是不是都没有人参加了啊？我看也没有新题目出来了
想问问八月的开始了吗？？？
karen小心 发表于 2015-7-18 08:37 static/image/common/back.gif
有的 最上面这个就是
上面这个截止交作业的是是什么时候，我还来得及参加吗
蒲公英123 发表于 2015-7-9 20:01 static/image/common/back.gif
没有七月分的吗，不是每天都有题目的吗
有的 最上面这个就是
没有七月分的吗，不是每天都有题目的吗
时隔6个月回来二战啦，希望能坚持写！
word 版本
谢谢亲~
HerbstJulia 发表于 2015-6-28 08:43 static/image/common/back.gif
6月作文~
Some people are under the impression that, to obtain job equality, employers should be r ...
请把文章放word里面便于修改
6月作文~
Some people are under the impression that, to obtain job equality, employers should be required to employ equal numbers of men and women. However, from my perspective, this opinion might be plausible in theory. When put into practice, it is too weak to be supportive.
First of all, some jobs might require more men, while others require more women. If equal numbers of men and women are hired, it will cause severe problems to the efficiency of the company. For example, high-tech enterprises usually employ more men then woman for the reason that men appear to do better in this highly intensive industry. Service industries which are more detail-oriented are inclined to employ more women. Employers are supposed to recruit based on people’s attributes rather than stick to a strict standard.
Second, it is a common phenomenon that population of men and women are out of proportion. It is not hard to deduce that employment market exist such issue as well. If all industries are required to hire equal numbers of men and women, either a small proportion of men or women will remain unemployed. Both men and women should compete freely in an open job market instead of being constrained to certain criterion.
Last but not the least, some people might concern the problem of gender discrimination in current job market. The standard of same numbers can alleviate this problem, however, it is not the optimal solution. There is alternative way to address inequality rather than using this extreme method. Legislation can carry forward relevant laws concerning this issue and so on.
In a nutshell, disadvantages overweigh advantages on this issue. It is too absolute to make it equal of the numbers of men and women employees in a particular industry.
HerbstJulia 发表于 2015-6-23 09:13 static/image/common/back.gif
楼主现在还能加入吗~一个月后考雅思
加入直接上传对应的作业就可以了 我会看上交的情况给各位安排互改
ammo酱 发表于 2015-6-23 16:30 static/image/common/back.gif
同问，刚刚去看了规则，想问现在可以加入吗，也是下个月考
可以 随时可以加入
同问，刚刚去看了规则，想问现在可以加入吗，也是下个月考
楼主现在还能加入吗~一个月后考雅思
izziy 发表于 2015-6-16 12:24 static/image/common/back.gif
直接回复加上自己的作文就可以参与互改作文了吗？
是的
直接回复加上自己的作文就可以参与互改作文了吗？