issue47 考虑对intellect的理解

xqmelissaUID：140370

Issue 47   
Society does not place enough emphasis on the intellect—that is, on reasoning and other cognitive skills.
社会没有给予智力培养方面足够的重视，比如人的推理和其他认知能力。


As we all know, intellect, including reasoning and other cognitive skills, is an important factor in the process of individual success and social development. However, society does not pay enough attention on it, especially the somewhat unreasonable educational system.

Intellect, defined as the capacity for rational or intelligent thought, includes reasoning ability, capabilities of analyzing and solving problems, etc. It is a crucial factor in the process of not only individual success, but also the development of society. Take Bill Gates, the founder of one famous corporation in the world, as an example. If he had not owned high intellect, Microsoft under his control, would have had no opportunity to develop advanced computer operating systems and dominate the PC market triumphantly. Therefore, intellect has an important influence on the individual success. As for the development of a society, the function of intellect also could not be neglected. Social development depends on exploring more unknown fields, other than fields being existed. Discovering the unknown areas rests on the ability of reasoning, a factor included in intellect and an impetus for social development. As a result, intellect is a basic factor promoting individual success and social development.

The phenomenon that society does not place enough emphasis on the training of intellect is produced by the defect of existing educational system to some extent, such as overemphasizing on scores. Grades, standards to measure how much knowledge in textbooks being mastered by students, have many defects. For example, the capability trained in the test is the repeating of what the book says, while others, such as creative thinking and reasoning, could not be improved from this process. A consequence of these standard tests is the fact that some students, owning high scores in the school, have difficulties to fit for the job requiring them to use their cognitive skills, other tan repeating. Only if educational systems could pay more attention on the training of the development of students' whole abilities, jobs requiring more cognitive skills are easier to be taken on than ever. Then, the improvement of educational systems will bring advantages to society.

The approach of solving this problem is that not only educational systems, but also whole society should begin to attach importance to the training of intellect, as doing in some successful companies and universities nowadays. Some successful companies and universities adopt many measures to overcome defects in existing school education. For example, Microsoft has a strict procedure of enrolling employees, including an elaborate designed test which could scientific evaluate various intellect levels of job-finders. Employees in this company will receive a systematic training to improve their comprehensive intellect not only reasoning, but also other cognitive skills. There is another instance about the successful pushing an approach which reduces the pressure of pursuing high scores in Chinese elementary school recent years. As a result, a survey taken by an authoritative organization shows that the general abilities have obviously increasing after carrying out the approach, and recommends other schools to adopt this approach. From these examples, we could draw a conclusion that some good ways to solve the problem of ignoring intellect could be used as references by both educational systems and the whole society.

To sum up, society should pay more attention on intellect by adopting some effective approaches immediately, since it is too important to be neglected.  （557 words）



这个狂狂狂BT的文章,写的我快疯了!!!
限时55分钟,没完成不说,而且完成的部分很不满意,这是又修改了1个小时的成果,可是还心里没底,大家给看看吧,谢谢了!

尝试的一种新写法:
阐述重要性----分析问题产生原因----如何解决问题

对这种写法很没自信,唉!

附上我的提纲:
总论点：同意
分论点：（智力培养的重要性----产生原因----解决方法）
1、intellect的重要性，有利于成功，Bill Gates
2、因为学校教育的一些不合理，导致了缺少智力培养。考试、追求高分、高分低能现象的产生。
3、解决办法，社会应该加强对这一问题的重视程度。一些公司招聘的时候重视除分数外的许多因素，加强对员工的培训等。更多的企业、学校应该学习这些成功经验。

xqmelissaUID：140370

最初由 kavent 发布
社会不重视智力因素。层层深入式展开：从当前教育来看，教育系统重视学生的认知和记忆能力，教育更多只是单方面的传授，如历史，哲学等，而这个是社会片面强调“记忆型人才”的后果。当今很多企业中令总裁头疼的问题之一就是创造性人才的短缺，许多征募回来的“优秀毕业生”根本只会按部就班，唯令适从。拿智力因素中的推理来说，是一个管理人员必备的素质，书本上的只是永远都是以前的一种案例参考，相较于今天永远都是落伍的。所以推理让我们以所知来解决所未知，社会要发展不是依赖所知，而是要靠开发所未知。而这是个循环的过程，未知变为所知后才能继续向前开发，因而认知能力也是必不可少。认识不清跟没有认识一样危险！非智力的灌输只能让人陷于从前的淤泥里驻留而埋没。
这道题很能考察我们的思维能力和理解能力。首先审题注意忽略的主体是“社会”，不是“教育系统”，千万注意！我们可以从当前社会的一个组员——教育入手引出问题的根本，然后有效利用题目给出的两个提示性要素——推理和认知大做文章，有效各自展开。这样文章就比较容易上手了。注意我们检验文章是否回应正确的方法：题目问社会重视智力因素吗？你说当前教育不重视，导致社会上很多管理人才缺乏推理，认知能力，但是今天的社会仍在这种情况下不自觉地进行着这种恶性循环。可见问和答是匹配的。有效利用题目给出的信息，特别是列举是全面有效回应的好方法
[/B]

这个我早看过了,虽然不反对这个观点吧
但是我不想写成这种写法,说不清楚为什么,反正不是很喜欢
所以尝试的这种写法
也不知道是否成功
大家给看看啊!

xqmelissaUID：140370

最初由 sniper613 发布
我把我的syllabus说一下吧：
1． 与作者说的正好相反，现在的学校很强调intellect education.
2． 但是学校忽落了Emotion education.
3． 对于morality也是很重要的一个教育方面。
[/B]

不同意！
我觉得这个题目说的不是IQ和EQ的问题，而是说是否除了IQ外，应注重其他素质的培养，但是不一定就是EQ的

这个intellect我专门查了一下MW，是这个意思：
Intellect: a: the power of knowing as distinguished from the power to feel and to will: the capacity for knowledge; b: the capacity for rational or intelligent thought especially when highly developed

就是说，是智力的培养问题吧，其实和你说的IQ差不多啊

intellect的重要性，有利于成功，Bill Gates(Bill哥的成功很大程度上不是intellect而是emotional factors)

是吗？
如果他没有高智商，怎么会抓住那种好的机遇呢？
成功人士大部分的智商还是很高的，当然了，极少数除外

。(例子完全错误，正是学校教育追求智力培养才重视考试，而忽略了其他方面，如情商，morality,马加爵是一个典型吧，intellect很高，但是都干了些什么？)

应该是我中文TS有问题，我想说，考试更多注重记忆能力，却忽视了其他能力的培养，比如创造性，等等

这个是我的理解，再讨论一下吧！

xqmelissaUID：140370

彻底晕掉了
再下去想想啊

其他人还有什么讨论吗？

xqmelissaUID：140370

这个题目，我对intellect的理解还是智商、智力

题目说：社会没有给予智力培养方面足够的重视，比如人的推理和其他认知能力。
我的立论是：同意题目观点，没有给予足够重视。
然后围绕这一点进行阐述，逻辑脉络就是：为什么说智力重要----为什么说社会重视不够----如何去加强重视。

至于你们所说的EQ问题，题目根本没有涉及啊？
题目就是问你，你是否认为现在社会给予IQ足够的重视
所以，我认为，如果再牵扯进来EQ的话，可能偏离的有点远。

xqmelissaUID：140370

噢，补充一句：
可能第一段我的例子，BILL 的是没一些科学家的好，同意这个观点，谢谢！

xqmelissaUID：140370

最初由 sniper613 发布
[B]我的观点是只要和题目里面关键词可以联系的内容都可以写啊
一般意义上讲，IQ基本上是和EQ相对的。题目说没有对IQ重视，但是也没问你如何加强重视啊？
我记得issue里面有些题是关于竞争是否有利,但是我们仍然可以联系到合作阿。
所以我觉得这道题完全可以联系到EQ上面去。

我现在是这么想的,可能我们的想法都可行,只是界定不同罢了,所以只要可以自圆其说就OK了,而不必大家都写成一个模式

你觉得呢?

xqmelissaUID：140370

最初由 imong 发布
[B]拜托各位~
没觉得这篇文章语言表达很出色，society does not pay enough attention on it, especially the somewhat unreasonable educational system.后半句怎么看怎么觉..

以下省略...... [/B]

:(
真是的,一点面子都不给
郁闷~

xqmelissaUID：140370

最初由 lovebrian 发布
[B]不知道imong看了我的语言会怎么说~~sigh [/B]

哈哈
直接砍了
:p  ;)  :p

xqmelissaUID：140370

对对,同意鼻涕虫的观点!
我和大家一样都是在备考的,现在差的还很多很多,常被IMONG批的

大家狠狠批吧!