Adults have the right to vote; so should adolescent. Admittedly, adolescents and adults are not the same. But to the extent that adolescents and adults are different, adults cannot be expected to represent the interests of adolescents. If adults cannot represent the interests of adolescents, then only by giving adolescents the vote will these interests be represented.
(A) The right to vote is a right that all human beings should have.
(B) Adolescents and adults differ in most respects that are important
(C) Adolescents should have their interests represented
(D) Anyone who has the right to vote has all the rights an adult has
(E) Adolescents have never enjoyed the right to vote
我不知道为什么不选B,答案是C
你好,刚好看完bible assumption这一张,说一下我的一点想法
这道题有两个解题角度
角度一.数学推导
premise 1:adolescent vote
premise 2(废话): adolescent and adults different 推出interest different推出adults cannot represent(楼主你中计了~~~)
conclustion:then only by giving adolescents the vote will these interests be represented.
(即 interests be represented推出 adolescent vote)
这里的assumtion是supporter,所以正确答案是interests be represented,正好就是c
2.bible LR讲的很清楚啊!如果conclution里有condition,那么!那么!assumption就是在protect the necessary condition!因此关键piece 都是conclution 里的!c的negation就是:adolescent can represent themselves,这很attack this argument~~~