本帖最后由 艾尘草 于 2009-3-12 14:27 编辑
In this argument, the author suggested that other college and university(复数) should adopt the honor codes similar to Groven's to reduce the amount of cheating matters in examination. Yet the author attempted to explain the benefit of honor code(s), I (can)hardly seem(这个地方是see还是什么?) the logical(?这个是形容词~) between the illustration and the conclusion.
Firstly, the date(data?) in the argument couldn't argue(我觉得argue可不可以换成是suppose) the cheating amounts cutting down. For the author only shows the cheating amounts after the measure is carried into execution(缺少主句). It is possible that(这个表达可以更换一下,觉得有点中文的感觉) the average amount of cheating is justly twenty-five before the measure, so that the honor code can't be proven far more successful. Moreover the author didn't indict(indict是起诉的意思,这里是不是想说 indicate) the amounts of cheating in five years; the number of cheating possibly was great in five years and justly(just) dropped at the fifth year.
Even if the number of cheating was really descended(被动语态?此处用have descended是不是更好呢?) in the past, it can't prove the decrease of cheating was leaded by(希望能更换下表达) the honor code(s). The author is failing to(这个表达) consider other possible alternatives to the reducing cheating after adopt honor code. Such alternatives may include the fact that the difficulty of examination was reduced, which students didn't need cheating for high mark(s); (这个地方的标点应该是逗号吧~)or the quality of the teaching is(时态) developed, the students could absorb the knowledge comprehensive(comprehension), they could easily confront the examination; or the faculty member weaken the extent of monitor, so that the possibility of cheating detected was reduced.
Further more, there are few disfigurements in the survey, the sample of survey could be only the student who’s good at study or the student of character, the sample didn't choose randomly(这个词汇赞一个~). And the survey was accomplished by the Groveton honor council; there maybe had (句式)disposition in the survey.
Even through the decrease of cheating amounts is related with the honor code, it couldn't affirm the conduct that other colleges and universities adopt the honor codes is apposite. The phenomenon of cheating in examination is related to many factors, for instance, the aptitude of pedagogue, the ambience of study, the morality of students(这几个并列好有气势啊~), etc.
To sum up, the author failed to discuss the fact that the honor code could reduce the number of cheating. To reduce the number of cheating in examination, the college could innovate in other aspect.
呵呵 我的拙见: 优点:这个文章思路很清晰(看起来很舒服)攻击点也很充分(好佩服~忽忽~~)不过鉴于大家要共同进步,我觉得有些问题的地方我就直言不讳了~0~ 作者是通过几点论述的 1.这五年的数据不具有代表意义(但是希望可以增加一些理由来说明二段最后一句话,比如举出其他原因的例子说明作弊人数的骤然变化这样可以使文章更具有说服力)
2五年的调查可能又其他的因素干扰(这段的文字举了好多例子,感觉很充实~很喜欢,呵呵~但是希望能够注意一下单复数喝句型结构,以及英语里的标点符号,注意;和,的使用~) 3.选出来的个体不具有代表型(我个人认为这段可以并在前面,因为这个段落看起来很单薄) 4其他影响作弊上升的因素(这个放在第一段就好了~因为这个好象是最大的应该论证的地方把~~呵呵) |