求解LSAT逻辑题中assumption类的一题

HapgooUID: 3520704

Adults have the right to vote; so should adolescent. Admittedly, adolescents and adults are not the same. But to the extent that adolescents and adults are different, adults cannot be expected to represent the interests of adolescents. If adults cannot represent the interests of adolescents, then only by giving adolescents the vote will these interests be represented.
(A)           The right to vote is a right that all human beings should have.
(B)           Adolescents and adults differ in most respects that are important
(C)           Adolescents should have their interests represented
(D)           Anyone who has the right to vote has all the rights an adult has
(E)           Adolescents have never enjoyed the right to vote
我不知道为什么不选B，答案是C

gzkimiUID: 3569156

通篇都是讲青少年不该被成年人代表，成年与青少年不同，但是都没说两者间差异的地方很重要啊，所以B发散了。A,D,E是原文根本没有涉及的问题，所以都不用用看了

deronluUID: 3588780

文章强调的是adolescent与adult的利益诉求是存在差异的，正是这个差异性决定了后者的诉求并不能代表前者的诉求。西方不是有句古话叫“无代表，不纳税”吗

晚晚zhangUID: 3666620

你好，刚好看完bible assumption这一张，说一下我的一点想法
这道题有两个解题角度
角度一.数学推导
premise 1：adolescent vote
premise 2(废话): adolescent and adults different 推出interest different推出adults cannot represent(楼主你中计了～～～)
conclustion：then only by giving adolescents the vote will these interests be represented.
                 （即 interests be represented推出 adolescent vote）
这里的assumtion是supporter，所以正确答案是interests be represented，正好就是c

2.bible LR讲的很清楚啊！如果conclution里有condition，那么！那么！assumption就是在protect the necessary condition！因此关键piece 都是conclution 里的！c的negation就是：adolescent can represent themselves，这很attack this argument~~~

还有就是，早conclution!!!我觉得最后一句后半段才是conclution,除了第一句之外全是废话！！洋鬼子好好的话不会好好的说～～～

大家觉得呢