending programs.(2014. 11 30)
A thrift
Bconsumption
C dialogue
D cooperation
E transparency
其实这题的答案网上也找得到,选B。解释是bold=冒失。尽管government鼓吹consumption的价值,但是它和其他的spending programs一样的bold。
不过我在做题时的理解就完全相反了,所以选了thrift。我的理解是bold=明显的(的确也有这个意思啊...)。尽管government鼓吹thrift的价值,但是它(在浪费上)和其他的spending program一样的显著。
而且我到现在也不能理解我的理解为什么不对为什么答案就是consumption。。。求大神解答