几道OG上的填空题,我读不懂。。。
Statements presented as fact in a patent application are (presumed verifiable) unless a good reason for doubt is found. The invention has only to be deemed "more likely than not"to work in order to receive initial approval. And although thousands of patents are challenged in court for other reasons, no incentive exists for anyone to espend efforts (debunkiwill continung) the science of an erroneous patent. For this reason the endless stream of (bogus) devices will continue to yield occasional patents.
Ever a demanding reader of the fiction of others, the novelist Chase was likewise often the object of (exacting) analyses by his contenporaries。