- 最后登录
- 2015-10-21
- 在线时间
- 15 小时
- 寄托币
- 1109
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-5-10
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 426
- UID
- 163868
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1109
- 注册时间
- 2004-5-10
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
The twenties' century saw tremendous changes to our human beings at many aspects. On agriculture, high technology was used to promote the productivity of farming and save a large amount of people who were in the danger of hunger; on industry, various electronic appliances are invented and applied to our daily life. Technology advancements solve many problems and indeed improve our quality of life. However, some problems continue to bother our humans when we has stepped in to new century, such as pollution, depletion of resources, race conflict, terrorism and so forth. Thus, some people argue that, in order to address these world's most persistent social problems, all nations should participate in supporting the development of a global university.
As the advocates believe, in such global university students are educated and specialized with those continuing problems and after they graduate they can play an important role in the process of solving them. Is it really so? In my view,to judge whether such a university is necessary and effective, we should first turn to examine the factors that cause those persistent social problems.
Having a closer examination of these problems, we can find that it is the increasing gap between developed countries and developing countries and the inherent difference of cultures that course those persistent problems. Why people never stop polluting the environment and exhausting the limited resources while they have noticed the serious environmental problems and the depletion of resources? While developed countries call on reducing pollution, they gradually move their industries to developing countries; while they advocate restricting the explore of resources, they have to demand a large amount of gas, petroleum,coal,etc.to maintain the high level of everyday consumption. The developing countries, in order to keep pace with the development of the global economy or compensate the exchequer of the country, would rather ameliorate their economy condition at the expense of depleting resources and polluting environment. Similarly,
why race conflicts always occur in the world,
这句用always occur似乎不太好,感觉,不过这个例子我觉得是这个问题的经典,我也用过
like between Israel and Palestine, while people have realized that peace is the foundation of the development of society. It is the inherent difference of culture formed in history that leads to the ceaseless conflicts. In sum, to address these social problems, we should try to eliminate or reduce the effects of these factors, such as the gap between developed and developing countries and the difference of culture.
Turning back to the global university, is it really conducive to solve these continuing problems? As a matter of fact, although it have some merits, a global university is not effective to help addressing these problems. A global university provides an environment for students from different countries to communicate with each other,
这个理由佷对。我认为global univ的一个重要作用是增进理解,交流技术,以消除文化之间的不理解和冲突,以及促进经济发展的平衡
which can facilitates the mutual understanding and enable students to share the unique ideas of other cultures. However, limited by the number of members, only mutual understanding among these students is far not enough to reduce the inherent difference of cultures. Many Israel' and Palestine' students study in the same university in Europe and North America, but the race conflicts continue.
所以global uni才是需要的,因为在这里应该有更多的课程是文化方面的,这是欧洲和美国的大学无法做到的啊
Moreover, the gap between developed countries and developing countries will not be mitigated because these students equipped with special knowledge may not take essential position in governments. Whether the ideas are adopted and the graduates are employed in governments is determined by the policy of each country. In addition, with regard to the complexity of the issue about those problems which have bother humans many years, it is difficult for professors to teach students how to solve them properly. These issues should be left to those diplomats, leaders and economists--not to professors and students in university.
这个理由似乎不太对,因为students是未来的leaders, economists
It is not only less effective but impractical to require all nations to participate in building and supporting such a university. Many poor countries are more likely to spend the money and resources on feeding their hungry people and building public facilities rather than support a global university. If only a few developed countries support and are in charge of this university, they will be more concerned with those issues that have the direct influence on themselves and neglect those bothering other countries altogether. In that case, a global university defeats its goals and can not be called "global" any more. Even if such a university is built and supported by all nations, controversy will arise when it comes to decide which issue to be the most urgent problems and how to allocate the resources of university. Different countries have different views, and they may all insist that the issues which influence themselves are more pressing and should be solved first. Therefore, such a university will cause new problems before it really solve any one.
我觉得由于题目没有涉及这个大学的具体解构,所以这里说impratical没有什么意义,相反,提出如何让它更为pratical,更effient的方案其实更好。例如全球的合作需要developed countries在经济上更多支持,但是developing countries要和developed有一样的参与权利。
如果要说这种global uni的缺陷,我觉得有一个缺陷是由于各国国情不同,虽然交流很重要,但是如果不能避免硬套他国经验,效率就很低。有些国家的经验对于其他国家的情况可能没有借鉴价值。所以不能把一切希望寄托在global uni上面。
In sum, building a global university is not an effective and practical way to solve the persistent problems in this world. It will be a waste of money to require all nations to join in this program. Although it has some merits, a global university will achieve little and disappoint its advocates.
====================================
措辞很好,我不能比...羡慕中。也佷通顺,没有注意到很明显的语法错误。 |
|