T11

6886liminUID: 2542415

in my mind, saving land for endangered animals is more important than satisfying human nedds for farmland, housing and industry.
first of all, we donot want oursprings living in a world with limited living beings. if we fight with those endangered animals for land, there is no doubt about that we will win. However, the horrible consequence will follow that is the endangered will extinct and our children will not see these livings in the real world but from the pictures and vedios. donot you think it is sad?
second, we can conquer these chanlleges from land constrains by other ways such as high-rise buildings rather than occupying these extinctions' habitat. in my city, the goverment had restured some old unavailable buildings and taken good use of those vacant fields. which definiately is an effective way to solve the question of land contrains.
third, from the views of ourselves, we can learn a lot and benefit a lot from animals. for instances, our flights have been pilotting by radar that we producted right after we know how the bats are flying at night. we have extracted lots of materials from them to make drugs and other things. we have no idea about how great things we will gain from the extinctions.
finally, image what the world looks like without large numbers of wild animals. every kind of living beings plays an important role in keeping ecological balance. if there is no sparrows, the injourious insects such as locusts will eat all of the plants of wheat ,rice and so on. the question of famine will still exist. without animals, there is no way to keep the plants living. following the logic, we will die too for lacking fresh air
all in all, we should take the program of proctecting the extinctions serious not only saving land for them. we should enlarge the protect plan, which should conclude serve them clain air, food and water, too .

daboraUID: 2574809

in my mind, saving land for endangered animals is more important than satisfying human nedds need for farmland, housing and industry.
first of all, we donot want oursprings living in a world with limited living beings. if we fight with those endangered animals for land考虑下space是否更合适, there is no doubt about可以不需要 that we will win. However, the horrible consequence will follow that is 有问题，is不需要the endangered will extinct and our children will not see these livings in the real world but from the pictures and vedios单词拼写有问题. donot you think it is sad?
  secondly, we can conquer these chanlleges from land constrains by other ways such as high-rise buildings rather than occupying these extinctions' habitat. in my city, the goverment had restured some old unavailable buildings and taken good use of those vacant fields. which definiately is an effective way to solve the question of land contrains。
thirdly, from the views of ourselves, we can learn a lot and benefit a lot from animals. for instances, our flights have been pilotting by radar that we producted 是produced 么right after we know how the bats are flying at night. we have extracted lots of materials from them to make drugs and other things. we have no idea about how great things we will gain from the extinctions.
finally, image what the world looks like without large numbers of wild animals. every kind of living beings plays an important role in keeping ecological balance. if there is no sparrows, the injourious insects such as locusts will eat all of the plants of wheat ,rice and so on. the question of famine will still exist. without animals, there is no way to keep the plants living. following the logic, we will also die too 不需要for lacking fresh air
  all in all, we should take the program of proctecting the extinctions seriously not only saving land for them. we should enlarge the protect plan, which should conclude serve them clain air, food and water, too .楼主用总结一段不错，赞
楼主的文章总体语法，句型把握的基本上不错，但是注意勿过多修辞，首先要保证你的句子能够说清你的意思，然后考虑修饰。个人比较倾向总分，先亮出观点，然后阐述。给人以清晰的思路，小小建议，仅供参考