1006G[REBORN FROM THE ASHES组]备考日记 by 崂山小神——把握自己最想要的

崂山小神UID：2688698

自说自话的小神——
    最近无语，忙期中的专业课考试，忙项目，忙编程，终于忙的差不多了，松口气，回归寄托，回归AW。。。其实看着每一份努力都渐渐有了收获，便忽然间释怀，尽管每天马不停蹄，偶尔的放松甚至还会有轻微的罪恶感。。。晚上一点多睡下，真正的一沾枕头就酣然入眠；早上7点醒来吧，醒来脑子里便开始想AW，想二月的战役。。。还是这样，依旧这样，觉得心头有件挂念真是一件好事，虽然这个挂念是AW。13个周没出校门了，算是自我隔离，sigh。。。下周散个心，去逛街吧。。。心情好=效率高

崂山小神UID：2688698

不知不觉又过零点啦  小熬了一下  不过终于可以贴上issue13啦 （待改。。。）今晚先这样，加油加油！
Nowadays there is an increasing tendency that many of the world’s lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them. Since a language is regarded as a symbol of culture and civilization, it should be well-preserved and respected by people who speak it. One of the good ways to study the culture and history of an area is to learn the language there. Therefore, the government of countries in which these languages are spoken should take responsibility to prevent such languages from becoming extinct.


Are these lesser-known languages so out-dated that they are going to be abandoned by people who once spoken them? Actually, there are several reasons for its coming vanishing. Firstly, the language itself sustains some disadvantages, such as not being clear enough and having vague meanings which leads to misunderstanding. People feel it difficult to communicate with each other by using such language, thus they intend to change for another which may be more convenient and precise to speak and write. In addition, the disappearance of these languages may be attributed to the integration of some small regions into a whole country. As the unity of a country sometimes calls for a standard of language, people who speak their own language in various regions of the country have to abandon their own language and follow a unified one. What’s more, the tendency of globalization also plays an important role in it. As a result, a large number of languages which are once spoken in tribes or some small countries vanished, while another great number of languages are in danger as fewer and fewer people speak them.


From the perspective of protecting the culture and tradition in a particular area, the governments of countries should take actions to prevent the languages there from disappearing. A language is a carrier of culture and history rather than a tool for communication. When it comes to the origin of a language, it is actually a byproduct with the development of a particular culture and tradition in an area, thus could reflect the civilization of a particular group, like a tribe or even a country to some extent. There’s no doubt that some sociologist feel it hard to explore the development of a society without fully acknowledging its language. Take the language of a minority in China for example, with the development of the whole country, all of the youngsters in that group begin to learn a more standard and unified language called mandarin in China. As a result, only an old man of that minority could speak its original language, and the youngsters know little about the history and culture of their own tribe, for they could not understand any written or audible material by that language. Indeed, some culture cannot be explained or understood by the so-called Esperanto. If a language is extinct completely, some precious material about its culture will become a mystery in the future. Governments must take actions to release this possibility.


The government should prevent the language of its country from being extinct since it represents a country’s freedom and sovereignty. Mother language is usually acclaimed as the most beautiful language in the world. However, some underdeveloped countries have to abandon their own language for some political reasons or under the influence of globalization. Consequently, it loses not only a kind of culture, but its independence and sovereignty as well. It may be argued that there’s a tendency to speak a so-called Esperanto, such as English as time passes by. However, I do not think it is feasible, for the world is going to be multiple instead of united, also every language has a special meaning to a country so that it is not valid to unify the language in the worldwide. For example, French regard speaking their mother language as a patriotic behavior, and they hardly speak English although they could communicate with it fluently. Indeed, a language has too many particular meanings related to a country’s dignity, thus the government should maintain the status of the mother language , which benefits the stabilization of a country.


To sum up, as an administration of a country, the government should take measures to protect the languages which are in danger of being extinct, including both its mother language and some languages which represent culture of a particular group. There is no controversy between protecting the multiple culture and assuring the unity of a country. Actually, it is a good choice to maintain multicolored culture and tradition throughout a country and preserve its sovereignty and independence across the world.

崂山小神UID：2688698

怎么个情况，编辑帖子格式总是不对。。。话说不经常在坛子里混，小神实在对此。。。挠头。。。再试一次撒
。。。。。。。。。
气死我啦，总是不行，算了贴个附件好了。。。

崂山小神UID：2688698

帖子不知是怎么了，老是有问题，哭。只能在里面添加附件了，实在舍不得弃楼哇…
最近小神也赶上了感冒的大军，今天晚上在编辑完了备考日志以后，已经说不出是什么感受了。下午做单片机数据采集实验，用的一篇破51单片，输入了N多机器码之后发现有错误无法正常运行，于是又重新检查。当时眼泪差点没出来了。最近可能在积RP吧，手机弄丢了两次，好在遇到了大大大的好人，但是来回折腾的心神不宁；电脑今天早上抽抽了，于是请教了N多人后无果，还是决定重装系统。于是又是一番折腾。。。。。。积了一堆实验报告，终于事到临头而不得不做了。话说出来混早晚是要还的，这话真是不假。心情有点小阴霾，因为感冒的原因周末又不能出去了，天，十四周了，闷死个我吧。。。。。。
某人问我最近为什么不常去自习室了，说什么好呢，无语。。。其实考虑倒可以换个教室了。。。
好吧好吧，打起精神来，大家都一样的，而且自己不是还有一堆作业没做么。专业课的，GRE的，还有实验，快期末了，必须要抓紧了。昨天写个人事迹资料熬到一点半，结果今天竟然8点才起，不能这样了，明天再怎么说也要去自习室，早些起床。。。。。。
晚安，对所有人说。

崂山小神UID：2688698

今天终于帖上了argument143，加油补作业撒
In this argument, the author claims that a recent article printed on a national newspaper on corporate downsizing in the United States is misleading by pointing out some evidence in a recent report on the United States economy. At first glance, it sounds reasonable. However, the evidence provided by the author cannot validly support the conclusion validly. And the conclusion may mask people about the facts of corporate downsizing in the United States as well as lead to ignorance of the current condition of unemployment in U.S.

First of all, as mentioned in this argument, a recent report on the United States economy demonstrates that since 1992 far more jobs have been created than have been eliminated. However, it does not provide the actual number of the jobs created recently. Perhaps the number is still lower than the number of workers although it is higher than the number of jobs eliminated. Therefore, the vague data could not persuade us of the increasing number of newly created jobs. On the other hand, granted that there is a large number of new jobs that meet the need of the unemployed workers, the author fails to convince us that these newly created jobs are suitable for the laid-off workers, or they are willing to take these jobs. It is possible that these workers are fired as a result of an increasing demand for applying to new technology and advanced machines which they fail to meet, although they are competent in the original workplace. If the newly created jobs also require such ability, the laid-off workers could hardly take these jobs for they could not meet the professional need of the work. As a consequence, without providing the actual number of the newly created jobs or demonstrating that the unemployed workers can take these jobs, the author could not persuade us that the job opportunity could eliminate the influence of downsizing and release the economic hardship of the laid-off workers.

Secondly, it is cited that two-thirds of the new jobs have been in industries that tend to pay above-average wages, and the majority of them are full-time jobs. However, the author fails to inform us how many unemployed workers take those highly paid and full-time jobs mentioned above. Given that the number is reasonable, the facts that these industries tend to pay high wages and the majority of them are full time cannot guarantee that the newly created jobs in these industries are the same. As we all know, nowadays a company usually has some approaches which are in need of a large number of temporary workers who are paid for a low salary and usually do part-time work. It is possible that the increasing newly created jobs include such kind of temporary and part-time jobs which are not stable enough to take. Only by providing the actual statistic of the laid-off workers who actually take these new jobs and the evidence that they must get excellent treatment in their work, could the author concludes that the downsizing does not impact on people’s life so much, for they could overcome the economic hardship by taking new jobs.

Last but not least, the statistics above does not rule out the possibility that many laid-off workers do face serious economic hardship before they find a suitable job. In fact, if a job pays reasonably and has a good treatment, the unemployed people will not hesitate to compete for it, which must leave part of them unemployed as before. Meanwhile, the newly graduated students, who are more active and creative thus seem to be more appropriate for these jobs may also compete with them. Therefore before the laid-off workers find other suitable employment, they must sustain serious economic hardship for a while. Considering this, the article which the author disagrees with does not exaggerate the influence of corporate downsizing to some extent.

In sum, the argument which evaluates a recent article on corporate downsizing as misleading is weak in several grounds. To strengthen it, the author must provide the actual number of the newly created jobs and compare it with the number of laid-off workers. Moreover, the author should make sure that the unemployed workers are fit for these jobs and the jobs actually have good treatment. Furthermore, the author needs to consider the current condition of employment as a whole.