- 最后登录
- 2021-2-22
- 在线时间
- 4673 小时
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 声望
- 762
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 907
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 6161
- UID
- 2565872
 
- 声望
- 762
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 907
|
发表于 2010-2-27 02:01:45
|显示全部楼层
Recently, there is an ongoing discussion online, with sharply rising volume, as? (Shouldn't you use something like 'which is about'? If you remove the part about 'with...volumn', and read the whole sentence again, does 'there is an discussion online as 'xxx'' sound natural?) " is it right or wrong that teachers show their political or social views known in class" (Again, I doubt the validity of this question in the first place. The language in the question is not even correct. It should be either '..show their..views' or '...make their...views known in class'.). In my point of view, the basic responsibility of a teacher is to modulate his/her students' personalities and make them acquire knowledge (This actually means 'force them to acquire knowledge'..I'd suggest something softer such as 'help them acquire knowledge'.). So I totally assert that teachers should not demonstrate their own sense of value ('political or social views' don't necessarily mean 'values'. For example, to say that President Obama's new policies are not efficient is not really expressing much of a 'value', but it's a political 'view'.) to students.
Initially, as a teacher, he/she is bound to give some directions and advices when students are confused. (Who? Both 'as a teacher' and 'he/she' needs a solid noun as their target.) For instance, when a senior student got through the college entrance examination, he/she may hesitate about which major to choose and which university to apply for. Then his/her teacher, whose has a wide range of? knowledge of such education information and who realize (You don't 'realize' a hobby or proficiency. You simply 'know' them, or 'realize' 'what they are'.) the student's hobbies and proficiencies, may contribute a lot, because students usually trust their teachers. While if a teacher has a negative impression on certain majors according to some social reasons, and he considers more about his own feelings than the student's interests when helping his students to choose alter ('alter' means to change.) major. How serious will the consequence will be? (Be cautious. Don't get too used to writing clauses, so much so that you can't write a real question correctly.) The result is that the student may regret to about asking for his teacher's advice and now is thinking about changing main subject (This is not the same as 'major'. Stick to the fixed vocabulary.). What a pity! (You failed to consider the keyword 'in the classroom' in the question, provided the question is as what you've given here. 'in the classroom' is a figurative way to say 'while teaching'. Therefore the question is saying that teachers should not show personal political/social opinions while they're teaching classes. Your example, however, seems to likely happen in a more personal setting, and it might not always be in the 'teaching' context, therefore not entirely relevant.)
From another perspective, each man has the right to pursue his own sense of value ('Value', in the sense of 价值观,is generally not 'pursued', but 'cultivated' or 'acquired'.), whether in the aspect of politics or social studies. Students, unlike adults, seldom formulate their views about matters completely. And they need opportunities to possess a sense of value belonged to of their own. They can finish the process through learning from books and experiences, and/or communicating with others. Even though the whole process of growing is filled with failures and hardness, everyone has to go through it. Sometimes, students are too young to tell the difference between right and wrong, and at the moment they may follow their teachers' and parents' behaviors. Unfortunately, the viewpoints of many teachers are so extreme and have no balance. Therefore, if teachers show their own political or social views to the class, it may adversely affect students' minds and behaviors. Worse still, teachers' totally listeners? may be misled in their life road?. (You need more solid examples, but this is a better argument because it is more relevant to the 'teaching' context I spoke about in the previous paragraph.)
By and large (This means 'in general', so it's not an entirely absolute expression, while 'assert' is a very absolute word. They don't quite go well together.), based on those points mentioned above, I assert that a perfect (Both the question and this essay never mentioned anything about being 'perfect' teachers.) teacher never shows their his/her individual points about politics and sociality to the class. Only in this way, can students lead a healthy development.
总结:
语法和遣词造句的问题不是很大,基本不影响理解,但请注意一下有些不是很准确的使用和一些看起来貌似中式翻译的语汇。。还有就是不要写分句写得太多而在写简单句的时候也用分句语法。。
逻辑上来说就是在第一个分论点提到的,题目里的in the classroom指的是在教学中的意思,所以你的论证也应该随着强调教学中老师怎样。 |
|