- 最后登录
- 2009-1-2
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 230
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-6
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 3
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 195
- UID
- 2114008
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 230
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 3
|
我也写了一篇,就是严重超时,看看贝
83.Goverment should preserve publicy owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people.
Why do species of biology extinct so astonishingly in the modern society? In my observation, some short sight governments should assume indispensable responsibility of this adversity, for they overlook the necessity of protecting wilderness areas.
It is true that government have a great deal of pressing problems to deal with. Government must ensure the welfare of all the citizens to maintain the equilibrium of nation, must prevent various crimes to ensure the security of people, must endeavor to improve nation's economy to strengthen the nation, also must strike a balance on the intricate international relationship to gain optimum profit for the whole nation and so forth. There is no money, no energy, and no attention left for wilderness areas.
However, so crucial are wilderness areas, which are relative to our future, that government should take action to preserve them. It is for they are often extremely remote and accessible to only a few people that they especially preserve various species. Many species of great value in scientific researches, most of which are unique, only exist in the wilderness areas. Losing them in these areas indicates that we lose it forever. Moreover, nevertheless these areas are often remote from us, the relationships of nature are invariably mysterious, and then the extinction of one species in remote areas will result in unexpected effect for humans. “Butterfly effect” should not be forgotten by us. To some extent, nature has warned us by bird flu, food and mouth disease and pig flu recently found in China. Suppose all these diseases happen in one day, how further human beings can go. In sum, for human beings' own interests government should protect wilderness areas.
Moreover, wilderness areas are facing the severe threat of human-made disaster, and it is the duty of government to prohibit those ill actions immediately. If one kind of biology dies out naturally, it is none of our business for the sake of natural selection, and yet what a pity it is not the truth. Illegal people are intended to benefit from wilderness areas. Even if there are only a few people having this idea, their actions are sufficient to give rise to permanent destroying, which are beyond retrieval, to these areas. There is an astonishing statistic about Tibetan antelopes. This species only existing on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, is suffering a brutal slaughter, diminishing by the speed of 20,000 a year and left less than 75,000. One day of five years later, when we open our eyes as usual, perhaps they have been lost from this earth forever, so do other species endangering. In a word, it is the fault of human beings, thus government should endeavor to protect them.
What is more, only government has ability to protect these areas effectively. Returning to the example of Tibetan Plateau, there are a group of people, the bravest volunteers, in Tibet fighting with hateful poachers, with tough weather, with thin air and with death, however compared with poachers their power seems to be so faint, for they are having little of fund, in need of guns, lack of everything expect the spirit of justice. Only government has a great many advantages to forbid illegal rampant hunting fundamentally, for they have money, the right to legislate and execute law, and ability of global co-operation. Given forbidding all the trades relevant to "Shahtoosh" the wool of Tibetan antelopes globally, extinct speed of antelopes will be slowed greatly. In sum, effective protection comes from government.
Busy as government seems to be, it is not a good excuse to say no to protection of wilderness areas. Wilderness areas are related to our long-term benefit, so government should place effort on wilderness areas as well as immediate problems. |
|