- 最后登录
- 2007-12-30
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 627
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-15
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 531
- UID
- 2117374
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 627
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-15
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
------题目------
Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people.
------正文------
Nowadays, the question that whether government is supposed to preserve publicly owned wilderness areas forces a fierce debate over it. As far as I am 去掉?concern, I allege that it is the duty of the government to preserve wilderness areas, no matter how remote they locate. To support my point of view, I would like to analyze its importance from two aspects as follows.
On one hand, preservation is served to keep the original look of those wildness areas, including the specific kinds of animals and plants, and different kinds of climate, as well as the particular landscape. If only we spare no efforts to resist? preserve its appearance it is used to be, not can we get to understand more about the interior world of such areas. Furthermore, some wilderness areas, for not intervened by humans very much, follow the rules built up solely by the nature itself which can date from ages ago. As for now, it carries its indispensable value to the study of nature. It is obvious that the wildness areas can be called the homeland for all the animals as well as the plants living in there, where their ancestors settle. In addition, study of the entire amazing creatures there can lead our human to a higher level of recognizing ourselves and the comprehension of the past of the world we live in now这段不错!
On another one the other, the preservation the government provides should avoid the human's intemperate behavior which may set great influence to the wildness areas. For no one can tell whether it will benefit the natural conditions there or not, we cannot stride such a big step to do whatever we think may be right to those areas without predication of the unforeseeable result感觉这句好象自相矛盾,既然认为是对的,怎么会没有事先想过呢?就直接说不经分析就采取保护措施吧. It is highly possible that once any imprudent measures taken to reconstruct the natural areas, the whole ecotype system, which is formed by the vicissitude of nature, can would be ruined leaving only calamity.这里举个反面例子来说吧 America, for instance, to keep such tragedy from happening, settle the acts about the protection of wildness areas restricting that people can only go sight-seeing, hiking, and scientific research there, which does great help to those areas maintaining its specific quality.这个例子有点没说清楚,用这些措施怎么就保护了呢?
Even if some wildness areas locate on the remote edge of the state, they are the treasures the human-beings all over the world share. Definitely, government should take its accountability on shoulder to preservation and there is no way for us to abandon the rich resource and great value of those areas. However, what is worse, once some contemptible people find out any profit they may acquire from the natural treasure, the distance cannot be obstacle set on their road to gain the profit. New Zealand, taking as example, already constitutes related acts about it to restrain any human activities which may result in possible damages to the environment in the wildness areas. It is government that should take charge of it and be responsible to supervise.例子说具体点,会更有说服力
From what has been discussed above, we can explicitly assert that government cannot escape its responsibility towards the preservation of the wildness areas, which is fulfilled with the precise gifts God offers. AdmittedlyMeanwhile, every human being also should do his or her best to support government to make the world a more harmonious one.
文章结构很好,语言也不错,这么短时间写出来的,佩服!:p |
|