【Yornan的作文贴~~】

parrotkingUID: 3323277

issue文章明天再看看吧~~今天先看了你的提纲

panmingming2008UID: 2535351

55 In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.


Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

When it comes to the issue whether it is essential that arts, such as films, novels and poems, should be understandable to majority people to prove its insight merit, the aggressive voice to support the issue is gathering force. However, from my perspective, considering the current society that people inclined to echo the view of others, I firmly uphold the assertion that there is no indispensable relationship between arts merit and public cognition. 题目本身说的是什么？只有认真分析原题，你的立论与理据才能与原题有关联。否则你的整个文章读者很难读明白。另外，有些用词空洞，不细致准确，我看完后还不是太清楚。希望能往简洁、清楚的方向改一下。（并且考虑题目要求“consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true ”

Nowadays, there are a myriad of awards held by organizations in every field, for example, Oscar Award or the Nobel Prize, and these grand events can always attract public attentions to cause universal influences. In these cases, movies, writers and singers invariably receive extolments and fame only if they are rewarded with the prize. It proves that those works contain insight merit complimented by experts in art, but they cannot always be commended and recognized by the public in a more secular way. In addition, in terms of the pressure modern people take, common individuals prefer to accept more casual contents of entertainment, regardless of its art merit.

On the other hand, because of the rapid step in modern people daily life, decreasing people intend to spend time enjoying art works. And it also generates an curiosity phenomena that general people regard the popular as the arts, for they just take the superficial elements of the arts into account and ignore their hollow inside. For instance, we all know that Van Gogh is one of the most eminent artist, and we can also identify his famous painting the Sunflower. It is not hard to speculate that the owner of this painting maybe a art enthusiast and collector, but there is also probability that it belongs to a normal person who purchased it just because its fame.

In a nutshell, considering the fact whether general people can recognize it or not, the real value of arts will not be erased in any case and the majority of the public always cannot distinguish arts from the popular, we should not relate the art merit to public understanding.  

liliudodoUID: 3261082

都是个人意见，楼主请海涵，欢迎指正