寄托天下
查看: 3549|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] Issue121 第2篇超时5分钟.保护野生动物 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
3219
注册时间
2004-7-24
精华
2
帖子
4
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-3-17 12:42:21 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Issue121  第2篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧!
------摘要------
作者:寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间:50分39秒    535 words
从2005年2月17日10时44分到2005年2月34日11时44分
------题目------
At various times in the geological past, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, rather than human, processes. Thus, there is no justification for society to make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
------正文------
As is universally acknowledged, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, instead of human, processes as various times in the geological past. Therefore some people, including the author, assert there is no justification for the society to make every effort, particularly at great expense of money and jobs, to ensure the preservation of endangered species. I concede that this assertion is not without relevant merits; however, people should assume certain responsibility to save endangered species, for the sake of sustainable development of the world.

To begin with, due to human processes, including environmental pollution and inappropriate exploration of natural resources, many species have become extinct every year. For example, clear-cutting of rain forests, pollution of ocean and rivers and the destruction of ozone layer in Antarctica bring about inexorably harmful influences on the habitats of many wild species. Compared with natural processes, anthropogenic factors has been accelerated the rate of extinction of endangered species to a point of threaten the survival of human beings. As it is discussed above, we human have the responsibility to take effective methods to preserve endangered species.

When it comes to the fact that many species have become extinct as a result of natural factors, it might be temping to agree with the author's viewpoint above. Admittedly, some extinction results from the natural process of so-called natural selection, according to Darwinian argument which believes stronger species have more opportunity of survival than weaker ones. However, author overlooks one critical factor which must deserve much attention. That is natural process in which eliminate some species did not bring destructive impacts to the environment, particularly not breaking the balance of the ecosystem. A case in point is the complete extinction of dinosaur in the world, which is caused by natural factors, while other kinds of life could develop continually. However the situation changes a lot when it comes to extinction caused by anthropogenic events. The balance of ecosystem upon which each species depends to survive is disturbed.  Human beings would savor the bitter fruit planted by themselves, and even extinct in the future, if human are not aware of severity of the problem. In a word, the extinction of rare species caused by natural factors cannot serve as an excuse for human’s irresponsibility to ensure the preservation of endangered species.

On the other hand, faced with other numerous pressing problems and infinite resources, it is impossible for human to preserve any endangered species. As we all know, human suffer from some pressing and immediate problems such as hunger, homeless ignorance and the like, therefore I fundamentally agree with author’s assertion it is unjustified for society to make extraordinary efforts to save any endangered species.  By what criteria, then should human decide which species are worth saving and which ones are not? From the psychological side of average people, some species which have harmony relationship with people, or are of certain scientific and medical significance are more likely to receive this propriety. But, there is no logical justification for such criteria. Therefore, the power of ultimate determination should be assigned to biologists and scientists, who have professional knowledge and are more likely to strike a desirable balance between those endangered species.

In conclusion, although many species have become extinct as a result of natural processes, human beings should assume part of responsibility and take affirmative measures to ensure the preservation of endangered species. Faced with infinite energy and resources, biologists and scientists have to choose which endangered species deserve these priorities.
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
3219
注册时间
2004-7-24
精华
2
帖子
4
沙发
发表于 2005-3-17 14:40:33 |只看该作者
自己顶一下!!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
488
注册时间
2004-12-11
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2005-3-18 00:12:39 |只看该作者
[第一次修改别人的文章,不足之处请不吝之处]
As is universally acknowledged, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, instead of human, processes as various times in the geological past. Therefore some people, including the author, assert there is no justification for the society to make every effort, particularly at great expense of money and jobs, to ensure the preservation of endangered species. I concede that this assertion is not without relevant merits; however, people should assume certain responsibility to save endangered species, for the sake of sustainable development of the world.
[文笔很好,句子的结构很好; admire。 不过 修瑞的那本北美范文上说最好在开头段提出ISSUE的复杂性,以表明对文章的insightful analysis]


To begin with, due to human processes, including environmental pollution and inappropriate exploration of natural resources, many species have become extinct every year.[ ] For example, clear-cutting of rain forests, pollution of ocean and rivers and the destruction of ozone layer in Antarctica bring about inexorably harmful influences on the habitats of many wild species[排比的句子用的很好]. Compared with natural processes, anthropogenic factors has been accelerated the rate of extinction of endangered species to a point of threaten the survival of human beings.[这是从正面说,如果让步一下,从反面说,比如 suppose 如果人类不污染环境、一些endangered species will be saved , 会更有说服力。这样也说明对论点有深入的认识] As it is discussed above,[最好能总结说一下,这一切都是因为人为的因素造成的] we human have the responsibility to take effective methods to preserve endangered species.
[B2,B3写的较长,从段落平衡角度,还是多写点儿]

When it comes to the fact that many species have become extinct as a result of natural factors, it might be temping to agree with the author's viewpoint above.  Admittedly, some extinction results from the natural process of so-called natural selection, according to Darwinian argument which believes stronger species have more opportunity of survival   than weaker ones. However, author overlooks one critical factor which must deserve much attention. That is natural process in which eliminate [elimination of ]some species did not bring destructive impacts to the environment, particularly not breaking [break] the balance of the ecosystem. A case in point is the complete extinction of dinosaur in the world, which is caused by natural factors, while other kinds of life could develop continually.[有恐龙的时候,没有人来吧,这个例子当时我也想用] However the situation changes a lot when it comes to extinction caused by anthropogenic events. The balance of ecosystem upon which each species depends to survive is disturbed. Human beings would savor the bitter fruit planted by themselves[吞下苦果,这个用的好。 这个老美能看懂不?应该差不多,看得出你的中文功底也很强], and even extinct in the future, if human are not aware of severity of the problem. In a word, the extinction of rare species caused by natural factors cannot serve as an excuse for human’s irresponsibility to ensure the preservation of endangered species.

On the other hand, faced with other numerous pressing problems and infinite resources, it is impossible for human to preserve any endangered species. [Too general , be specific ]As we all know, human suffer from some pressing and immediate problems such as hunger, homeless ignorance and the like, therefore I fundamentally agree with author’s assertion it is unjustified for society to make extraordinary efforts to save any endangered species.[ 这个和前面承接的有点太唐突] By what criteria, then should human decide which species are worth saving and which ones are not? From the psychological side of average people, some species which have harmony relationship with people, or are of certain scientific and medical significance are more likely to receive this propriety. But, there is no logical justification for such criteria. Therefore, the power of ultimate determination should be assigned to biologists and scientists, who have professional knowledge and are more likely to strike a desirable balance between those endangered species[这个观点提出的好].

In conclusion, although many species have become extinct as a result of natural processes, human beings should assume part of responsibility and take affirmative measures to ensure the preservation of endangered species. Faced with infinite energy and resources, biologists and scientists have to choose which endangered species deserve these priorities.
[ 我也是用这种模板, 长句式用的很多,文字表达能力很好, 句式的多样性也很好。Admire + been incited ]
[如果能再列出specific 的例子,并且针对例子去说明一个论点,会更好]
June 11

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
488
注册时间
2004-12-11
精华
0
帖子
0
地板
发表于 2005-3-18 00:13:36 |只看该作者
第一次修改别人的文章,不足之处请不吝之处
As is universally acknowledged, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, instead of human, processes as various times in the geological past. Therefore some people, including the author, assert there is no justification for the society to make every effort, particularly at great expense of money and jobs, to ensure the preservation of endangered species. I concede that this assertion is not without relevant merits; however, people should assume certain responsibility to save endangered species, for the sake of sustainable development of the world.
文笔很好,句子的结构很好; admire。 不过 修瑞的那本北美范文上说最好在开头段提出ISSUE的复杂性,以表明对文章的insightful analysis


To begin with, due to human processes, including environmental pollution and inappropriate exploration of natural resources, many species have become extinct every year. For example, clear-cutting of rain forests, pollution of ocean and rivers and the destruction of ozone layer in Antarctica bring about inexorably harmful influences on the habitats of many wild species排比的句子用的很好. Compared with natural processes, anthropogenic factors has been accelerated the rate of extinction of endangered species to a point of threaten the survival of human beings.这是从正面说,如果让步一下,从反面说,比如 suppose 如果人类不污染环境、一些endangered species will be saved , 会更有说服力。这样也说明对论点有深入的认识 As it is discussed above,最好能总结说一下,这一切都是因为人为的因素造成的 we human have the responsibility to take effective methods to preserve endangered species.
B2,B3写的较长,从段落平衡角度,还是多写点儿

When it comes to the fact that many species have become extinct as a result of natural factors, it might be temping to agree with the author's viewpoint above.  Admittedly, some extinction results from the natural process of so-called natural selection, according to Darwinian argument which believes stronger species have more opportunity of survival   than weaker ones. However, author overlooks one critical factor which must deserve much attention. That is natural process in which eliminate elimination of some species did not bring destructive impacts to the environment, particularly not breaking break the balance of the ecosystem. A case in point is the complete extinction of dinosaur in the world, which is caused by natural factors, while other kinds of life could develop continually.有恐龙的时候,没有人来吧,这个例子当时我也想用 However the situation changes a lot when it comes to extinction caused by anthropogenic events. The balance of ecosystem upon which each species depends to survive is disturbed. Human beings would savor the bitter fruit planted by themselves吞下苦果,这个用的好。 这个老美能看懂不?应该差不多,看得出你的中文功底也很强, and even extinct in the future, if human are not aware of severity of the problem. In a word, the extinction of rare species caused by natural factors cannot serve as an excuse for human’s irresponsibility to ensure the preservation of endangered species.

On the other hand, faced with other numerous pressing problems and infinite resources, it is impossible for human to preserve any endangered species. Too general , be specific As we all know, human suffer from some pressing and immediate problems such as hunger, homeless ignorance and the like, therefore I fundamentally agree with author’s assertion it is unjustified for society to make extraordinary efforts to save any endangered species. 这个和前面承接的有点太唐突 By what criteria, then should human decide which species are worth saving and which ones are not? From the psychological side of average people, some species which have harmony relationship with people, or are of certain scientific and medical significance are more likely to receive this propriety. But, there is no logical justification for such criteria. Therefore, the power of ultimate determination should be assigned to biologists and scientists, who have professional knowledge and are more likely to strike a desirable balance between those endangered species这个观点提出的好.

In conclusion, although many species have become extinct as a result of natural processes, human beings should assume part of responsibility and take affirmative measures to ensure the preservation of endangered species. Faced with infinite energy and resources, biologists and scientists have to choose which endangered species deserve these priorities.
我也是用这种模板, 长句式用的很多,文字表达能力很好, 句式的多样性也很好。Admire + been incited
如果能再列出specific 的例子,并且针对例子去说明一个论点,会更好
June 11

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
451
注册时间
2005-1-18
精华
0
帖子
1
5
发表于 2005-3-18 14:16:28 |只看该作者
As is universally acknowledged, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, instead of human, processes as various times in the geological past. 我感觉这不是普遍承认的观点,另外,我不太明白你说的process后面的那部份内容Therefore some people, including the authorspeaker, assert there is no justification for the society to make every effort, particularly at great expense of money and jobs, to ensure the preservation of endangered species. I concede that this assertion is not without relevant merits; however, people should assume certain responsibility to save endangered species, for the sake of sustainable development of the world.

To begin with, due to human processes, including environmental pollution and inappropriate exploration of natural resources, many species have become extinct have become extinct:我感觉如果后面的状语是every year的话,这里用完成时不太好吧every year. For example, clear-cutting of rain forests, pollution of ocean and rivers and the destruction of ozone layer in Antarctica bring about inexorably harmful influences on the habitats of many wild species. Compared with natural processes, anthropogenic factors hashave been去掉been accelerated the rate of extinction of endangered species to a point of threaten threatening the survival of human beings. As it is discussed above, we human have the responsibility to take effective methods to preserve endangered species. 我感觉这段的说理不够充分,从举例开始,楼主先说人类行为导致的种种对自然的破坏给野生动物带来了许多不良后果;然后就讲动物的灭绝已经到了威胁人类自身生存的地步,中间并没有讲清楚两者之间是怎样发生联系的,比如说对动物不良后果如何,又是如何威胁人类生存等等,也许找两个例子会好些

When it comes to the fact that many species have become extinct as a result of natural factors, it might be temping tempting to agree with the author's viewpoint above. Admittedly, some extinction results from the natural process of so-called natural selection, according to Darwinian argument which believes stronger species have more opportunity of survival than weaker ones. However, author the speaker overlooks one critical factor which must deserve much attention. That is natural process in which eliminate some species 这个定语从句缺少主语 did do not bring destructive impacts to on the environment, particularly not breaking the balance of the ecosystem. A case in point is the complete extinction of dinosaur in the world, which is caused by natural factorsnatural factors放在这里很模糊, while other kinds of life could develop continually. However the situation changes a lot when it comes to extinction caused by anthropogenic events. The balance of ecosystem upon which each species depends to survive is disturbed.我觉得如你前面列举出来,恐龙是自然选择导致的灭绝一个好的例子,这里要是也举出来一个相对应的例子来说明人类行为导致的物种灭绝更具破坏性,会更好地支持你的观点^_^ Human beings would savor the bitter fruit planted by themselves, and even extinct 这个词好像有点过重 in the future, if human are not aware of severity of the problem. In a word, the extinction of rare species caused by natural factors cannot serve as an excuse for human’s irresponsibility to ensure the preservation of endangered species.

On the other hand, faced with other numerous pressing problems and infinite 这里应该是finite或者limitedresources, it is impossible for human to preserve any endangered species. As we all know, human suffer from some pressing and immediate problems such as hunger, homeless ignorance 什么是homeless ignorance,还望指教and the like, therefore I fundamentally agree with author’s assertion it is unjustified for society to make extraordinary这个词用“”强调指出比较好 efforts to save any endangered species. 这里说的又是另一层意思,用连接词furthermore之类的连一下比较By what criteria, then should human decide which species are worth saving and which ones are not? From the psychological side of average people, some species which have harmony relationship with people, or are of certain scientific and medical significance are more likely to receive this propriety. 我不太懂of certain scientific and medical significance这样的物种是什么物种But, there is no logical justification for such criteria. Therefore, the power of ultimate determination should be assigned to biologists and scientists, who have professional knowledge and are more likely to strike a desirable balance between human beings and those endangered species.

In conclusion, although many species have become extinct as a result of natural processes, human beings should assume part of responsibility and take affirmative measures to ensure the preservation of endangered species. Faced with infinite finite energy and resources, biologists and scientists have to choose which endangered species deserve these priorities.我觉得结尾有点弱,没有完全概括你中间几段提出来的论点

楼主的语言很不错,真的很佩服! 不过有些逻辑上的问题还是不能忽视.我水平有限,只能给你看这么多了,呵呵.我今天也可能写一个issue,等待回拍.
我爱我的兔子,她的名字叫Mary

下一个拐角,就是与幸福的邂逅

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
3219
注册时间
2004-7-24
精华
2
帖子
4
6
发表于 2005-3-18 14:55:33 |只看该作者
As is universally acknowledged, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, instead of human, processes as various times in the geological past. 我感觉这不是普遍承认的观点,另外,我不太明白你说的process后面的那部份内容:  process 后面是题目中的时间状语,呵呵,抄下来也没管
homeless ignorance 中间少了逗号,是指无家可贵  文盲无知两种社会现象
homeless  可能应该是homelessness
其他意见提的很好,谢谢.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
256
注册时间
2004-9-23
精华
0
帖子
0
7
发表于 2005-3-18 16:50:58 |只看该作者
------题目------
At various times in the geological past, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, rather than human, processes. Thus, there is no justification for society to make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
------正文------
As is universally acknowledged, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, instead of human, processes as various times in the geological past. Therefore some people, including the author, assert there is no justification for the society to make every effort, particularly at great expense of money and jobsjobs??? , to ensure the preservation of直接用preserve似乎更流畅   endangered species. I concede that this assertion is not without relevant merits; however, people should assume certain responsibility to save endangered species, for the sake of sustainable development of the world. 属于传统型开头,但好像和题目太相似了

To begin with, due to human processes, including environmental pollution and inappropriate exploration of natural resources, many species have become extinct every year语法错误!. For example, clear-cutting of rain forests, pollution of ocean and rivers and the destruction of ozone layer in Antarctica bring about inexorably harmful influences on the habitats of many wild species. Compared with natural processes, anthropogenic factors has been accelerated the rate of extinction of endangered species to a point of threaten the survival of human beings.好像不太通顺 As it is删去it is discussed above, we human删去human have the responsibility to take effective methods to preserve endangered species.

When it comes to the fact that many species have become extinct as a result of natural factors, it might be temping to agree with the author's viewpoint above. Admittedly, some extinction results from the natural process of so-called natural selection, according to Darwinian argument that believes删去believes,变为同位语从句 stronger species have more opportunity of survival than weaker ones. However, author overlooks one critical factor, which must deserve much more attention. That is natural process in which eliminate some species did not bring destructive impacts to the environment, particularly not breaking the balance of the ecosystem.这句意思看不懂 A case in point is the complete extinction of dinosaur in the world, which is caused by natural factors, while other kinds of life could develop continually去掉while之后. However the situation changes a lot when it comes to extinction caused by anthropogenic events. The balance of ecosystem upon which each species depends to survive is disturbed. Human beings would savor the bitter fruit planted by themselves, and even extinct in the future, if human are not aware of severity of the problem.Why?给个理由先 *^_^* In a word, the extinction of rare species caused by natural factors cannot serve as an excuse for human’s irresponsibility to ensure the preservation of endangered species.这段有点乱, 最好先说完一边再说另一边

On the other hand, faced with other numerous pressing problems and infinite resources难道infinite resources 不是pressing problems?, it is impossible for human to preserve any endangered species. As we all know, human suffer from some pressing and immediate problems such as hunger, homeless ignorance and the like, therefore I fundamentally agree with author’s assertion it is unjustified for society to make extraordinary efforts to save any endangered species. By what criteria, then should human decide which species are worth saving and which ones are not? From the psychological side of average people, some species, which have harmony relationship with people, or are of certain scientific and medical significance, are more likely to receive this propriety. But, there is no logical justification for such criteria. Therefore, the power of ultimate determination should be assigned to biologists and scientists, who have professional knowledge and are more likely to strike a desirable balance between those endangered species.到底该救谁,似乎不用写这么多.  

In conclusion, although many species have become extinct as a result of natural processes, human beings should assume part of responsibility and take affirmative measures to ensure the preservation of endangered species. Faced with infinite energy and resources, biologists and scientists have to choose which endangered species deserve these priorities.

文章里用了很多插入语, 比我强! 第二篇才超时五分,太牛了!  但是有句子大可不必写成那样,语序也略有问题 whethet wrongly or rightly, 仅是我个人看法,有很多可能是按我的习惯给改的,未必对,仅供参考.
回头帮我看一下作文!
https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=256686

By the way, 你是西安人吗?

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
0
寄托币
3346
注册时间
2004-7-14
精华
5
帖子
1
8
发表于 2005-3-20 13:07:35 |只看该作者
Issue121 第2篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧!
------摘要------
作者:寄托家园作文版普通用户 共用时间:50分39秒 535 words
从2005年2月17日10时44分到2005年2月34日11时44分
------题目------
At various times in the geological past, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, rather than human, processes. Thus, there is no justification for society to make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
------正文------
As is universally acknowledged, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, instead of human, processes as various times in the geological past. Therefore some people, including the author, assert there is no justification for the society to make every effort, particularly at great expense of money and jobs, to ensure the preservation of endangered species. I concede that this assertion is not without relevant merits; however, people should assume certain responsibility to save endangered species, for the sake of sustainable development of the world. [感觉段首句你没有回应究竟人类对物种灭绝该不该负责,只说该拯救]

To begin with, due to human processes, including environmental pollution and inappropriate exploration of natural resources, many species have become extinct every year. For example, clear-cutting of rain forests, pollution of ocean and rivers and the destruction of ozone layer in Antarctica bring about inexorably harmful influences on the habitats of many wild species. Compared with natural processes, anthropogenic factors has been accelerated the rate of extinction of endangered species to a point of threaten the survival of human beings. As it is discussed above, we human have the responsibility to take effective methods to preserve endangered species. [清晰,有条理]

When it comes to the fact that many species have become extinct as a result of natural factors, it might be temping to agree with the author's viewpoint above. Admittedly, some extinction results from the natural process of so-called natural selection, according to Darwinian argument which believes stronger species have more opportunity of survival than weaker ones. However, author overlooks one critical factor which must deserve much attention. That is natural process in which eliminate some species did not bring destructive impacts to the environment, particularly not breaking the balance of the ecosystem. A case in point is the complete extinction of dinosaur in the world, which is caused by natural factors, while other kinds of life could develop continually. However the situation changes a lot when it comes to extinction caused by anthropogenic events. The balance of ecosystem upon which each species depends to survive is disturbed. Human beings would savor the bitter fruit planted by themselves, and even extinct in the future, if human are not aware of severity of the problem. In a word, the extinction of rare species caused by natural factors cannot serve as an excuse for human’s irresponsibility to ensure the preservation of endangered species. [1 建议还是把段首句放在前面2恐龙的例子不够好吧,恐龙一般认为是小行星撞击,那次一大部分物种灭绝,打破进化进程。例子和观点可能相反。合适的例子,比如那些一个两个物种的消失,——但还没想到合适的]

On the other hand, faced with other numerous pressing problems and infinite resources, it is impossible for human to preserve any endangered species. As we all know, human suffer from some pressing and immediate problems such as hunger, homeless ignorance and the like, therefore I fundamentally agree with author’s assertion it is unjustified for society to make extraordinary efforts to save any endangered species. By what criteria, then should human decide which species are worth saving and which ones are not? From the psychological side of average people, some species which have harmony relationship with people, or are of certain scientific and medical significance are more likely to receive this propriety. But, there is no logical justification for such criteria. Therefore, the power of ultimate determination should be assigned to biologists and scientists, who have professional knowledge and are more likely to strike a desirable balance between those endangered species. [你想说不可能多拯救,因为能力和如何判断,但段尾句感觉跑了]

In conclusion, although many species have become extinct as a result of natural processes, human beings should assume part of responsibility and take affirmative measures to ensure the preservation of endangered species. Faced with infinite energy and resources, biologists and scientists have to choose which endangered species deserve these priorities.
[窃以为逻辑结构有问题。
1人类造成灭绝。
2自然灭绝没关系,人类灭绝有危害(这个人类该不该保护感觉没有直接联系,除非你是说只该保护人类灭绝的)
3人类不可能也做不到。
建议更扣主题
1 灭绝主要因为人类
2这些灭绝带来了很大的危害。
3不可能也做不到。平衡]

喜欢一种纯净的生活!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
3219
注册时间
2004-7-24
精华
2
帖子
4
9
发表于 2005-3-20 14:34:33 |只看该作者
At various times in the geological past, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, rather than human, processes.Thus, there is no justification for society to make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.题目中说在地质史上不同时代,很多物种由于自然而非人力的因素灭绝.因此说人类没有责任去花很多精力拯救每种濒危动物.

第一段最后一句assume the responsibility 难道不是说人类应该负责吗?

第二段我把地址史上的由自然力造成的灭绝和人类做对比.  历史上即使恐龙灭绝了,但是生命仍然能够在地球上延续.而人类造成的环境破坏会导致生命彻底的终止.性质不一样.

第三段最后只是用很短篇幅延伸一下人类应当如何负责.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
3219
注册时间
2004-7-24
精华
2
帖子
4
10
发表于 2005-3-20 14:39:17 |只看该作者
上面帖子写错了
第二段只得是第三段,自然灭绝没关系,直接回映题目中的第一句话
第三段写的是第四段
认为山羊兄的提纲没有对题目做全面分析

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
0
寄托币
3346
注册时间
2004-7-14
精华
5
帖子
1
11
发表于 2005-3-20 14:54:35 |只看该作者
恩,我当时也斟酌了你的people should assume certain responsibility to save endangered species, for the sake of sustainable development of the world. ,感觉responsibility 针对的是save不是extinction.
恐龙的例子我保留看法,自然灭绝也可能带来致命性打击,所以我觉得这样和人类比较认证不够合适。我们不必和那么突发的自然力比,和缓慢的渐进的物种灭种的自然力比,这样更容易站住脚。
四段末句扩展的方式,各人习惯不同,我不太习惯扩展太多,因为做不做和怎么做是两码事。不过这个无大碍。

欢迎继续指正我的提纲和讨论!

喜欢一种纯净的生活!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
3219
注册时间
2004-7-24
精华
2
帖子
4
12
发表于 2005-3-20 16:34:28 |只看该作者
羊兄的解释越来越郁闷,难到非要说people should assume the responsibility of the extinction of endargerened animals  and take effective to measure to save them 才一定叫负责任吗?
而且题中就是问人类该不该去拯救,为什么一定要回映人类对物种灭绝该不该拯救.
"At various times in the geological past"在地质史上不同时代题目中已经明确给定了一个很大的范围应该包括从地球上有生命的第一天开始.恐龙是自然力造成物种灭绝最有利的一个例子.我并没有去比较什么突发的和缓慢的自然力.只不过是自然力和人力之间的比较.
issue文章我认为题目谈到了一个很复杂的问题,虽然不能无限制的延伸,但思想过于拘谨不成了托福作文.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
3219
注册时间
2004-7-24
精华
2
帖子
4
13
发表于 2005-3-20 16:38:38 |只看该作者
题中明确提出了自然力造成灭绝和人力造成灭决.羊兄既然认为恐龙的例子不可以作为自然力产生灭绝,那请你举一个这方面的例子.也许会说服我.

使用道具 举报

RE: Issue121 第2篇超时5分钟.保护野生动物 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue121 第2篇超时5分钟.保护野生动物
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-256262-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部