[i习作temp] ISSUE17 写文速度慢的小女子拜谢求指点！ [复制链接]

天景
UID: 2658456

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 20
注册时间: 2009-6-29
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2009-8-10 13:22:00 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

写了这篇，时间不够用又补了十五分钟，刚够500，完全被打击了TVT
但我还是要发上来拜求大家的继续打击~~~真是不知道自己逻辑和语言哪个比哪个烂~
这文能得3.5么？拜谢指点的各位了先~~~~~~~~~~

=========================================================
TOPIC: ISSUE17 - "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."

The statement actually consist of two claims. First, laws are of two kinds to us : just and unjust. Second, every individual in a socirty has a responsibility to disobey and resist unjust laws,or at least obey just law.As far as I'am concerned, I basically agree that not all laws are nodultly just, but I persisit that resisting the law is not a most important responsibility to a member of society.

First of all, orders and peace of a society is needed,which requies broadly admitted and accepted by most peole. For individuals, only when everyone sees obeying the laws as essential responsibility and ethic, there can be a possibility of harmony society. If laws accord with the above standards, we should obey laws. If laws no longer benefit the majority of the citizens, but do harm to individuals, everyone in a society need to disobey and resist unjust laws.For instance, during the American Civil Rights Movement, people recognized laws are unjust, tried to resist it to get equality, ultimately contributed to ending racial discrimination. And laws today are more just.So it is necessary to resist laws which are out-of-date, to protect people's rights.

What's more,the claim that there are two types of laws which devided into just or unjust ones are not accurate. A society needs a system of law to ensure the benefit and wellfare of the majority of its people, which due to deminish the goods of a small part of groups or individuals. As a result, just or unjust laws is just a respective concept judege by different people, like the ban against chaoxianxxx on researches on nuclear weapons,the UN punished North Korea for the international peace and harmony, but North Korea deemed this law as unjust. That's to say, most of the times, "unjust law" to some ones is espacially important to protect the whole interests and harmony of most people in our sosiety.

However, it has to be admitted that laws are always imperfect , which call for continuely editted and renewed with the development of socoety anf democracy. Even if a law is actually tabled as an unjust one, the best and most important massure is anything but resisting against it, which brings about conflicts and struggles but not suggestions and expierences. There are numberous of solutions to improve them, for example, Martin Luther King gave lectures and appealed to the mass and medias to fight against the unfair laws' discrimiation to black people in US, and it came out to be success to adjust the laws.

For what has been dicussed above,we can safely arrive at the conclusion that no law is absolutely just or unjust. In some respects, laws must be forced upon in order to ensure security and interests of the majority of people, while in other respects, laws should be flexible enough to satisfy individuals as many as possible. So individuals need to be more rational to judge laws and should take more rational reactions to unjust laws.

回应
1

使用道具举报

herara
UID: 2680518

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 119
注册时间: 2009-8-10
精华: 0
帖子: 2

沙发

发表于 2009-8-10 20:52:50 |只看该作者

姐姐你还多长时间考试还有时间我就拍你一下你第一段写的非常糟糕啊错别字好几处社会都给写错了啊还有语言也太中文化了啊你的观点抛的也不强硬你下面怎么说啊

你别灰心我一开始半天也写不出一个字不如你的我要提醒你两点希望对你有帮助吧
1. 别太在意字数
2. 破题一定要狠语言错误不要出现在第一段中间你随便写了衔接要适当写不完没关系的你写了这么多第一段的立意很模糊啊你以后要怎么说啊

【2025FALL】全站祈福已开放~~来领祈福章，求offer得offer

使用道具举报