- 最后登录
- 2022-6-21
- 在线时间
- 642 小时
- 寄托币
- 3272
- 声望
- 878
- 注册时间
- 2010-1-4
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 65
- 精华
- 9
- 积分
- 1436
- UID
- 2745492
  
- 声望
- 878
- 寄托币
- 3272
- 注册时间
- 2010-1-4
- 精华
- 9
- 帖子
- 65
|
发表于 2010-2-18 21:37:07
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 紫陌纤尘o0 于 2010-2-18 23:57 编辑
TOPIC: ISSUE190 - "As long as people in a society are hungry or out of work or lack the basic skills needed to survive, the use of public resources to support the arts is inappropriate-and, perhaps, even cruel-when one considers all the potential uses of such money."
WORDS: 519
TIME: 00:43:26
DATE: 2010/2/16 12:03:45
To the nature of human beings, all the things we always do are based on the sufficient of material needs for survive. In this case, under this fundamental level the use of public resource to support the arts seems to be inappropriate. However, it is not absolute but a relative term. It depends on how many people would benefit from the investment.
On the one hand, if in a society arts are regarded as a group of individuals’ entertainment and neglect the majorities’ lives, this would be cruel and even devil. Fundamentally, arts are the reflection of artists’ creativity and their remarkable skills. And people who appreciate artworks usually pursue mental improvement or maybe enjoyment. For instance, the Chinese first emperor Qin Shi Huang, who labored millions of people to build a wonderful palace called Epang Palace, which was destroyed by a superior riser soon after the emperor dead. The palace was full of valuable art works, such as famous paintings, lively statues, elegant ceramics, moreover, there were thousands of beauties and the palace itself is a splendid architecture. The emperor and bureaucrats were addicted to these arts all day long and enjoying their wonderful lives, meanwhile, the labors were dead of fatigue, starve and physical suffer. This case of investing on arts was inappropriate, for it aim to sufficient the few leaders at the sacrifice of millions lives let alone the huge amount money it had spent. A society should basically ensure that all its people have the possibility to survival, have the opportunity to pursue them own lives rather than provide convinces to the greedy minority, and then following after the spiritual pursuits such as arts maybe reasonable.
On the other hand, the effective usage of arts may bring a significant rise in profits to a society. The basic project of arts is always to attract people’s attention. If a society could take good use of the potential of arts which unique to them, then the money spend on arts is the money spends on developments. The architecture, for instance, is a significant branch of arts which most likely to have an influence on a certain place. Dubai is one of the seven emirates of the United Arab Emirates
at the beginning of 21 century, the government's decision to diversify from a trade-based, but oil-reliant, economy to one that is service and tourism-oriented has made property more valuable. The construction of some of the tallest skyscrapers and largest projects in the world such as the Emirates Towers, the Burj Khalifa, the Palm Islands and the world's second tallest, and most expensive hotel, the Burj Al Arab have attracted many investments from the whole world and Dubai has became the world’s largest financial centre. Each of these constructions is a splendid artistical project in the world. Although the economics of Dubai before that was in a relevant low level, the supporting of arts has achieved great success. In this case, arts could be a profitable industry under the wise policy. Accordingly, the use of money should look forward, plan its blueprint and take every potential possibility into consideration rather than merely for the temporary sufficiency.
In conclusion, the supporting of arts for the good of the minority or the majority amount of people could be where the rub is. The use of pubic resource to support arts sometimes can be a good way to help citizens who suffer in poverty out. |
|