03的 独立写作 练习帖（欢迎走过路过的拍两下）

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

这样我就有信心多了。谢谢鼓励！之前我还在为17分的作文成绩而郁闷呢~~
我现在在准备GMAT的issue,我先加强用词和造句的能力。

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

问一个问题，国宝同学，你是怎么这么做到对那些句子和用词做到如此细致的了解和运用的呢？你是怎么练得作文的呢？

mpromanusUID: 2565872

这个，你要我说方法，除了平时要多留心词句的语境，多读多写，剩下的就是唯手熟而。。=.= 至于词汇搭配的要义，可以从字典中学习，要英英字典，很多时候从释义的方式就可以看出一个词应该如何搭配。。比如我个人喜欢的www.m-w.com韦氏在线。。

从大的方向来说，像我签名档里那句培根论读写的话，是很有深意的：

Reading maketh a full man; 读书使人充实，
conference a ready man; 讨论使人机智，
and writing an exact man. 笔记使人准确。

也即 读 是积累知识，论 是锻炼思维，写 则是确认自己的知识和思维明晰无误。我一直是以这样的指导思想来对待议论文的，光读不写会积累错误的认知，光写不读会原地踏步，所以要两手进步~

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

嗯，谢谢国宝同学，我一定好好努力~~~

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

3月5号 (08.2.2)
Most people prefer having other people make decisions for them rather than making decisions by themselves。

We should admit that people tent to make more decisions than before. Facing so many decisions, some individuals have other people, such as some adiviors, make decisions for them. Do most people really love to have other people make decisions for them instead of making decisions by themselves? From my perspective, I totally disagree with the opinion.

In the first place, it is defficult for other people to make approprate decisions for us. Other people can not fully understand the situations we have faced, which is the key to analyze circumstance and make most beneficial decisions. For example, most college students' majors are chosen by their parents. But not a few students think that their majors are not best suit for them. Why this case happens? I believe that it is because parents have not well known what their chilren want or they are good at, in other words they misunderstand their children's true situation, that makes parents have made failure decisions for their children.  

In the second place, having other people make decisons is always most people's last choice. Suppose you have to make a decision about which company you shoud invest and you ask a financial advisor to make decision for you, you have to tell the advior your job, your income and your expection of interest, or even tell him your famliy members private stuff. At last you have also pay considerable money. At leat for me I can not bear my privacy exposing to others and also pay them much money just for making decision. In addition, having others make decisions for them means that they have not ability to handle their own stuff. I think it would hurt confident people's feelings.  If I can make decision by myself, I would not ask their make decisions for me. So I assert that it is most peole's last choice to have other people make decisions for them.

Of course having others make decisions can save us a lot time and energy. But we can not forget that others, like some advisors, would not be responsible for the bad results that are caused by their decisons and they would not put their heart into doing the decisons like ourselves. Even though you ask your family members or your friends for help who take the decisions seriously and try their best to make decisons for you, you definitely own them a lot and since they have limited knowledge and experience, you may not get the best result.
All in all, with all the elements discussed above I insist that majority people do not prefer to have others make decisions for them. If they have to do so, it is their last choice.

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

国宝同学，我换成29楼的行不？ 辛苦了~~~

3月5号 (08.2.2)
Most people prefer having other people make decisions for them rather than making decisions by themselves。

We should admit that people tent to make more decisions than before. Facing so many decisions, some individuals have other people, such as some advisors, their friends or family members, make decisions for them. Do most people really love to have other people make decisions for them instead of making decisions by themselves? From my perspective, I totally disagree with the opinion.

In the first place, it is difficult for other people to make appropriate decisions for us. Other people can not fully understand the situations we have faced, which is the key to analyze circumstance and make most beneficial decisions. For example, most college students' majors are chosen by their parents. But not a few students think that their majors are not best suit for them. Why this case happens? I believe that it is because parents have not well known what their children want or what their children are good at, in other words they misunderstand their children's true situation, that makes parents have made failure decisions for their children. So asking other people to make decisions for us has risk and I think most people do not like to do this.

In the second place, having other people make decisions is always most people's last choice. Suppose that you have to make a decision about which company you should invest and you ask a financial advisor to make decision for you, you have to tell the advisor your job, your income and your expectation of interest, or even tell the advisor your family members’ private stuff. At last you have also pay considerable money for this kind of serve. At least for me I can not bear my privacy exposing to others and also pay them much money just for making decision. In addition, having others make decisions for them means that they have not ability to handle their own stuff. I think it would hurt pride people's feelings.  If I can make decision by myself, I would not ask their make decisions for me. So I assert that it is most people’s last choice to have other people make decisions for them if they have to do so.

Of course having others make decisions can save us a lot time and energy. But we can not forget that others, like some advisors, would not be responsible for the bad results that are caused by their decisions and they would not put their heart into doing the decisions like ourselves. Even though you ask your family members or your friends for help who take the decisions seriously and try their best to make decisions for you, you definitely will own them a lot and since they have limited knowledge and experience, you may not get the best result.

All in all, with all the elements discussed above I insist that majority people do not prefer to have others make decisions for them. If they have to ask others to make decisions fro them, it must be their last choice.

hulinlin24UID: 2731389

加油33.。。。。。500+字啊。。。佩服佩服

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

囧，不知不觉写到500+了。其实还是短点好哇~~

rjyuuUID: 2591508

23# happyfaith2008
by 瓜仔

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

多谢UU和瓜仔

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

3.6
老同学辛苦了，我交得有点晚~~~囧

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

老同学辛苦了~~

3月6号 (08.3.2)
by 03
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.

Do you like to travel in a group? When I face this question, I have not hesitation to say "absolutely." I believe that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.

In the first place, it is very convenient for travelers to travel in a group led by a tour guide. With the serve of a tour guide, visitors have no need to worry the transportation and accommodation. Visitors always have no idea about the circumstance in their destination, especially for a long trip. Suppose that you are a traveler and you want to visit Pairs thousand miles away from your home, even if you have come to Paris, you may not know all the information about which travel path and transportation is the most appropriate for you and which hotel is comfortable and not expensive. However, a tour guide with much experience can provide such information for you and you can just happily enjoy your trip. It is indeed quite convenient for tourists to travel in a group led by a tour guide.

In the second place, travelling in a group led by a tour guide provides travelers much more fun. In a trip, we can not avoid spending long time in transportation. During such time, if we travel alone, we would easily feel lonely and boring. While, in a travel group you can have a happy talk with your group members to kill your time or listen to the tour guide telling some interesting stories on the transportation. That would be a happy time instead of a bored one. In addition, the tour guide knows more about the culture and customs in the place we want to visit. We can choose our favorite local activities to participate, since the tour guide can give us advice, and totally enjoy ourselves in the trip. So we can get more fun if we are in a group led by a tour guide.

Of course we should admit that in a travel group tourists have less free time and have to pay extra expense for the tour guide. But if we travel alone, we may spend more time and money on unnecessary transportation or miss some beautiful landscapes or interesting activities without tour guide's guide and suggestion.

In sum, comparing the disadvantages with the advantages discussed above, we can draw the conclusion that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. At least for me, I would love to choose a travel agency and enjoy the travel in a group led by a tour guide.

glly7UID: 2675646

呵呵，你看下有什么问题，可以交流交流
3.6 amendment

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

修改的同学辛苦了~~~

3.7 Human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals.

The topic about usage of land, recently, becomes very hot. With the growing number of endangered animals, some individuals believe that saving land for endangered animals is much more essential than human needs for farmland, housing, and industry. However, from my perspective, I disagree with this opinion.

In the first place, there are serious problems caused by the shortage of land for farming, housing, and industry. We should admit that there are thousands of people suffering starvation, and lack of lodging and jobs in the world, especially after a disaster like the serious earthquake in China at 2008. Human needs farmland to generate more grain and corn to supply those people in famine. Human needs land to construct more housing for the people in bleak. Human also needs land to build industry areas to provide more jobs for unemployed people. With so many serious problems need to be solved by using land, how can we just be blind to these and care about saving land for endangered animals?

In the second place, we save land for endangered animals to protect them from extinction. But can we really slow down the increasing number of endangered animals by saving land for them? I do not think so. We all know that there are so many factors to influence the survival of those endangered animals. Some animals will die out just because they do not adapt to the changing climate. Also, some animals will disappear on the earth because of the shortage of food. Just saving land for those endangered animals can not help to protect those animals from dying out. Instead it will be a waste of land if we save land for those endangered animals.

Of course, we should admit the fact that human's requirement of land has occupied many animals' habitat. But at most time human beings take those animals to some other better places to live, such as some national parks, where those animals can get a good protection. In addition, giving up the need for farmland, housing, and industry and saving land for endangered animals means giving up those poor starve people's right to survive. That is not what we want to see. In sum, human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals.

makeithappenUID: 2585223

The topic about usage of land, recently, becomes very hot (heating要好些 hot有些奇怪). With the growing number of endangered animals, some individuals believe that saving land for endangered animals is much more essential than human needs for farmland, housing, and industry. However, from my perspective, I disagree with this opinion.

In the first place, there are serious problems caused by the shortage of land for farming, housing, and industry. We should admit that there are thousands of people suffering starvation, and lack of lodging and jobs in the world, especially after a disaster like the serious earthquake in China at 2008.赞细节，我怎么写不了这么好的句子呢。。背下背下 Human needs farmland to generate more grain and corn to supply those people in famine. Human needs land to construct more housing for the people in bleak. Human also needs land to build industry areas to provide more jobs for unemployed people. With so many serious problems need to be solved by using land, how can we just be blind to these and care about saving land for endangered animals?

In the second place, we save land for endangered animals to protect them from extinction. But can we really slow down the increasing number of endangered animals by saving land for them? I do not think so. We all know that there are so many factors to influence the survival of those endangered animals. Some animals will die out just because they do not adapt to the changing climate. Also, some animals will disappear on the earth because of the shortage of food. Just saving land for those endangered animals can not help to protect those animals from dying out. Instead it will be a waste of land if we save land for those endangered animals.

Of course, we should admit the fact that human's requirement of land has occupied many animals' habitat. But at most time human beings take those animals to some other better places to live, such as some national parks, where those animals can get a good protection. In addition, giving up the need for farmland, housing, and industry and saving land for endangered animals means 改成mean因为前面有and giving up those poor starve 改成 starving people's right to survive. That is not what we want to see. In sum, human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals.


加油比我写得强很多。。我写得都有些思维混乱了logic好