issue43 G-89-互助社-22日 （已用WORD修改红绿线，高频，请各位高手拍砖、交流）

fantasianosUID：207837

作文：(574)
Bill Clinton, though condemned for his sexual affairs, is regarded as a great leader; Adolf Hitler, who was said to take candies out from his pocket and give them to little children, are always notorious for his behavior in the World War Two. Generally, many public officials suffer from all sorts of immoral and unethical actions and the answer to whether each of them is decent has been controversy for a prolonged period. Some people suggest that a leader should stick to the highest ethical and moral standards, while some others, apart from those left saying nothing, declare the opposite. Actually, to maintain too high a level of ethic and moral is neither necessary nor sensible for a public official.

To prevent the problem from ambiguity, what must be ascertained first and foremost is to realize the "selves" of a public official. Substantially, the character of a leader can and should be divided into two parts, one the "public self", the other the "private self"; and the one going to be discussed in this essay is the "public self".

As a leader, the person's responsibility is to harmonize the relations not only within the nation, district, county or other kind of groups presided, but also between her or his own colony and its counterparts. This duty imposes tasks divergent from those of ordinary people. To fulfill corresponding tasks, the leader may have to do something seemingly unacceptable from the perspective of normal ethic and moral as well, let alone the highest standards.

It is almost always true that the political purposes necessitate sacrifices in ethic and moral for the sake of the whole group. For example, a lot of people have to die from wars to defend their country, while policemen have the danger of dying for their society's security, and firefighters set their own life in danger on behalf of other's lives. All these examples, though not directly coming from politicians, are the result of the leaders’ governance. Besides, in the history of ancient China, there was an empire who married his own sister to protect his power from otherwise robbery by another wife, which sounded extremely against ethical criteria.

Nevertheless, without ethic and moral at all, never can a public leader attain the final desired goals, since the person would lose reputation and reliability as well as a series of other reverences needed. An example in point is Nixon, the first forced-down president in American history. Although he had done perfect jobs during his first tenure and continued to be elected for another tenure, the Watergate affair dragged him from his chair. Dishonesty was what he committed. Once had he told a lie, he had to tell much more lies to deceive the public; and finally, when all things were revealed, his political life expired.

As a conclusion, on the contrary to a prevailing opinion that a politic official has the responsibility to follow the highest ethical and moral standards, what the official should do is to regulate politics with ethic and moral. Realistically, what causes dilemmas is the conflicts between the term "politics" as well as "ethic and moral", to deal with which calls for both politicalization--the process of regulating moral according to politics goal and principles--and moralization and “ethicalizaion”--the process of  adjusting politics in accordance with moral and ethical. Only when these were done, could a leader build, maintain and expand the group's interest and prosperity.

ryanqUID：154025

帮你把题目贴出来:)
43"To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards."

ryanqUID：154025

Bill Clinton, though condemned for his sexual affairs, is regarded as a great leader; Adolf Hitler, who was said to take candies out from his pocket and give them to little children, are always notorious for his behavior in the World War Two. Generally, many public officials suffer from all sorts of immoral and unethical actions and the answer to whether each of them is decent has been controversy for a prolonged period. Some people suggest that a leader should stick to the highest ethical and moral standards, while some others, apart from those left saying nothing, declare the opposite. Actually, to maintain too high a level of ethic and moral is neither necessary nor sensible for a public official.

To prevent the problem from ambiguity, what must be ascertained first and foremost is to realize the "selves" of a public official. Substantially, the character of a leader can and should be divided into two parts, one the "public self", the other the "private self"; and the one going to be discussed in this essay is the "public self".为什么选择public self ?最好说以下原因

As a leader, the person's responsibility is to harmonize the relations not only within the nation, district, county or other kind of groups presided, but also between her or his own colony and its counterparts. This duty imposes tasks divergent from those of ordinary people. To fulfill corresponding tasks, the leader may have to do something seemingly unacceptable from the perspective of normal ethic and moral as well, let alone the highest standards.

It is almost always true that the political purposes necessitate sacrifices in ethic and moral for the sake of the whole group. For example, a lot of people have to die from wars to defend their country, while(前后不是转折关系) policemen have the danger of dying for their society's security, and firefighters set their own life in danger on behalf of other's lives. All these examples, though not directly coming from politicians, are the result of the leaders’ governance. Besides, in the history of ancient China, there was an empire who married his own sister to protect his power from otherwise robbery by another wife, which sounded extremely against ethical criteria.

Nevertheless, without ethic and moral at all, never can a public leader attain the final desired goals, since the person would lose reputation and reliability as well as a series of other reverences needed. An example in point is Nixon, the first forced-down president in American history. Although he had done perfect jobs during his first tenure and continued to be elected for another tenure, the Watergate affair dragged him from his chair. Dishonesty was what he committed. Once had he told a lie, he had to tell much more lies to deceive the public; and finally, when all things were revealed, his political life expired.

As a conclusion, on the contrary to a prevailing opinion that a politic official has the responsibility to follow the highest ethical and moral standards, what the official should do is to regulate politics with ethic and moral. Realistically, what causes dilemmas is the conflicts between the term "politics" as well as "ethic and moral", to deal with which calls for both politicalization--the process of regulating moral according to politics goal and principles--and moralization and “ethicalizaion”--the process of  adjusting politics in accordance with moral and ethical. Only when these were done, could a leader build, maintain and expand the group's interest and prosperity.

论证的比较浅，希望能抓住一点说清楚，比如论证的B1最好把你要从Public的角度分析的原因写出来。另外B2没有例子，略显单薄，可以考虑把它和B3并在一起，作为一个方面的两个角度来写。
B4可以再充实一些。你一直在说现象，领导人没有ethical就会没有reputation，然后举了Nixon的例子，我觉得这里的原因是nixon丧失的ethic是诚实，有些道德是做人起码的要求，如果没有这些了，自然会失去人心。多加一些分析。
其实你写的很不错了，开头挺新颖，限时写成这样话，可以上4分了。希望多多努力,加油:)

fantasianosUID：207837

thank you very much!
Though the mark is not as high as that expected, I do have an impression about my writing skill now...

fantasianosUID：207837

之后一不留神把文章修改成了727个字，到时候万一碰到也不知道是好事还是坏事

fishwater00UID：182063

加油o