寄托天下
查看: 882|回复: 1

[活动] 10.28作业 by melody [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
2
寄托币
813
注册时间
2008-10-16
精华
0
帖子
4
发表于 2009-10-28 18:17:17 |显示全部楼层
10.28 The only effective way to encourage energy conservation is by increasing prices of gasoline and electricity. Do you agree or disagree?

During the latest hundred years, the civilization of human is flourishing at an unparalleled speed, while our planet is unfortunately suffering more and more problems, such as animal extinction, air pollution and source scarce. Some people hold that we should only rely on the marketing to reduce the waste of the precious source. However, I argue that increasing the consumption cost of gasoline and electricity is not the only way to the goal of conservation.

First, we could set regulations and even laws on source protection. Although people are inclined to consider the price of the commodity when they deside whether to purchase something and the amount they need in our economized society, marketing sometimes could lose its effect. Take China for instance, a certain period time during sewenties last century, the prices of a large number of goods tent to rise so quickly and thousands of Chinese people held that the prices would continue to soar. Instead of stopping buying those expensive things, people's fearness drove them to purchase more than they really need. Therefore, the same situation maybe recurs if we just increase the prices of gasoline and electricity without any regulations and laws to regulate people's behavior.

And also, governments could take some vivid but effective measures to avoid the waste of gasoline and electricity. Publisizing the significance of source and the urgent demand for protection would be an excellent one. In fact, many celebrities have already taken the responsibility to publisize the importance of environment protection. A great many of authors and paintists also created numerous art production to wake up people's realization of taking care our pathetic planet and ourselves. Through this way, more and more people would like to take part in the action to conserve our sources. Definitely, this measure could be easier for people to accept as people love to do those things out of their hearts rather than be pushing by high cost they need to cover.

In conclusion, via increasing prices to regulate people's choices is just one method while more other measures need our attention to pay on. After all, the marketing is not going to work at any time and our sources could get better protection if people would love to take the duty.
彼岸有花,静心宅。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
1
寄托币
120
注册时间
2009-4-23
精华
0
帖子
4
发表于 2009-10-29 22:52:10 |显示全部楼层
During the latest hundred years, the civilization of human is flourishing at an unparalleled speed, while our planet is unfortunately suffering more and more problems, such as animal extinction, air pollution and source scarce. Some people hold that we should only rely on the marketing to reduce the waste of the precious source. However, I argue that increasing the consumption cost of gasoline and electricity is not the only way to the goal of conservation. (开头写的非常好!)

First, we could set regulations and even laws on source protection. Although people are inclined to consider the price of the commodity when they deside(decide) whether to purchase something and the amount they need in our economized society, marketing sometimes could lose its effect. Take China for instance, a certain period time during sewenties last century, the prices of a large number of goods tent(tended) to rise so quickly and thousands of Chinese people held that the prices would continue to soar. Instead of stopping buying those expensive things, people's fearness (worry) drove them to purchase more than they really need. Therefore, the same situation maybe recurs if we just increase the prices of gasoline and electricity without any regulations and laws to regulate people's behavior.

And also, governments could take some vivid but effective measures to avoid the waste of gasoline and electricity. Publisizing(promoting) the significance of source and the urgent demand for protection would be an excellent one. In fact, many celebrities have already taken the responsibility to publisize(advocate) the importance of environment protection. A great many of authors and paintists also created numerous art production(products) to wake up (spark) people's realization of taking care our pathetic planet and ourselves. Through this way, more and more people would like to take part in the action to conserve our sources. Definitely, this measure could be easier for people to accept as people love to do those things out of their hearts rather than be pushing by high cost they need to cover.

In conclusion, via increasing prices to regulate people's choices is just one method while more other measures need our attention to pay on. After all, the marketing is not going to work at any time and our sources could get better protection if people would love to take the duty.

文章整理来说写的非常好,论点和论据都很好,句型多变,只有个别小错误

使用道具 举报

RE: 10.28作业 by melody [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
10.28作业 by melody
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1022690-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部