[i习作temp] ISSUE83 【Aero小组】第11次作业 by bigyan [复制链接]

bigyan
UID: 2382427

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 2
寄托币: 439
注册时间: 2007-8-14
精华: 0
帖子: 1

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2008-2-2 14:59:37 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

The speaker asserts that though some areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people, the government should preserve the areas in their natural state. In my view, which kind of action government should take should be determined on a case-to-case basis and should account for the historic consideration and the public will
First and foremost, having recognized the great historic value of the land, the government of course must take responsibility for the preventing from breaking the natural state. It is true that the free overexploitation in the area may carry an undesirable consequence that can not repair any more. For supporting example, though a site is often remote, any kind of cave or structure is a sign of the bygone culture and history. If a government would like to raze it to build a shopping mall that is of help for the economic improvement, there is a egregious lose that neither the historic value or the research at the history is undermined forever. This illustrates that whether the government preserve the area depends on the consideration on the historic value as well as the protection for the ancient culture, either of which outweighs any economic need far away. In short, the government should stand to learn that focus on the importance of the history serve to the research at the history and contribute to the offspring.
Secondly, the history informed us that the many kinds of extraordinarily valuable species in the wild area easily extinct with the interrupt from the outside. If the government takes advantage of the resource in the area, the exploration of the biosphere will ruin the established balance. Conversely, the government needs to design relative laws to ensure human being away from the area. For example, in China, a forest elected for panda provide a comfortable biosphere, thus the number of the species has greatly increased year after year. Without the protection for the area, another species will extinct from the world one day.
Finally, apart from the historic value and protection for the species, the practical need should be considered deeply before coming to conclusion. In my view, the path to success is to strike a balance among competing interest. Admittedly, competing with the research or history is the current needs now. For example, if the wild area does not maintain lots of historic value, the government can use the resource to build markets and houses under the control, both of which bring out millions of dollar for the area. And if the residence is facing the problem of the absence of the hospitals and doctors, the best way to satisfy the want is to build enough the hospital or the medicinal school. Consequently, the government should fully utilize the land to meet the practical need when the experts ensure that there is no danger to the historic site.
In conclusion, whether the government should preserve the area is not simple as we imagine. To be better for the offspring, we should realize the historic value takes a pole in the research of the history .To stabilize the society, we should concentrate on the practical need concerning the way people live.

do not wake me up