[i习作temp] issue17[Aero小组14次作业] [复制链接]

sallyplumage
UID: 2343965

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 0
寄托币: 209
注册时间: 2007-5-29
精华: 0
帖子: 6

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2008-2-18 23:48:36 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

issue17
"There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."

Should every individual in a society have a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws? In a sense, I tend agree that we should obey just laws because I can use them to protect myself. However, I do not completely side with this statement because the speaker claims the view by overlooking the crucial role of another issue and unfairly give them a second priority. In my point of view, all-side consideration is needed when deciding the precedence.

First of all, without just and unjust law a society cannot be expected to be able to observe it because everything has another side. To illustrate this point clearly, we can see that the government of our city restricts the quantity and breed of dogs for controlling the quantity of the dog without master and preventing hydrophobia. However, some one thinks it is terrible because they must leave their lovely friends. The reason is that they have not enough money to pay the government every year and the law thinks this kind of dog is dangerous. Animal is our friends who can help our leave bed temper so my dog is my family member, which the government overlooks. At same times many kinds of animals like cats also can infect diseases, but the government only restricts the quantity and breed of dogs.

Furthermore, it goes without saying that which ages the law is obeyed in. In order to see this point clearly, let us see an example. In a long time most people think the homoerotism is a disease , but today many people accept the face and some country allow the queers to marry such as Belgium(2003)、Holland (2001)and Canada(2005).Certain standards for enforcement and judgment must of course be followed, but a certain amount of allows should advance. Sometime unjust law will be just in certain age.

Finally, for a legal system to work for a society, the laws must be knowable, fair and implemented equally among the population. If some people think this law is just and obey it, but some don not think so, so this law is not useful. When all soldiers obey the order they believe it is just, the war will do not win.

To sum up, these is no fixed standard for judgment of the just laws and unjust laws. Due to analysis and reasons mentioned above, which sometimes correlates with each other to generate a integrated whole and thus because more persuasive than any signal one of them, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that we can not obey and disobey laws blindly.

[ 本帖最后由 sallyplumage 于 2008-2-19 00:01 编辑 ]

回应
0

使用道具举报

hziu2
UID: 2326409

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 149
注册时间: 2007-4-11
精华: 0
帖子: 0

沙发

发表于 2008-2-19 21:00:15 |只看该作者

Should every individual in a society have a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws? In a sense, I tend agree that we should obey just laws because I can use them to protect myself. However, I do not completely side with this statement because the speaker claims the view by overlooking the crucial role of another issue and unfairly give them a second priority. In my point of view, all-side consideration is needed when deciding the precedence.

First of all, without just and unjust law a society cannot be expected to be able to observe it because everything has another side. To illustrate this point clearly, we can see that the government of our city restricts the quantity and breed of dogs for controlling the quantity of the dog without master and preventing hydrophobia. However, some one thinks (many people would think that )it is terrible because they must leave their lovely friends. The reason is that they have not enough money to pay the government every year and the law thinks this kind of dog is dangerous (so their dog is considered to be dangerous). Animal is our friends who can help our leave bed temper so my dog is my family member, which the government overlooks. At same times many kinds of animals like cats also can infect diseases, but the government only restricts the quantity and breed of dogs. 楼主在这要下个结论会比较好，要说明政府在维护大众安全上要对养狗采取措施，虽然有人认为这样对狗是残忍的，但要遵守法律配合法律才能达到维护社会安定的目的。

Furthermore, it goes without saying that which ages the law is obeyed in. In order to see this point clearly, let us see an example. In a long time most people think the homoerotism is a disease , but today many people accept the face and some country allow the queers to marry such as Belgium(2003)、Holland (2001)and Canada(2005).Certain standards for enforcement and judgment must of course be followed, but a certain amount of allows should advance. Sometime unjust law will be just in certain age. 这里是说明法律会有一定的灵活性吧，楼主应该练习写主题句，才能使文章清楚明了。

Finally, for a legal system to work for a society, the laws must be knowable, fair and implemented equally among the population. If some people think this law is just and obey it, but some don not think so, so this law is not useful. When all soldiers obey the order they believe it is just, the war will do not win.

To sum up, these is no fixed standard for judgment of the just laws and unjust laws. Due to analysis and reasons mentioned above, which sometimes correlates with each other to generate a integrated whole and thus because more persuasive than any signal one of them, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that we can not obey and disobey laws blindly.
我想说的是楼主应该多分析下北美范文是怎样层层或并列的论述观点的。
文章的思路不太清楚，想是因为缺乏主题句的原因。我想楼主应该下笔之前把每段的主旨要理清楚，这样对写文章会有好处。
语言方面还是显得生涩了，我想楼主应该好好练习写陈述性的语言，避免例子中出现以自己为例说明的现象，那样会减少文章的客观性。

[ 本帖最后由 hziu2 于 2008-2-19 21:23 编辑 ]

安静的等待生命中能够改变我的人和事如期而至．

【2025FALL】全站祈福已开放~~来领祈福章，求offer得offer

使用道具举报