isuue处女作，大家狂拍~~~

analyze061109UID: 2692797

以下所贴的文章是我的issue的首作 ，我是在对GRE单词不熟、没有读过北美范文、

没有系统的背过好词好句、没有上过新东方之类的辅导班等一系列的没有的基础上 （看过ETS的6篇范文），

以老牛拉破车式的速度 ，完成了这篇开头写得让人很费解的文章，本想改改，

但觉得还是以一次成型的水平见大家的好，虽然在写作时间上没有要求，但是没有做修改才更能接近自己的真是水平，

所以这篇issue 绝对的 unrevised and original

贴出这篇isuue的目的有二

1 各位前辈们都是过来人（当然共同进步的同志们也多提意见），恳请大家能对我的文章提出实质性的意见，

多多做点评，绝对欢迎各界的“狂轰乱炸”，你们就尽情的扔砖吧！我得在暴风雨中寻求进步，你们的转头是

筑起我成功之路的重要因素！

2 请大家帮我预测一下，依照我这第一篇的水平（当然没有时间限制的写作，水平定是低于现在所变现出来的），

经过仨月的努力，能否达到4到5分的水准（当然是以考试的标准来讲），要达到这个目的，在这段时间我还

应该做如何的准备和努力，重点在哪里！

我这些请求是不是太罗嗦了，总而言之，言而总之，就是希望大家多多提意见，废话不多说了，下边就贴出自己的

isuue，在这里献丑了，请大家直言啊~~~~~






Issue 73


In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge.



＂What came first on the earth , the chicken or the egg ?＂Note that it is not only seems a simple and funny issue but also have a relationship between philosophy. This nexus what I am claiming here existing between in imagination and knowledge too.

Albert Einstein once said that to put forward a question is far more important than to solve a problem on account of that there may be just a simple accumulation about mathematics, experiment and others knowledge for solving problem, but that put forward new issues, novel possibilities and from another standpoint to look at an old problem which to demand creative imagination. However, this creative imagination which I claiming above is the really symbol about progress in science.


In 1992, a professor who owned Nobel Prize for medicine came from University of Washington whose name is Edmond Fischer. When he came back to Shanghai where is his birthplace and stood on the podium in the University of Tongji, his passionate speech had an effect on all people’s emotion. He presented his scientific ideas and prospects for Chinese students. ＂leave some time for imagination＂ which is Fischer’s advices for Chinese students. He believed that the nature of science same as art which need intuition and imagination. There is no time to relax and imagine if squeezed too much information to the brain.

One reason many today do not subscribe to the notion of imagination is more important than knowledge is the imagination can not transmute reality until based on relative knowledge. I have also taken into account this aspect and affirmed. Even though imagination put superior status to knowledge by Einstein, but there is not the slightest idea to belittle knowledge. To put it plainly, imagination is more broader on coverage, more stronger on influence, more prominent on effect and more returns than knowledge. Granted, the importance of knowledge we should not ignore, because of imagination is the source of a goal which is determined but that knowledge as a tool to complete the goal. We know science and technology are the primary productivity, however, in this information society which is highly competitive world, this kind of notion perhaps have been behind.

In most professions and academic fields, we do not need too much
imagination when we are in a state of pursued. Because we know what we ought to do. We have only one belief that catch up with those who running in front of us. But when we become bellwether we must lose ours way if there is inability to imagine for future, it is like steamship which lose compass, ultimately watch as others catch up with you again.

In industrial period, people still believe that technological knowledge is more important than imagination. May be when we play a role about a laggard, that breakthrough could praised which is on science and technology. Whereas, we can not play a parasite as well as we have being enter a information society which is need infinite imagination. Compare with America’s internet, China is a loser in that competition about Web 2.0. I think the primary reason due to we lack of the fancy, internet is a virtual world which is different from the real material world, it same as academic felids which is a free world and is not dominated by anything, this is the place where the human free play imagination.

We may complacent when we believe that our logic and computational capabilities are strong, we should reflect on how about our imagination. Perhaps, this is the crucial problem why we are unable to obtain the Nobel Prize.

The universe is high-point rather than sky; the imagination is high-point rather than knowledge.

analyze061109UID: 2692797

好赖给俺拍两砖啊~~~~~~

jjs1986UID: 2478040

肯定有3分了。

zyfo2UID: 2692865

有点不够严谨，建议每段开头亮观点