ISSUE87 ACE 谢谢晴天哦

wp123UID: 2187508

TOPIC: ISSUE87 - "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."
WORDS: 509          TIME: 上午 12:45:00          DATE: 2006-7-29

When comes to a certain domain, there is a dilemma that whether or not the beginner is more possible to make significant founding and discoveries than the expert. The speaker contends it is simply the case in any field of inquiry. However, in my point of view, I doubt his conclusion, and the very answer depends on case-by-case analysis.

To begin with, at first as outsiders, the beginners possess the certain traits to make discoveries, no matter it is important or not. At anyplace and anytime, the newer ones frequently appear with passion and curiosity, which are the quality to discover.  They are always full of energy to stimulate rapid action and powerful behavior. At the same time, since they are new, there are less traditional limitation in their minds, thus it is possible that they combine the knowledge in inquiry and other domains together to generate a creation. For example, a young who major in film working in international educational consult in his fresh year is perhaps to produce a short-film in order to pursue an outstanding style and help understand when he makes a presentation in a workshop. Such a case is certainly a successful creation to attract patrons. However, it is far from a discovery. What can be identified as a discovery must make an advance in the filed itself, but not only the outside style or high effectiveness.

Therefore, to achieve great findings, an individual demands more professional knowledge as a premise. Nobody can possess the whole information of every field. Concentrating on a specific realm makes perfect, and more possibility of discovery. Imagine that if a teenager establishes an economical inquiry company, who can believe his consult? Maybe there exists talent. However, inquiry is a job established on the trust first, how many people are actually willing to believe a beginner rather than a person with professional background, I doubt it. Thus, even if a beginner achieves the premise to make important discovery, he still has to wait others to appraciate his new theory.

Meanwhile, although most experts' minds might be rigid to create, yet they are greatly capable to generalize details, another premise near to a discovery. In the field of inquiry, important discoveries are oftentimes based on large amounts of information and details, which seems to be a impossible work to a beginner. Nevertheless, a person with years of cumulative information can convert so much useful details to a new generalization, the so-called discovery. Take a medical domain for example. Doctors, as a large pool of people working as inquiry, are believed that demand sufficient experience. Why this case? To some extent, it is because they treat patients correctly. On the other hand, the reason is that doctors with high experience or focusing on a certain disease are probable to find the most efficient drug or treatment. In this viewpoint, the expert is more likely to achieve crucial and central discoveries.

Overall, while the beginner is possible to make some success to some degree, or at a superficial level discovery, the paramount findings attribute to large amounts of experience and knowledge, which only lie in expert.

[ 本帖最后由 wp123 于 2006-7-30 00:43 编辑 ]

晴天丫头UID: 2225690

When comes to a certain domain, there is a dilemma that whether or not the beginner is more possible to make significant founding and discoveries than the expert. The speaker contends it is simply the case in any field of inquiry. However, in my point of view, I doubt his conclusion, and the very answer needs case-by-case analyze.

To begin with, at first an outsider, the beginners possess the certain traits to make discoveries, no matter it is important or not. At anyplace and anytime, the newer ones frequently appear with passion and curiosity, which are the quality to discover.  They are always full of energy, and rapid action and behavior. At the same time, for they are new, there are less traditional limitation in their minds, thus it is possible that they combine the knowledge in inquiry and other domain together to make a creation. [这个理由好！没有受学科内的限制，足见思路之发散，可以显出考虑问题的全面性]For example, a young who major in film working in international educational consult in his fresh year is perhaps to produce a short-film when he needs to make a presentation in workshop. Such a case is certainly a successful creation to attract patrons. However, it is far from a discovery. What can be identified as a discovery must make an advance in the filed itself, but not only the outside style or high effectiveness.

Therefore, to achieve great founding, an individual demands more professional knowledge as a premise. Nobody can possess the whole information of every field. Concentrating on a specific realm makes perfect, and more possibility of discovery. Imagine that if a teenager establishes an economical inquiry company, who can believe his consult? Maybe there exists talent. However, inquiry is a job established on the trust first, how many people are actually willing to believe a beginner rather than a person with professional background, I doubt it. Thus, even if a beginner achieves the premise to make important discovery, he still waits others to conform his new theory.

Meanwhile, although most experts' minds might be rigid to create, [这个让步不太有必要，因为前后都没有对这一让步的适当论述，而且全文的逻辑结构似乎也不用批专家，你是先让步肯定新手，再分两部分论述新手的不足。所以这个让步可以不要]yet they are greatly capable to generalize details, another premise near to a discovery. In the field of inquiry, important discoveries are oftentimes based on large amounts of information and details, which seems to be a impossible work to a beginner. Nevertheless, a person with years of cumulative information can convert so much useful details to a new generalization, the so-called discovery. Take a medical domain for example. Doctors, as a large pool of people working as inquiry, are believed that demand sufficient experience. Why this case? To some extent, it is because they treat patients correctly. On the other hand, the reason is that doctors with high experience or focusing on a certain disease are probable to find the most efficient drug or treatment. In this viewpoint, the expert is more likely to achieve crucial and central discoveries.

Overall, while the beginner is possible to make some success to some degree, or at a superficial level discovery, the paramount findings attribute to large amounts of experience and knowledge, which only lie in expert.

[思路和语言都很流畅。尤其是假设举例论证，让我受到启发啊~ 呵呵 保持保持啊]

晴天丫头UID: 2225690

对了我还想问一下
这样只举假设的例子没有一个所谓的名人啊权威啊什么的 可以么？

SiriusFishUID: 2170063

可以的.

xuxiaozhou0510UID: 2187703

TOPIC: ISSUE87 - "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."
WORDS: 509          TIME: 上午 12:45:00          DATE: 2006-7-29

When comes to a certain domain, there is a dilemma that whether or not the beginner is more possible to make significant founding and discoveries than the expert. The speaker contends it is simply the case in any field of inquiry. However, in my point of view, (I doubt his conclusion, and 我认为可以省略)the very answer depends on case-by-case analysis.

To begin with, at first an outsider, the beginners possess the certain traits to make discoveries, no matter it is important or not. At anyplace (好象是副词 应该分开使吧at any places)and anytime,(同前面) the newer ones frequently appear with passion and curiosity, which are the quality to discover.  They are always full of energy, rapid action and behavior(full of包括后面的rapid action …么 要是这样的话好像不通吧… 我自己语法不太好，不知道说的对不对). At the same time, since they are new, there are less traditional limitation in their minds, thus it is possible that they combine the knowledge in inquiry and other domains together to generate a creation. For example, a young who major(s) in film working in international educational consult in his fresh year is perhaps to produce a short-film in order to produce an outstanding style and help understand when he makes a presentation in workshop. Such a case is certainly a successful creation to attract patrons. However, it is far from a discovery. What can be identified as a discovery must make an advance in the filed itself, but not only the outside style or high effectiveness.(举例加分析说理 十分有说服力啊 好好向你学习！)

Therefore, to achieve great founding, an individual demands more professional knowledge as a premise. Nobody can possess the whole information of every field. Concentrating on a specific realm makes perfect, and more possibility of discovery. Imagine that if a teenager establishes an economical inquiry company, who can believe his consult? Maybe there exists talent. However, inquiry is a job established on the trust first, how many people are actually willing to believe a beginner rather than a person with professional background, I doubt it. Thus, even if a beginner achieves the premise to make important discovery, he still has to wait others to appraciate his new theory.

Meanwhile, although most experts' minds might be rigid to create, yet they are greatly capable to generalize details, another premise near to a discovery. In the field of inquiry, important discoveries are oftentimes based on large amounts of information and details, which seems to be a impossible work to a beginner. Nevertheless, a person with years of cumulative information can convert so much useful details to a new generalization, the so-called discovery. Take a medical domain for example. Doctors, as a large pool of people working as inquiry, are believed that demand sufficient experience. Why this case? To some extent, it is because they treat patients correctly. On the other hand, the reason is that doctors with high experience or focusing on a certain disease are probable to find the most efficient drug or treatment. In this viewpoint, the expert is more likely to achieve crucial and central discoveries. (观点后面紧跟例子和解释很清晰啊 嘿嘿 )

Overall, while the beginner is possible to make some success to some degree, or at a superficial level discovery, the paramount findings attribute to large amounts of experience and knowledge, which only lie in expert.

Overall  我水平实在有限 抱着学习的态度 帮你改了一下 有错的地方还请多指出 ：）你的条理很清楚啊  好好赞一下 大家互相鼓励!

wp123UID: 2187508

我刚才自己又看了一下,这个第一篇限制时间的文章,可真是写的漏洞百出啊...见笑了各位......各种语法错误...