issue48 创造历史之伟人Vs.凡人 精干文章+超详细讨论

gra cie0213UID：157500

呵呵，拜读一下，先占个座

gra cie0213UID：157500

Though the historical study is focused on the celebrities, controversy on who realize the events and trends is still going on. For my part, we should bear in mind that the determinant of history is the forgotten masses rather than the dominant figures,dominant figures和famous people是不是有些不同? but it is feasible to study only the celebrities rather than the masses.

History actually resided in the hands of the forgotten masses. Take delve into the World War II, what comes to our mind first is the celebrities as Roosevelt and the fellow generals who commanded the battle. However, just as a Chinese saying goes, the fame of the general is based on the casualty of the soldiers一将功成万骨枯的英文版？. What truly defeated the Japanese and Nazi Germany is the hundreds of aircraft carriers and tens of thousands of tanks manufactured by the workers and the death toll of the soldiers that mounted an even greater number. Without their blood and sweat, the generals alone could by no means fight against the foe. So, the war was indeed won by the toil of the workers who survived and the sacrifice of soldiers who died.

On the other hand, the function of the celebrity which should not be trivialized availed to the acceleration of the events. Looking into the One Hundred Years War, we observe that although the majority of French were only to to是不是要删了willing to drive away the British intruders and reoccupy their homeland, but they were hesitant and the wrath was not released until the 17 year old girl Joan of Arc stood out and mustered the people to fight for their own country. Though the French is destined to claim their own land, were it not for Joan of Arc, the victory would be postponed markedly. 这句语法有问题哦，这应该是和过去事实相反的虚拟条件句吧？

But, 这段的转折是对B1&B2的转折,但是上文刚好说的是名人的作用,和这段本质上没有冲突,所以感觉还是有点突兀,如果B1,B2总结之后再转折似乎更好? the pitiful truth is that the historical research is focused merely on several celebrity rather than the masses. It is somewhat reasonable but not justifiable. We already know that the determinant of history is the masses, but due to the great number of the ordinary people, it is impossible to identify, record and examine what every one of them thought and did, while the celebrities’ deeds are easy to observe. So, practically, historians always study only the contribution of the famous people which may to some extent representative the trend and masses.

We shall all remember that the determinant of history is the forgotten masses and their unknown contribution but we can literally observe only the celebrities readily.

嘿,不好意思,拖了一天才帖上来.
对比了一下,发现原稿和修改稿差不多,我就在你的修改版改了
总体来说写得不错,结构很清晰,文字也很简洁,