- 最后登录
- 2018-6-9
- 在线时间
- 383 小时
- 寄托币
- 1688
- 声望
- 3
- 注册时间
- 2007-7-4
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 12
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 1669
- UID
- 2358398
- 声望
- 3
- 寄托币
- 1688
- 注册时间
- 2007-7-4
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 12
|
TOPIC: ISSUE83 - "Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
WORDS: 643 TIME: 0:45:00 DATE: 2007-8-10
It is undeniable that government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state due to that the environment is put into a more and more dangerous condition. However, this is the responsibility of all government from the moral respect. For countries who have not lift their people from starvation or who are suffering from many serious problems such as wide spread of AIDS, the domestic issues should come primarily.
It is the responsibility of every government to protect the wildness area in their natural so that the earth can keep its balance. This is of special importance in today's world, with the situation of global environment becoming more and more dangerous(环境不可能dangerous,应该是endangered). The loss of rainforest and many other plants have led to more CO2 existing on the earth, thus causing the global warming, with the ice in the Arctic melting as a result. More species of animals have become extinction due to the change of natural environment made by human beings. Moreover, the human desire has expanded to many wildness areas where few people can reach. Nowadays, many elephants in the African plane have been killed by human beings for their ivory. Both the protection of natural state and animals and plants(2个and不好连用吧) call for the government from every to carry out regulations to preserve the wildness areas.
However, such responsibility is of the moral priority. In fact, for countries that have to deal with a handful of domestic issues cannot and will not spend time on the protection of wildness area. We should keep in mind that the most important responsibility of a government in a country is to promote the development of its country and better the life quality of its people. Nothing would come before this duty. And as we all know, the resources of a government is limited. When there is a conflict between the moral responsibility and the need of its own people, the benefits of its people should come first. How can a country in which its people are still in the condition of starvation to spend a coin on the protection of the wildness area? What the government is to try their best and make use of all available resources to supple food for its people? (这句没看懂....what...is to??)Thus, the government should protect the public wildness areas, with the satisfaction of its domestic need as a priority.
Furthermore, to a certain extreme, the wildness areas should be exploited if the current lands cannot meet the large population in the future. We should make sure the purpose why we protect the environment and the wildness areas. Because we want to keep the earth a habitable place. We want to keep the existence of human beings. The main purpose is to live. However, if, in the future, we need more areas to keep surviving, otherwise we ourselves will become extinct, and then it is understandable to make use of the wildness areas. After all, we cannot sacrifice ourselves to protect the environment. We maybe develop more technology to clone the extinct animals and can also mimic a habitable environment one day in the future. But if we are becoming extinct ourselves, what the environment is used for? At that time, we and the wildness areas are faced with the selection of the nature. The human beings' being(两个being有点重复,前面可以用mankind) able to survival on the base of the sacrifice the environment can also conform to the natural principle that the species of less superiority will eventually abandoned by the nature.(你是想说自然法则最后会导致弱势的一方会被淘汰?那么现在其它所有动物都是弱势,是不是它们都要被淘汰?你是想说如果没有人,环境有什么用,但是没有了动植物,人活着又有什么意思?)
In sum, to preserve the publicly owned wildness areas in their natural state is only the primary responsibility of the government from the moral respect. Only after the solution of the domestic issues at hand can they devote resources to the public problems. However, when it comes to make a choice between human survival and other events, our survivals always comes first.
比较新奇的观点,但是感觉这么不好写,一个重要的问题就是,你没有对题目后面一半作出回应"even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."你只回应了前半句,政府应不应该保护环境, 你觉得呢, 个人看法,语言比较流畅,但是都是长句子,应该稍微主要一下长短搭配.
http://bbs.gter.ce.cn/bbs/thread-718976-1-1.html,也帮我拍拍吧,谢谢了
|
|