寄托家园留学论坛 › 论坛 › 寄托学术类备考版 › GRE作文互动版 › Issue38 这篇还没被拍过，谁帮我拍拍，留链接互拍~~

返回列表

查看: 1399|回复: 8

[i习作temp] Issue38 这篇还没被拍过，谁帮我拍拍，留链接互拍~~ [复制链接]

@amy@
UID：209096

高级会员

Rank: 5 Rank: 5

声望: 1
寄托币: 3052
注册时间: 2005-5-6
精华: 2
帖子: 7

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2005-12-30 12:03:28 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

题目
Issue38 "In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."
翻译：电视时代的读书已经不像以前那么重要了。人们通过看电视学到的和他们读书所能学到的一样多。

**********************************************************
类别：传媒类（总频率57）
**********************************************************
提纲
（1）在电视时代，确实可以通过电视学到一些知识，这种方法由一些好处，比如比较生动，配合着画面易于理解。现在有很多这种电视教育节目，比如教英语、计算机知识等，甚至还有专门的教育频道。

（2）但电视教育也有很多缺点，比如比较被动，观众不能随时选择想要看的东西；节目一旦播过，除非等到重播，观众不能再看到了；讲的内容可能比较简单，不够深入；讲的速度是固定的，不能适合个人的情况；电视节目会不停的插播广告吸引人的注意力，打乱思路；而且看电视过久会严重影响视力，尤其是对孩子。但是通过读书，这些问题就都能避免了，所以读书还是获得知识的无法取代的途径。

（3）虽然在电视时代，人们看电视的时间多了，但并不代表读书就不像以前那么重要了。电视主要是一种娱乐工具。

**********************************************************
字数：476 words
时间：查阅资料（30分钟）+提纲（15分钟）+正文（1小时15分钟） = 2小时
**********************************************************
正文
As we all know, television is very popular and has become the necessary in the era. Since we can learn by watching television, can we assert that television can be the only way to gain knowledge replace of reading books? Can we think reading is not as important as before? I deem the answers are certainly not, and I will explain it from the following facets.

We have to admit that after the absence of television, we have a more way to obtain knowledge and this way indeed has some advantages. For example, television programs are more vivid and comprehensive with the images, which make learning are not so bald. Now there are lots of TV education programs, such as teaching foreign languages, computer operations and the like, moreover, there even have some special education channels. In other words, television does help our learning.

On the other hand, every thing has two sides, so do television, especially when it is compared to reading on the learning facet, it will reveal many disadvantages. Firstly, TV programs are so positive that audience cannot select whatever he want to watch optionally and once a program has been played, audience cannot watch it again unless it is replayed, however, when reading books, people have more selectivity: they can go back or go forward to whichever page they want and they can pick up another book as they like. Secondly, the content of TV program may be relatively simple and not deep enough, so it will not suitable for some realms, such as science research or specialty study. We cannot image the case that we study computer operation system only by watching television. Thirdly, the speed of TV program is fixed, so it is possible to fit everyone. In addition, the TV program is often interrupted by advertisements, which will attract audience's attention and throw audience's train of thought into confusion. What's more, watching television too long will influence the eyesight dramatically, especially to children. After the compares above, we conclude that reading book is still the unshakable way to learn.

Finally, although in television age, people spend more time in watching television and relative less time in reading, it cannot show reading books is not as important as it once was. It is likely that now people are more efficient to find the knowledge they need during reading because the accessorial tools exist, such as index, Internet, or search engine. Admittedly, television is still the entertainment of people's lives.

To sum up, television is indeed a way to learn, but it cannot replace the traditional reading way because reading book has many obvious predominance that television do not possess. Moreover, reading books is still very important, and even more important than before, because the current society is a intellective era, and illiterate or semiliterate will feel hard to live well.

**********************************************************
参考资料
https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mo ... p;highlight=issue38

[ 本帖最后由 @amy@ 于 2006-1-17 16:28 编辑 ]

用心就不会错过...

回应
0

使用道具举报

jingjingtous
UID：2164820

荣誉版主

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9

声望: 6
寄托币: 5599
注册时间: 2005-12-6
精华: 6
帖子: 8

沙发

发表于 2005-12-30 12:31:25 |只看该作者

amy这么快就写好拉，强！

How to Eat Fried Worms?

使用道具举报

@amy@
UID：209096

高级会员

Rank: 5 Rank: 5

声望: 1
寄托币: 3052
注册时间: 2005-5-6
精华: 2
帖子: 7

板凳

发表于 2006-1-2 17:39:16 |只看该作者

大家都去过元旦，没人来了么？

用心就不会错过...

使用道具举报

@amy@
UID：209096

高级会员

Rank: 5 Rank: 5

声望: 1
寄托币: 3052
注册时间: 2005-5-6
精华: 2
帖子: 7

地板

发表于 2006-1-17 09:43:41 |只看该作者

谁帮我拍拍这篇？留链接互拍啊~~

用心就不会错过...

使用道具举报

@amy@
UID：209096

高级会员

Rank: 5 Rank: 5

声望: 1
寄托币: 3052
注册时间: 2005-5-6
精华: 2
帖子: 7

5楼

发表于 2006-1-17 16:28:51 |只看该作者

再顶~~

用心就不会错过...

使用道具举报

智恩
UID：2160717

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 4
注册时间: 2015-4-28
精华: 3
帖子: 44

6楼

发表于 2006-1-17 19:03:57 |只看该作者

提纲
（1）在电视时代，确实可以通过电视学到一些知识，这种方法由一些好处，比如比较生动，配合着画面易于理解。现在有很多这种电视教育节目，比如教英语、计算机知识等，甚至还有专门的教育频道。

（2）但电视教育也有很多缺点，比如比较被动，观众不能随时选择想要看的东西；节目一旦播过，除非等到重播，观众不能再看到了；讲的内容可能比较简单，不够深入；讲的速度是固定的，不能适合个人的情况；电视节目会不停的插播广告吸引人的注意力，打乱思路；而且看电视过久会严重影响视力，尤其是对孩子。但是通过读书，这些问题就都能避免了，所以读书还是获得知识的无法取代的途径。

（3）虽然在电视时代，人们看电视的时间多了，但并不代表读书就不像以前那么重要了。电视主要是一种娱乐工具。

**********************************************************
字数：476 words
时间：查阅资料（30分钟）+提纲（15分钟）+正文（1小时15分钟） = 2小时
**********************************************************
正文
As we all know, television is very popular and has become the necessary in the era. Since we can learn by watching television, can we assert that television can be the only way to gain knowledge replace（replacing，总之这句话用了2个动词，所以要改，但是不知道用ing形式对不对？） of reading books? Can we think reading is not as important as before? I deem the answers are certainly not, and I will explain it from the following facets.

We have to admit that after the absence（好像把意思弄错了，想说出现之类的意思吗？用appearance，或emergence） of television, we have a more way to obtain knowledge and this way indeed has some advantages. For example, television programs are more vivid and comprehensive with the images, which make learning are not so bald. Now there are lots of TV education programs, such as teaching foreign languages, computer operations and the like, moreover, there even have some special education channels. In other words, television does help our learning.

On the other hand, every thing has two sides, so do television, especially when it is compared to reading on the learning facet, it will reveal many disadvantages. Firstly, TV programs are so positive（passive，positive是积极的意思，呵呵一定是写得太着急了） that audience cannot select whatever he want to watch optionally and once a program has been played, audience cannot watch it again unless it is replayed, however, when reading books, people have more selectivity: they can go back or go forward to whichever page they want and they can pick up another book as they like. Secondly, the content of TV program may be relatively simple and not deep enough, so it will not suitable for some realms, such as science research or specialty study. We cannot image the case that we study computer operation system only by watching television. Thirdly, the speed of TV program is fixed, so it is possible to fit everyone. In addition, the TV program is often interrupted by advertisements, which will attract audience's attention and throw audience's train of thought into confusion. What's more, watching television too long will influence the eyesight dramatically, especially to children（但是我觉得看书看久了也会影响视力）. After the compares above, we conclude that reading book is still the unshakable way to learn.

Finally, although in television age, people spend more time in watching television and relative less time in reading, it cannot show reading books is not as important（换衣下，vital） as it once was. It is likely that now people are more efficient to find the knowledge they need during reading because the accessorial tools exist, such as index（是数据库的意思吗?我一直不晓得用这个可以怎么查资料，有点孤陋寡闻呵呵）, Internet, or search engine. Admittedly, television is still the entertainment of people's lives.

To sum up, television is indeed a way to learn, but it cannot replace the traditional reading way because reading book（books） has many obvious predominance that television do not possess. Moreover, reading books is still very important, and even more important than before, because the current society is a（an） intellective era, and illiterate or semiliterate will feel hard to live well

使用道具举报

智恩
UID：2160717

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 4
注册时间: 2015-4-28
精华: 3
帖子: 44

7楼

发表于 2006-1-17 19:05:49 |只看该作者

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... ge=1&highlight=
帮我看看吧，这篇也没被改到
谢谢拍砖！！

使用道具举报

savagett
UID：2134686

高级会员

Rank: 5 Rank: 5

声望: 2
寄托币: 1531
注册时间: 2005-9-2
精华: 1
帖子: 16

8楼

发表于 2006-1-17 20:08:53 |只看该作者

As we all know, television is very popular and has become the necessary (a necessary的用法好像比较多)in the era. Since we can learn by watching television, can we assert that television can be（可能换个情态动词更好） the only way to gain knowledge replace of reading books?（这个句子动词好像多了点） Can we think reading is not as important as before? I deem the answers are certainly not, and I will explain it from the following facets.

We have to admit that after the absence of television, we have a more way（a better way?another way?） to obtain knowledge and this way indeed has some advantages. For example, television programs are more vivid and comprehensive with the images, which make learning are not so bald. Now there are lots of TV education programs, such as teaching foreign languages, computer operations and the like, moreover, there even have some special education channels. In other words, television does help our learning.

On the other hand, every thing has two sides, so do television, especially when it is compared to reading on the learning facet, it will reveal many disadvantages(reveal这个动词用的有点怪). Firstly, TV programs are so positive that audience cannot select whatever he want to watch optionally and once a program has been played, audience cannot watch it again unless it is replayed, however, when reading books, people have more selectivity: they can go back or go forward to whichever page they want and they can pick up another book as they like. Secondly, the content of TV program may be relatively simple and not deep enough, so it will not suitable for some realms, such as science research or specialty study. We cannot image the case that we study computer operation system only by watching television. Thirdly, the speed of TV program is fixed, so it is possible to fit everyone（impossible）. In addition, the TV program is often interrupted by advertisements, which will attract audience's attention and throw audience's train of thought into confusion. What's more, watching television too long will influence the eyesight dramatically, especially to children. After the compares above, we conclude that reading book is still the unshakable way to learn.

Finally, although in television age, people spend more time in watching television and relative less time in reading, it cannot show reading books is not as important as it once was. It is likely that now people are more efficient to find the knowledge（我还是觉得动词有点点问题，用get会不会好点呢？） they need （意思多余了点吧）during reading because the accessorial tools exist, such as index, Internet, or search engine（这连个差不多吧）. Admittedly, television is still the entertainment tool of people's lives.

To sum up, television is indeed a way to learn, but it cannot replace the traditional reading way because reading book has many obvious predominance that television do not possess(tv是用单数还是复数的呢？). Moreover, reading books is still very important, and even more important than before, because the current society is a intellective era, and illiterate or semiliterate will feel hard to live well.

我第一次改,不好意思.
我觉得你的结构很好,平衡的观点,首先是有保留的赞成了作者观点,然后提出了反对的观点,读书才是最好的获得教育的方式,最后还强调了电视还是用来娱乐的.
最后结论的时候,谈到了文盲和社会,是不是稍微有点远了呢?我个人意见哦.......

使用道具举报