{Daily writing 作文特训小组} zhangbao0607的作文专栏，请各位修改指正！

zhangbao0607UID??2943226

2011-7-28 独立写作作文贴
  时间：40分钟    字数：392

题目：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All high school students should take basic economic courses.



High school, an preparing period for the university, is necessary to take various kinds of courses, like the music course, physic course, geography course and so on. However, whether the students in high school should take the economic courses as the basic courses will become an issue. In terms of the development of the students, I agree that the students are supposed to take economic courses as basic courses in high school. That will benefit the students a lot in future.

At the first place, economic courses can help high school students prepare for the study in the university. As for the students who will take economic as their major in university, the basic economic courses can help them to build a foundation for economic. Some concept like the interest rate and exchange rate might be so strange to the one who never get to know the economic. We cannot deny that the students who have had the basic economic knowledge will feel much easier to handle the learning in university. Someone might feel confuse about the question that why students who will not take economic as their major also should take the basic economic courses in high school. The answer is obvious. No matter what you learn, you cannot escape from the economic knowledge, like the students who take food science as their major should also know how to figure out the money they will get after many years from the bank.

What's more, economic courses can also help the students build more friendship with others. When you talk with others, you will find that the ones who knowledgable can attract more person to talk with them. The economic topic become an essencial part in our daily life. By reading the newspaper, you can see how hot is the economic topic in the world. If the person want to become the one who knowledgable, you cannot learn without economic especially to the high school students who will become the powerful energy for the society.

The high school courses should set by the standard which represent the truth need not only for the students in the university but also for the whole society. Basic economic courses play an important role in the preparing for the university life . At the same time, they match the social need for the people to communicate.

糖果cathyUID??3054739

改好了哈 ~

byebyehakuUID??3124349

作文我下了~改完了发上来哈~~今天忘记上寄托了

这是我的作文，欢迎批改~
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1292096-9-2.html

zhangbao0607UID??2943226

10月4日独立！

zhangbao0607UID??2943226

10月4日独立

kinging2021UID??3000586

改好了！

zhangbao0607UID??2943226

9月20日独立

窝头拌咸菜UID??3033645

37# zhangbao0607
9.14改好了~

zhangbao0607UID??2943226

9月14日独立~~~

venusbloomUID??2511701

32# zhangbao0607

pj1213UID??2952708

Education,arguably, plays a pivotal role in the world. People learn to read and writethrough education. There is no doubt that improving the quality of education isalways a predominated topic in education. Although teachers are the key toeducation, I cannot agree that increasing teachers' salaries is the best way toimprove the quality of education.




Firstly,increasing teachers' salaries may result in the decreasing of other
fundings （funds）on education. The sum of the fundings (funds)which use to support the education is limit(limited).When (If) the sumis constant, government should coordinate the expense in order to keep thetotally expense in a reasonable range. As in my university, I cannot imaginethe scene that there are just a few fundings(funds)for educational facilities. In that case, the teachers who enjoy the highsalaries will feel difficult to achieve their educational goals withoutstate-of-the-art equipments.


Secondly,increasing teachers' salaries may lead huge load to some poor families due tomore expensive fee. In order to guarantee enough expense on education, schoolsmay increase the fee of education. Generally speaking, a rich family do (does) not care about the increasing fee. However,in terms of a poor family, that will determine whether the children can go toschool or not.




Admittedly, increasingteachers' salaries can stimulate teachers' motivation in education to someextend. However, increasing teachers' salaries will make some teachers becomemore profitable. In this case, the original purpose of education will beruined. What's more, teachers may become more lazy (lazier)becausethe high salaries can support their lives easily. They can get the paymenteasily than before. That sometimes let education become an industry which focuses more on money than education itself.


To sum up, increasingteachers' salaries is not the best way to improve quality of education. In somecases, that(this kind of method) has moredisadvantages than advantages. Governments and schools should take seriouslyconsideration before they make the decision to increase teachers' salaries.


论点不错哦，我要向你学习～ 小语法问题要克服掉

永动鸡UID??3006486

RE

DrizzlyWongUID??2963546

已改

zhangbao0607UID??2943226

9月6日 独立+综合

zhangbao0607UID??2943226

9月6日 独立+综合