海盗的作文 专用贴！

让我来做海盗UID: 2762535

TPO7感觉自己 写得很挫， 大家怎么样？ 貌似这个 听力 是不是 比其他的有点难呢？  大家什么感觉啊？

In brief, the speaker in the listening argues that there are a great many reasons for American company to receive the ecocertification for their wood product, eventually, which cast doubt on the auther's point in the passage that the wood company would do the same way like the foreign International Company to adopt this new practice receiving the certification.

First of all, in the listening, the professor maintains that the consumer in American would have much more confident in the advertisement made by independent certification agencies rather than the claim made by their own company. Clearly, the Americans have a great concern on the ecological issue. Thus, they will give a warm welcome to the wood company who has received the ecocertification.
This standpoint disagrees with the testimony demonstrated in the reading that consumers in American do not trust in advertising claims in general.

Besides, according to the lecture, a study shows that price is the priority to care about when its too much high or low for consumers. Actually, after receiving the eccocertification, there will be more 5% higher than its original price. In this place, the companies who get the ecological certification will not make them lost market. This refutes the point in the passage that lower price will make the product more attractive rather than the obtaining ecocertification does.

Furthermore, the professor makes the point that pursuing a eccocertification for the American wood company is to keep ability to compete with the International foreign wood companies. Obiviously, if the American company could not capture the domestic market as quickly as they can, the International wood company would flood into the market by selling the ecological product. While the passage, on the contrary, indicates a conflicting statement that American wood companies would not make sense for attaining a certification because they do need to occupy the global market.

让我来做海盗UID: 2762535

TPO7感觉自己 写得很挫， 大家怎么样？ 貌似这个 听力 是不是 比其他的有点难呢？  大家什么感觉啊？

In brief, the speaker in the listening argues that there are a great many reasons for American company to receive the ecocertification for their wood product, eventually, which cast doubt on the auther's point in the passage that the wood company would do the same way like the foreign International Company to adopt this new practice receiving the certification.

First of all, in the listening, the professor maintains that the consumer in American would have much more confident in the advertisement made by independent certification agencies rather than the claim made by their own company. Clearly, the Americans have a great concern on the ecological issue. Thus, they will give a warm welcome to the wood company who has received the ecocertification.
This standpoint disagrees with the testimony demonstrated in the reading that consumers in American do not trust in advertising claims in general.

Besides, according to the lecture, a study shows that price is the priority to care about when its too much high or low for consumers. Actually, after receiving the eccocertification, there will be more 5% higher than its original price. In this place, the companies who get the ecological certification will not make them lost market. This refutes the point in the passage that lower price will make the product more attractive rather than the obtaining ecocertification does.

Furthermore, the professor makes the point that pursuing a eccocertification for the American wood company is to keep ability to compete with the International foreign wood companies. Obiviously, if the American company could not capture the domestic market as quickly as they can, the International wood company would flood into the market by selling the ecological product. While the passage, on the contrary, indicates a conflicting statement that American wood companies would not make sense for attaining a certification because they do need to occupy the global market.

小心littleheartUID: 2726034

tpo7   

In brief（总觉得这个词不应该用在开头，一般用在末段，总结全文用的~）, the speaker in the listening argues that there are a great many reasons for American company to receive the ecocertification for their wood product, eventually（这里有转折之意吧~however）, which cast doubt on the author's point in the passage that the wood company would（not） do the same way like the foreign International Company to adopt this new practice receiving the certification.  (文章说，世界范围内有很多木材公司采取了系列措施去获得认证，然而美国的公司不会采取同样的做法，然后作者给出三条理由, 所以不知道楼主是笔误还是理解错了，前面没有加not)$ G, V. J+ ~/ y1 v( ?

First of all, in the listening, the professor maintains that the consumer in American would have much more confident in the advertisement made by independent certification agencies rather than the claim made by their own company. Clearly, the Americans have a great concern on the ecological issue. Thus, they will give a warm welcome to the wood company who has received the ecocertification.
This standpoint disagrees with the testimony demonstrated in the reading that consumers in American do not trust in advertising claims in general.（这段写的很好，表达的不错，细节也全~学习了~！）
8 Q  H* V$ [4 J! F
Besides, according to the lecture, a study shows that price is the priority to care about when its too much high or low for consumers. Actually, after receiving the eccocertification, there will be（no） more 5% higher than its original price. （原文中说的是less than,相当于no more than）In this place, the companies who get the ecological certification will not make them lost market. This refutes the point in the passage that lower price will make the product more attractive rather than the obtaining ecocertification does.

Furthermore, the professor makes the point that pursuing a ecocertification for the American wood company is to keep ability to compete with the International foreign wood companies. Obiviously, if the American company could not capture the domestic market as quickly as they can, the International wood company would flood into the market by selling the ecological product. While the passage, on the contrary, indicates a conflicting（conflicted） statement that American wood companies would not make sense for attaining a certification because they do need to occupy the global market.

总体来说，海盗同学写得很不错，尤其是观点的准确性和细节，真让我学习了~~语言个别有一些小问题~在上面已经注明了~呵呵~加油~