独立写作小组 ————BY HOLYIRINI

习惯留念UID：2690749

The speaker tends to measure teachers' efficiency by classify them in two opposite characters. I concede that a serious and strict teacher may treat his or her teaching in a serious and strict way（和前面的A SERIOUS AND STRICT有点重复，把前面的OMIT吧） which leads to an effective work. However, the speaker potentially denies possible validity of teachers who are humorous and easygoing, which the possibility obviously exists. From my perspectives, a teacher's character can not be seen as a kind of criteria to assess teaching levels.

, U
With National College Entrance Exam system occupying an increasingly critical position in students' future, teachers especially those teaching in high schools are under pressure by being required to teach students to gain higher exam（OMIT EXAM） scores. The pressure coming from all aspects of society calls for every teacher working in a more serious and strict way. Facing to (到底要不要TO,CHECK IT）the situation, teachers naturally possessing these characters, which is serious and strict, are more likely to adapt to the contemporary way in teaching. Compared to those above, humorous and easygoing teachers are commonly regarded as no pragmatic value with just inane appearance. However, this contention mistakes humorous and easygoing character as impractical aspects and ignores the other aspects of these teachers.7 C; `: ?& S0 E, n
1 Q6 o9 H: J& W% ]" {

Furthermore, no one can assert that a person with humorous and easygoing character do not have the other different characters. Also(应该是转折连词吧。）, it seems completely contradictive on logic. Human as an intricate kind of animal own the most complicated characters that there still isn't definite classification and explanation to these characters（THERE BALABALA 这个句子是CHARACTERS的定语从句，后面又TO THESE CHARACTERS，语法出现了问题）. Take my history teacher for example. He is the kind of people who is really active in class but also strictly even harshly （应该是形容词吧，或者在前面添加DO THINGS？）on the quality of our homework and exam scores.' c; ?/ L$ E8 e% \6 T# k  V
' d4 x% T5 K7 A, S. x

To conclude, the criterion of comparison between two kinds of teachers on affectivity is vague and（is) lack of theoretical foundation. We should not judge a teacher just by considering his or her character due to (换成BECAUSE最好，DUE TO容易出现语法问题)that a person's total characters can not be realized by others even himself or herself.2 ?/ o1 n$ T& x6 R

总的来说。楼主的作文功底很不错了。用词也很不错。只是个别语法上还有点小问题。
另外最好还有更细的例子支撑就很好了。感觉在阐述有些问题上稍显累赘。不过已经很不错了。
向你学习。