issue 127 事实不可改变，求砖头啊

HAHAHAUID：162566

Issue127 第3篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
Facts are stubborn things. They cannot be altered by our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions.
------正文------
According to a philosophical standpoint (and I paraphrase), “matters existed in this world are objective while not subjective.” That is to say matters could not be changed due to chang 后用with humankinds' willingness, inclinations and so on. So are facts.

To better understand what facts are, we should first be able to discern the false fact and the fact –为什么要用两个the fact?直接用后面的the “true” fact会不会更直接一点？ the “true” fact. True facts mean what have happened and hence no one could change this status. But someone might distort it according to his or her wishes, inclinations and then feign some so-called “facts” – the false ones. One example might help me illustrate this point more clearly. For example, when proposed that sun-center solar system, Bruno threw the temporal geocentric theory into question which seriously challenged the authorities. To keep their regnant position, the Christian sentenced him to death as a heretic. Though some scientists realized what is true – the fact, yet the populace might be still considered the geocentricism as the true fact. Conspicuously, we today easily tell that heliocentricism is the true fact, but could we assert that several centuries ago, the Christian had changed the fact? Of course not. What they did is just to make up some false fact but not to change the fact.
第一段的ts是什么？
识别“事实”(已经发生的不以人的意志为转移的)——But,有些人会歪曲（example），——但最终事实还是事实。我想一段结束最好加一个总结，我看的过程中的感觉：好像把人拉到老远，但没有收回来，
最后点名一下这段的主题、再回应一下题目比较好cannot be altered by our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions.

Furthermore, we still should be able to tell the relative fact and the fact似乎有点表述不准确，或者在the fact之间加一个定语;还是不明白tell是鉴别的话后面是接from. That is to say, in a certain period, the relatively lower，对应后面的worse scientific and technological standard leads to the worse understanding of some natural phenomena and thereby we might take some wrong as fact – the relative fact. Obviously, with scientific and technological development, this fact is certain to be corrected: this好现有点指代的问题，要么换成which指代前面一句中说的事实， never means that we human change the fact, but we know better what the fact is. For example, in the primitive time, Aristotle proposed that balls fell proportional to their weights and the populace took this as a fact for approximately two thousand years until a man who climbed the Pisa Lean Tower, throwing several balls with all different weight to test it. Finally, some new fact – the famous law of free ball - came out. Then could we assert that Galileo had changed the fact? Of course not. As a matter of fact, he just approached closer to the fact, and the Aristotle’s theory was just a relative theory. In fact, just as a gifted scientist said (and I paraphrase), “not, after all, that there is any such thing as truth; at best we can approach to some relative approximation”, this is an indispensable process in our human history: from the relative one to the true.

All in all, the fact means the true, which can never be changed due to with other factors, otherwise, they are relative facts or false ones.
看下来感觉例子集中在一个方向，可能分散些会更好
B1:识别错误的事实和真正的事实——真正的是事实已经发生的、不以人的意志为转移的
B2:此外，我们要区分相对的事实和真正的事实:相对的事实——科技水平发展较低的时期导致对自然现象的错误理解；而真正的事实是科技进步后修正的。（这么说的话科技永远在进步，会不会就没有真正的事实了？比如说我们现在认为是真实的，有可能科技再进步后又被修正了？再回头看看题目：事实是顽固不变的，不会以人的意志、兴趣、热情为转移的。会不会有点偏了。待商榷。）
这题好象比较那难，我还没写