- 最后登录
- 2010-6-10
- 在线时间
- 52 小时
- 寄托币
- 904
- 声望
- 12
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-17
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 5
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 709
- UID
- 2118079
![Rank: 4](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level3.gif)
- 声望
- 12
- 寄托币
- 904
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-17
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 5
|
83"Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
With the fast development of society and technology, there is more and more need to the nature resources. Should government preserve publicly owned wildness areas in their nature state or use existing nature source to develop industry? My answer is the former.
Preserving wildness area is to make balance between nature and humanity. During the long history river, people are always damaging the environments. They cut forests, polluted river and changed the farmland to sands which all brought severe problems to people. Taking forests as an example. As the lung of nature, forests can make effect on clearing air and preventing soil losing. Supposing that one day forests disappear forever in our world, what will be brought by that? At first, people and their offspring will never see this green. Secondly, polluted air which can not be cleared by tree again will possibly cause kinds of disease to people and even make people dead. Last and not the least, people will loose resource of wood to produce paper and construct buildings. So that government should preserve wildness areas not only for the environments of earth but also for the people themselves.
In wildness areas there are kinds of wild animals and plants, some of which are nearly extinct in the world. Preserving the inhabiting area of these animals and plants are equal to protect these species. Review the long history, there are two main reasons resulting in the extinction of species. One of two reasons is the change of outer environments which can not avoided by the people , however , the another reason is the inference of people themselves. Some species are died for the endless hunt of people even in remote area accessible to only a few people, such as oryx in Tibet altiplano ,or for missing the living area taken by humanity. To protect our friends, these animals and plants, government should preserve wild area for them to survive and prevent the inference of people , or less people will live in earth alone.
The progress of preserving wild area is only executed by governments ,not by private people. people do not have the ability and power to protect environments or preserve area so that they have to get the help of governments. there are not some people owning private wild area, such as forest in the world and even owning it is also possibility that they may do not want to preserve forests. however in every nation there are wild area and government have more ability to preserve area than single or some people.
To sum up, to protect the balance between nature and humanity and our friends, various specious, preserving wild area ,even though it is accessible to only a few people, is of course needed. And this process should be carries out by governments because they own powers and have ability to establish this more effective than few people. |
|