- 最后登录
- 2013-5-10
- 在线时间
- 206 小时
- 寄托币
- 66
- 声望
- 16
- 注册时间
- 2009-9-13
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 5
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 583
- UID
- 2697832
 
- 声望
- 16
- 寄托币
- 66
- 注册时间
- 2009-9-13
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 5
|
本帖最后由 gongyuxiang1990 于 2009-11-3 18:10 编辑
Issue7:
"The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation that written records."
提纲:
观点:
Video camera 和 written各有优缺,都有其特定的使用价值,不具有可比性。
论证:
1.定义关键词Record
2.Video比书写好的地方是记录客观真实,不受作者主观影响+举例。
3.Video比书写好在它能提供真实的场景,比如拍摄风景。
4.书面记录也有其优势的地方,比如成本底方便。
5.书面记录适用于正式场合,比如一些法令,合同签署。
6.总结,我们应该恰当地应用它们,强调观点都有价值。
Nowadays, video cameras are widely used in our life and become more and more popular, for they provide accurate and convincing records. It seems that without video cameras our records are something boring and inaccurately, and they have become more important than written recordings. However, each of them has advantages and disadvantages in particular areas, and they both have significant effects on document. So we cannot judge which one is more important.
Record is something that can be referred to later, it should be accurately and prolonged storage. Some records need real and objective scene, such as real-time live matches broadcast and some require the authors' commentaries such as archeology. Therefore, video cameras and hand writing both have utility value.
Video camera provides objective records, they are not influenced by the author. In contrast, written records maybe a subjective, because they accord to the writer's thought. For instance, we want to record a demonstrate course in order for other students to study. A radio camera should be more vivid and overall, other students can watch the video record and receive the same information as us who have attended the course. But, if we use written record, of course they are our notes, other students can only learn from what we had written. We cannot write down all the information provided by the teacher, we usually record what we thought important or maybe what we didn't understand.
Video camera can provide the real scenes. For example, the beautiful scenery are better to be taken by a video camera rather than written.
When we watch the digital records, we can see the scenery as if we were there, someone liken video cameras to the artificial eyes. But readers of the written records can only see the beauty through out their imagination.
Writing as a method of recording is more convenient and cheaper than video cameras, for we only need a pan and a notebook to write, that's cost only a few dollars and an educated person can use it easily. But only a well treated person can take well qualified records by a video camera, and a video need electricity support and influence by the environment conditions such as light, heat and so on, more importantly, a video camera is not that cheap.
And if we want to use the records made by cameras, special facilities are needed, such as computers, video.
However, we use written records just found them out and read them.
Written records are widely used in some formal documents, such as a discipline, an order or a contract. Let's take the contract as an example. During a negotiation the two sides have
made a decision and they should sign their name on a contract, written records maybe better for this. If we use video camera, take down the process of the meeting and then maybe a representative make a conclusion speech. It seems that this form of deals is not protected by the law.
In sum, we should choose to use video camera records or written records in suitable conditions. They are the same important in today's information society.
|
|