- 最后登录
- 2018-7-1
- 在线时间
- 405 小时
- 寄托币
- 47007
- 声望
- 37
- 注册时间
- 2004-3-30
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 25
- 精华
- 8
- 积分
- 14352
- UID
- 160003
- 声望
- 37
- 寄托币
- 47007
- 注册时间
- 2004-3-30
- 精华
- 8
- 帖子
- 25
|
Issue10
Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
提纲:
1。部分同意:政府应该支持,否定城市保存发源文化传统
2。反驳城市保存发源文化传统
3。政府应该支持的两个理由:政府的责任,大城市重要地位
4。不能无节制支持,应当调节发展
5。总结
With the rapid economic development, cities play an increasingly significant role in the whole society and catch much more attention from people than before. The advocacy that governments must meet their major cities' need by offer financial support is somewhat reasonable but the reason provided that it is in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated seems ungrounded from my opinion.
Above all, the claim that major cities have not only conserved but also generated much more of a nation's traditions than other places is open to doubt.(口可口可,前面很像狗狗的说,不过立场很清晰滴) As a common sense, from one aspect, the urbanization serves to establish so called "international metropolises", which absorb all kinds of alien cultures as part of their own. As a result, the big cities are going to be with(be with->share酱紫好8好?) more similarities although they are located in different places on the earth. For instance, Shanghai, one of the major cities in China, is such a typical international metropolis(上海好像还算不得,借个好象要求外籍常住人口比例的说,题外话哈 :cool: ), but(为什么转折嘞?) what you can see there is something almost same to New York. Towers though stand on the land of Shanghai, are designed by famous European or American or Japanese architects; reputed brands appear in the departments as common as in every other big city out of China(介个说法...). We cannot make sense to long for an indeed Chinese style there. The process of urbanization might do more on depriving the traditions from the major cities of a nation. From another aspect, it is more likely that countryside or small towns rather than major cities do help to preserve and generate a country's traditions, due to the less impact on them exerted by the urbanization process. Much less invaded and colonized(!) by the foreign cultures, these relatively small sites may keep more customs original. When Beijing's historical civilian houses, which carry some kind of traditional life style, are demolished, to people’s surprise, Pingyao, a very small town gradually becomes celebrated for its preserving of those(介个指代好远啊) under a sound situation. So it is primarily in places(?) other than major cities that a nation's culture could be preserved and generated.(这段重点应该是后半段8,感觉前面不用太详细,简单说明就好乐,有点喧宾夺主的说 :rolleyes: )
Although the reason claimed is questionable, governments still should support the cities within the extent it can reach for two causes. On the one hand, a government has the responsibility to buttress major cities in finance. Since government is an institution to deal with national affairs and plan for the future development of the whole state, it is its obligation to try its best to meet the needs of every part of the nation, of course enveloping the major cities. On the other hand, major cities are the most important source of national taxes income, so the extent of how they are (可以直接用主动8?)developed is relative to the whole country's financial situation. As the bone of the country, major cities need appropriations large enough to launch their plans toward the goal to be more prosperous. As an illustration, without the government’s subsidy, it is entirely impossible for Athens to win the chance to hold the Olympic Games in 2004 and due to this, the whole country would enjoy the benefits brought about by the Games.(偶觉得介个例子用北京挺不赖滴 :p ) So it is meaningful to meet their(whose?) needs in finance for further and faster developments.
However, such a point does not stand for immoderate content to the major cities. When country is taken into account as a whole, including major cities, small towns and countryside, it would be unwise to give major cites permanent priority to others without a well-rounded consideration about the reality. For example, should a country like Uganda put its people who are mostly living out of cities and in famine aside and empty its purse to meet its capital’s needs? A big NO would be the only answer. (!)What is more essential of governments’ work is to reach a coordinated development of major cities, small cites, towns and countryside in the scope of the whole country. A state in a situation with palmy big cities only is somewhat like a lame person, who can merely advance by dragging his hurt leg slowly and arduously.( :rolleyes: 不赖,忽然想到“木桶原理”是不是也可以用到这里?) So governments should not focus narrowly on the development of major cities and give them financial supports with overlooking the full view. 前面已经有一大段在说支持城市的好处,这段是不是可以从乡村不可忽视的角度来讲?又多了!
In sum, governments surely should appropriate to the major cities and meet their needs under a condition that such subsidies neither are beyond the governments’ capability, nor do harm to the coordinated development of the whole country. But instead of the reason that a nation’s cultural traditions are primarily preserved and generated in them, this support is with an eye to prompt the major cities to make progress and then, to propel the whole economic development of the nation.(775words)
很显然,又超时了……继续努力吧!!!!没什么别的好说的了。
补:夜里太困了,有几个单复数之类的问题刚才才修改好。改了个别的一两个词。请看吧!
needle的语言一直令人羡慕,学习学习!
如果是我写,大概会把应该支持城市发展的部分作为让步,略写
因为我感觉题目的重点是保护文化传统,needle提到滴很少
水平有限,仅供参考 :cool: |
|