argument 116疑问，相信大家也有疑问
Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse in Palm City, but last month we discovered that over $20,000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage. Meanwhile, the Buzzoff Pest Control Company, which we have used for many years in Palm City, continued to service our warehouse in Wintervale, and last month only $10,000 worth of the food stored there had been destroyed by pest damage. This difference in pest damage is best explained by the negligence of Fly-Away."这道题内容被删减后，错误好像找不齐三个啊？大家有什么想法吗？
我提出两个1：we must firstly know about the total amount of food stored in Wintervale so that a better judgment on the seriousness of damage could be made.
2：find out the real reason of pest damage. that is, find out more information about the food damage situation before being stored in warehouse The comparison between the two Pest Control Company is the most significant point...... 本帖最后由 HeronAlps 于 2011-10-15 16:46 编辑
1. The distinction of climate and topography between the Palm city and Wintervale may cause the significantly different dispersions of pest.
2. The memo doesn't mention the effect of Buzzoff's service years in the Palm city, which may also be disastrous. That is insufficient only to compare the very first month of both company's outcome for assuring the Fly-Away's negligence.
3. The purported '$20,000' worth of food may be destroy by worms, however, the Fly-Away previously focused on Flying pest such as grasshoppers. The deflected direction of protection certainly can not be attributed to negligence.
页:
[1]