[i习作temp] 谁能帮我看下作文感激不尽~！Issue 69 [复制链接]

powerbao
UID??2594440

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 69
注册时间: 2009-1-23
精华: 0
帖子: 1

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2009-4-22 21:24:51 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

我考 10G的 QQ7997978  欢迎高手指点  我现在作文愁的要死

Issue 69
"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"

The speaker suggests that government shouldn't place any restrictions on scientific research and development. I concede that to some extent the restrictions from government would fetter the development of science. However, in my view, what we actually need is a balance standard rather than geting rid of all restrictions from the government, the potential benefits we get from the appropriate restrictions also necessary to promote the development of science.
To begin with, I have to concede that the exorbitant restriction from government would make the scientific research lose its original meaning--pursue the trues of nature, even become the tools manipulated by some cabals. Consider, for example, During WW II, Japanese government have organize scientists to develop biochemistry weapons, which were regarded as the taboo for their inhumanity by the most governments of the world. As a result, millions people were brutally killed as the trier of these satanic researches, and even more people were killed by the production of those bloody researches. For the reason that the governments could easily influence the aim of scientific research through their authority, it's necessary for the governments to do their best to reduce the inapt restrictions on scientific research.
However, although these unreasonable restrictions distort the aim of scientific research, we shouldn't ignore the positive side of the apt restrictions, without which few researches could work
effectively.
First, in this era with rapid technological development, any research on science based on a vast sum of fund which was provided by the government. To support these material base also could be considered as a type of restriction. Like the Apollo program supported by American government,  which has consume the government such large account of money as $25.4 billion in 12 years, if not for such forceful support it get from the government,  even the sagest one couldn't sent the astronaut to the space. For the reason that scientific research can't be finish without money, the government's research budget is a part-and-parcel that determine whether a experiment could reach its achievement.
Second, the governments' puissance would make it possible for those enormous plan on science to come true, for they could organize the scientists to work together to do the most spiny research.  To prove this point, we need look no further than the example of Human Genome Project, which was regarded as the result of cooperation between nations. Apart from the large material support provided by different governments, we should thank to the connection between governments, which leaded the scientists from different countries work on this huge but important project, and thus bring the world such heart-stirring future as genic therapy. So in this respect, the restrictions of government on scientific research have their merits.
In sum, I concede that restrictions from government might sometimes hurt the scientific research and develepment. Nonetheless, to some extent some reasonable restrictions were helpful--or even indispensable. In the final analysis, the optimal approach, in my view, is to create a balance standard that obsorb the beneficial restrictions, and spurn the harmful ones.