寄托天下
查看: 1008|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[未归类] 借argument165问个问题 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
252
注册时间
2006-8-17
精华
0
帖子
2
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2008-10-10 21:42:56 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
165. The following appeared in a business magazine.

"As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness and nausea, Promofoods requested that eight million cans of tuna be returned for testing last year. Promofoods concluded that the cans did not, after all, contain chemicals that posed a health risk. This conclusion is based on the fact that the chemists from Promofoods tested samples of the recalled cans and found that, of the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find that the three remaining suspected chemicals are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods."

对于这篇文章,我们可以攻击 promofood用自己的chemists会使结果不可靠么?(感觉这算主观揣测)

另外问时态的问题:在引用"Promofoods concluded that the cans did not..."时,想说
The arguer said that ...
后面要用一般过去时还是过去完成时?
回应
0

使用道具 举报

RE: 借argument165问个问题 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
借argument165问个问题
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-883707-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部