ISSUE153 ,写了很久，请拍，必回。

qisaimanUID: 2703629

提纲：
观点：应该掌握真正的怀疑主义，
提纲：
什么是怀疑主义：我的观点。怀疑主义是一种方法论，通过它，我们不但提出疑问和更要解决疑问。
正文
1：好处是：批判性思考的条件；


2：如何使用它剔除知识中的错误；
3：可能的危害：不能针对一切事物使用；比如，公理公设不在怀疑之列。
总结

改了看3楼

NEU公孙轩辕UID: 2697609

没改完，先吃饭撒....

What is skepticism for the students? To accepting what they are taught passively is of course not skepticism, but it is a necessary process to accumulate knowledge. To question what they are taught is not a real skepticism for students, it is only a beginning（of what?如果积累知识是怀疑的开始，貌似有点儿讲不通，知识应该是怀疑的基础撒....怀疑的开始应该是发现是实际与理论不符...). To be truly skeptical, one needs essential knowledge and proper approaches to doubt and inquire. Skepticism is a methodology, in which we not only question but also seek for the answers. Students should master the real skepticism.(作者的观点是什么？我觉得应该在最后一局明确指出，最后这一句话没有一个地方明显体现了作者的观点，我甚至可以理解为这是别人的观点，作者只是拿来复述一边罢了...莫怪...)

Most of us share a belief that one of the significant purposes of education is providing the educated with the ability of critical thinking. And the skepticism is a necessary condition for it.(说的太笼统，condition多得很，到底你的condition指的是什么？，不要让读者去猜你的意思）） Therefore, the educator should teach the students how to become effective skeptics. Being skeptical is a demanding job. As mentioned above, one has to be equipped with certain essential knowledge to support it. Therefore, for the students without necessary knowledge, such as those in primary schools, they should focus on what they are taught more than questioning/quest it. With sufficient knowledge, students should be encouraged to learn how to question and how to answer the questions, actually that is the way we sort out the mistake and fallacy.

Skepticism plays a vital role in verifying the learned(?) and discovering the potential mistakes from the learning. To be skeptical, one should firstly question the claim constructively(一开始就必须怀疑的有建设性？不是吧，有的怀疑开始的时候并不一定就很准确，（谁能开始就保证自己的怀疑就是对滴...)多数都是再进一步的研究过程中不断的修正才最终找到问题）, then seek solid evidences and conduct reasoning to prove or disprove it. A common claim is like the saying that we only use ten percent of our brain. A skeptic will not accept it readily. Instead, he will ask what does the ten percent mean, how to measure it, and is there a limit for the human beings to explore the brain. Then he will search for the source through various ways, probably including the internet, the library and the paper of relevant scientists. In the end, he reaches a temporal conclusion about it until there is new and further evidence which suggests otherwise. Actually, being skeptical is far more than questioning. The most important procedure is searching evidence and conducting reasoning. Only in this way can we obtain new knowledge and kick off the fallacies.

It is noticeable that skepticism can bring disadvantages if used inappropriately. One does not necessarily bring skepticism to everything. Skepticism is necessary in learning new knowledge, particularly in the field of science and technology. But when it comes to other realms, such as religion, it often brings troubles rather than advantages. The skepticism is an approach to the truth, a barrier against manipulation and more importantly, a valuable treasure needing training and continuous effort to obtain. Equipped with the spirit of skepticism, the students can develop a sharpen sight and perception, which is both beneficial in the learning and the later social life.

qisaimanUID: 2703629

What is skepticism for the students? To accepting what they are taught passively is of course not skepticism, but it is a necessary process to accumulate knowledge. To question what they are taught is not a real skepticism for students, it is only a beginning. To be truly skeptical, one needs essential knowledge and proper approaches to doubt and inquire, in other words, to question and manage to answer the questions. Skepticism is a methodology, in which we not only question but also seek for the answers. This is the beneficial skepticism students should master.

As the speaker indicates, there seem only two possible attitudes for the students to take: accepted it passively or question whatever they are taught. However, I will argue that there is another stance: to doubt and more importantly to inquire. For the knowledge will not augment for those who only question not answer, or at least try to answer. The skepticism will be beneficial and effective only when one responds to the questions and this is true to the students.
Therefore, the educator should teach the students how to become effective skeptics. Being skeptical is a demanding job. As mentioned above, one has to be equipped with certain essential knowledge to support it. Therefore, for the students without necessary knowledge, such as those in primary schools, they should focus on what they are taught more than questioning it. With sufficient knowledge, students should be encouraged to learn how to question and how to answer the questions, actually that is the way we sort out the mistake and fallacy.

Most of us share a belief that one of the significant purposes of education is providing the educated with the ability of critical thinking. And I contend the skepticism is a necessary condition for it. Skepticism plays a vital role in verifying the learned knowledge and discovering the potential mistakes from the learning. To be skeptical, one should firstly question the claim constructively, then seek solid evidence and conduct warranted reasoning to prove or disprove it. A frequently heard claim is like the saying that we only use ten percent of our brain. A skeptic will not accept it readily. Instead, he or she will ask what does the ten percent means, how to measure it, and is there a limit for the human beings to explore the brain. Then he will search for the source through various ways, probably including the internet, the library and the paper of relevant scientists. In the end, he reaches a temporal conclusion about it until there is new and further evidence which suggests otherwise. Therefore, being skeptical is far more than questioning. The most important procedure is searching evidence and conducting reasoning. Only in this way can we obtain new knowledge and kick off the fallacies.

Admittedly, it is noticeable that skepticism can bring disadvantages if used inappropriately. One does not necessarily bring skepticism to everything. Skepticism is necessary in learning new knowledge, particularly in the field of science and technology. But when it comes to other realms, such as religion, it often brings troubles rather than advantages. Since the religion, by its nature, calls for one commits to the claims that need no proof and cannot be proved. It is just a wrong way to apply skepticism to the self-evident matter.

Students can benefit from the skepticism with proper method and they should be encouraged to develop it, use it and enrich it. The skepticism is an approach to the truth, a barrier against manipulation and more importantly, a valuable treasure needing continuous effort to obtain. Equipped with the spirit of skepticism, the students can develop a sharpen sight and perception, which are both beneficial in the learning and the later social life.