小组作业issue143by whtkd　- [复制链接]

whtkd
UID：2435066

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 85
注册时间: 2007-12-5
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2009-6-15 15:47:10 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

artist shlould pay little attention to their critics.criticism tends to undermine and constrain the artist's creativity.

The issue of whether  artist need to ignore the critics or pay attetion to critics is a worth discussion . different people have a various opinion due to their life experience and personal knowledge.some people may argue that artist should pay more attention to critics, on the contrary ,the other's view might be opposit . it is constrovaril issue involving with the philosophical contention .I ,as a personal perspectiv,agree with that artis should not pay little attention to their critic in order no to miss something maybe a valuable suggestion.

Firstly.artist work indenpantly in their idea and imagination to end the art which is a essential element in every step from begin to the end .I concede that without ingenious artist to compose the idea and constuction ,ther will be not critic at all. artist is a high position not one can subsititute on their creation . as a matter of fact ,no matter how artist professional or genuis is,it is impossible for him or her to achieve the art with any critic in the process or any feedback to their art .specifically ,as for critic will bring about valuble suggestion or different idea to help artist think more further and completional. if artist just stand or adamantly uphold their opinon is perfectly and to repel someone from every conscientious suggestion ,conseqencely ,the art will not every creative or diverse if stay in isolation.

  Secondly,critic can play a consderiable role in artist aesthetic appricaiton. theorticaly or practically ,art is meaningless if without culture presentive or voice from majority of people to admit. as a critic is other access for art to accumulate more detial information or culture to stimulate their inspiration. on the othe hand ,there is gap between artist and layperson.who is going to be a bridge .it is critic for their evluation or interpretation make common people easily to understand the artist's composal.it is exstremely difficulty for masses ,layperson ,to enjoy any art in front of them .if artist overlook the masses or the predominated culture existing in our society ,he will be constrained his creativity .it is alway a common phenomenon give us imagination .critic with their insightful version and work experience to bridge between layperson and artist.

  However .poor criticism or critic taken to the extrem might impact on artist's belief and faith on art .it is no double everything go to extreme will be counterproductive .if critic to issue any opinion to art without any constructive point of view,it might not work for enhance artist's creativity.it might sabotage the artist's creation if they excessive interfere in work of art. for example ,if beijing opera concern too much crtique from other country ,and lose our historical culture .being opera will not represent one of chinese indigenous culture. as a artist must possess the ability to synthesize different evalution and absorb what it help them.

  To sum up ,critic provider other evalution and find the different view with artist to improve the completion of art .critic give artist feedback about what do the audience think .artist learn much from this way that it is more comprehensive idea to produce more diverse art. without critic ,artist may be in isolation to restrain their mind .artist creativity effected by extremely critic .as a result,artist need to work hard to produce more valuable art while caustious to adopte critic in some way.