寄托家园留学论坛 › 论坛 › 寄托学术类备考版 › GRE作文互动版 › 若只是想取得3.5的作文，应该怎么做？

返回列表

查看: 2031|回复: 6

[问题求助] 若只是想取得3.5的作文，应该怎么做？ [复制链接]

tmdxlp
UID：2745223

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 71
寄托币: 1192
注册时间: 2010-1-3
精华: 0
帖子: 147

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2010-3-10 12:52:21 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

时间来不及了20天，并且有工作，一天加上背单词的时间，大概共有6个小时左右，申请的专业也没有要求要gre，但是为了对得起报名费，还是觉得要认真对待，但不敢奢望能分数多高，只想拿个3.5分，我应该怎么做呢？请大家指教一下……谢谢

回应
0

使用道具举报

kay8815
UID：2668603

高级会员

Rank: 5 Rank: 5

声望: 5
寄托币: 1598
注册时间: 2009-7-20
精华: 0
帖子: 9

沙发

发表于 2010-3-10 15:52:53 |只看该作者

大众低分现在都是3.0了。。。3，5的话建议argu好好准备拿4分，issue不要太烂3分还挺好拿。

使用道具举报

lampard89
UID：2137729

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 0
寄托币: 522
注册时间: 2005-9-12
精华: 0
帖子: 4

板凳

发表于 2010-3-10 16:15:18 |只看该作者

作文不用背单词吧？LZ专心复习AW就是了

使用道具举报

草木也知愁
UID：2487572

永久会员

Rank: 16

声望: 3963
寄托币: 23288
注册时间: 2008-1-2
精华: 50
帖子: 2209

地板

发表于 2010-3-10 16:43:54 |只看该作者

ISSUE和ARGUMENT单独评分然后算平均评分标准在下面自己算就可以了

评分标准：

Perspective on an Issue
________________________________
Score 6
A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the complexities of the issue and conveys meaning skillfully. A typical paper in this category
• presents an insightful position on the issue
• develops the position with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
• sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
• expresses ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions (i.e., grammar, usage, and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor errors
_______________________________
Score 5
A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed analysis of the complexities of the issue and conveys meaning clearly. A typical paper in this category
• presents a well-considered position on the issue
• develops the position with logically sound reasons and/or well-chosen examples
• is focused and generally well organized, connecting ideas appropriately
• expresses ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor errors
________________________________
Score 4
A 4 paper presents a competent analysis of the issue and conveys meaning adequately. A typical paper in this category
• presents a clear position on the issue
• develops the position on the issue with relevant reasons and/or examples
• is adequately focused and organized
• expresses ideas with reasonable clarity
• generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English but may have some errors
___________________________________
Score 3
A 3 paper demonstrates some competence in its analysis of the issue and in conveying meaning but is obviously flawed. A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
• is vague or limited in presenting or developing a position on the issue
• is weak in the use of relevant reasons or examples
• is poorly focused and/or poorly organized
• has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity
• contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning
______________________________
Score 2
A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing. A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
• is unclear or seriously limited in presenting or developing a position on the issue
• provides few, if any, relevant reasons or examples
• is unfocused and/or disorganized
• has serious problems in the use of language and sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
• contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning
_______________________________________
Score 1
A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing skills. A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to understand and analyze the issue
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to develop an organized response
• has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
• contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that result in incoherence
_______________________________________
Score 0
Off topic, in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists of only keystroke characters, or is illegible, blank, or nonverbal
_______________________________________
NS
Blank

Argument
____________________________
Score 6
A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique of the argument andconveys meaning skillfully.
A typical paper in this category
• clearly identifies important features of the argument andanalyzes them insightfully
• develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, andconnects them with clear transitions
• effectively supports the main points of the critique
• demonstrates control of language, including appropriateword choice and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions (i.e., grammar,usage, and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor errors
_______________________________________
Score 5
A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed critique of theargument and conveys meaning clearly.
A typical paper in this category
• clearly identifies important features of the argument andanalyzes them in a generally perceptive way
• develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically, andconnects them with appropriate transitions
• sensibly supports the main points of the critique
• demonstrates control of language, including appropriateword choice and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions of standardwritten English but may have minor errors
___________________________________
Score 4
A 4 paper presents a competent critique of the argument and conveysmeaning adequately.
A typical paper in this category
• identifies and analyzes important features of the argument
• develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily but may notconnect them with transitions
• supports the main points of the critique
• demonstrates sufficient control of language to expressideas with reasonable clarity
• generally demonstrates control of the conventions ofstandard written English but may have some errors
___________________________________
Score 3
A 3 paper demonstrates some competence in its critique of the argument andin conveying meaning but is obviously flawed.
A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the followingcharacteristics:
• does not identify or analyze most of the important featuresof the argument, although some analysis of the argument is present
• mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, orreasons poorly
• is limited in the logical development and organization ofideas
• offers support of little relevance and value for pointsof the critique
• lacks clarity in expressing ideas
• contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errorsin grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning
_______________________________________
Score 2
A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing.
A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the followingcharacteristics:
• does not present a critique based on logical analysis,but may instead present the writer's own views on the subject
• does not develop ideas, or is disorganized and illogical
• provides little, if any, relevant or reasonable support
• has serious problems in the use of language and in sentencestructure that frequently interfere with meaning
• contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanicsthat frequently obscure meaning
___________________________________
Score 1
A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in both analysis ANDwriting .
A typical paper in this category exhibits MORE THAN ONE of the followingcharacteristics:
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to understandand analyze the argument
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to developan organized response
• has severe problems in language and sentence structurethat persistently interfere with meaning
• contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanicsthat result in incoherence
_______________________________________
Score 0
Off topic, in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists ofonly keystroke characters, or is illegible, blank, or nonverbal.
_______________________________________
NS
Blank

使用道具举报