- 最后登录
- 2014-4-19
- 在线时间
- 185 小时
- 寄托币
- 336
- 声望
- 26
- 注册时间
- 2011-1-21
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 38
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 152
- UID
- 2995938
![Rank: 3](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level2.gif) ![Rank: 3](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level1.gif)
- 声望
- 26
- 寄托币
- 336
- 注册时间
- 2011-1-21
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 38
|
之前米有看见小组~发几篇JJ的作文,求板上筒子帮忙看看改改,谢谢~
20100130 NA
Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there’s no practical use?
As an old saying goes, science is the ladder to the development of we human being. True as it says, scientific research do bring us with much of the results that we can apply widely to virtually all sphere of our daily life, thus making it more meaningful and convenience. However, scientific research can be divided to two parts: theoretical ones and practical ones. In my point of view, both of them should be taken seriously and funded greatly by the government.
First and foremost, practical research should be financially aid greatly since it requires much of money to put in. Only with sufficient finance support can those valuable researches, especially from engineering or medical science area, be carried out continuously until the date of accomplishments, as it did in the case of Human Gene Series Programs, which involves with researchers from over 10 countries including developed and developing ones. It’s hard to imagine this huge project could even survive without funding from governments. Also, with more money in hand, scientists can purchase the latest equipment ever made and some precious data that cannot be easily obtained without considerable amount of money, which is of extremely benefit to the success of the research. For example, a professor majored in economics has ever told me that data, industrial data in particular, is the key to their success, for the simple reason that if the more figures you’ve attained, the more chances you will grasp to find the correlationship between categories and categories in precise.
Also, we cannot turn a blind eye to those scientific researches which fail to present value instantly, in the ways of giving no financial aid at all. Theory is the basis of practical use, especially in the long term, which has been proved through the history of exploration. No one can ever be succeed without the strong fundamental theories or problem-solving techniques. Taken theoretically astronomic physics as an example, which hardly anyone would view it as useful, it needs funds dramatically to aid its laboratory experiments and astronomic observation and some countries, especially U.S government spend greatly on it, which even has established a specific institution, NASA. Through detailed yet continuous observations day and night, year in and year out, scientists finally attained much of invaluable data and photos of planets, which makes it possible for people to explore these magic planets in person. In that way, how can you deny its necessary of money funding on those researches seemingly of no use?
However, since the government’s budget is constrained, we must admit that there does exist some limits in the investment of scientific research. Much of the money should be put in the improvement of social welfare, especially for a country where people is suffered from starving, medical insurance problems, etc. And considering the efficiency of the investments, the majority of scientific funding should, indeed, be invested on the practical use rather than theoretical ones, for the simple reason that the latter usually requires less amount of money than the former ones.
In a nutshell, the government should put more emphasize on the development of science by giving financial support to scientific research programs, whether they can be used promptly. With sufficient money to maintain the operation of research in a reasonable distribution way, I am convinced that much of research result will be put out to make its contribution to the society, regardless of what kind of science research is. |
|