Phoenix 11号 issue56

xusichuangUID: 2653998

56"Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."

What the author presented with us make us thinking how government should do in solving today’s problems and that of the future. Generally speaking, a government should do as Abraham Lincoln once put it: of the people, by the people, and for the people. As long as the problem concerns about people’s welfare, government should try to solve it, no matter it is short term immediate or long term anticipated. However, just as the newly elected president Brack Obama said to its people: You know that a government can not solve all the problems. Sometimes choices must made to reach a balance.
Immediate problems, including inflation, unemployment and bankruptcy, is urgent and deserves immediate action, otherwise, those problems will kill a country just as a severe disease kill a person. As we all know, an indifference attitude toward inflation will eventually cause hyperinflation and thus causing social unrest; increasing in unemployment will slow down the economy and the criminal rate will burgeon; bankruptcy is more urgent, because it will cause Domino Effect, making the financial system to break down. The recent financial crisis presented us with a good example. The year 2008 witnessed the worst financial crisis since 1929, causing severe oscillation in stock market and great economy slow down, with millions of people jobless. Bernanke, the tough president of Federal Reserve, make immediate decisions including instilling liquidity in the market and adjusting the interest rate. Thanks to his quick action, the market began to show a little optimism. In those situations, a government should make quick decision and take quick action, even if it will sacrifice a little in the long run. Those situations also include war, military conflict and terrorism.
However, in dealing with short term problems, a government has inclination to neglect a country’s anticipated future problems, which concerns about the ultimate welfare of the people. A most significant example is today’s pollution. When a government tries to the economy to boost, it will give permission to those firms which will do harm to the environment, even though sometime the government do not mean to do it. However, pollution is a haphazard thing that will greatly reduce the welfare of our future generations. Another case is about the over utilization of the resources of the earth. When a government cares too much about the short term output, it will use excessive resources which we should utilize properly and save enough for our future generations.
Sometimes, when dealing with social problems, a government falls into a dilemma. Wise government will make the right decision that will balance the immediate problems and anticipated future problems. A government should, on one side, take urgent actions when the problem is urgent and, on the other side, consider comprehensively about people’s future welfare.

NEU公孙轩辕UID: 2697609

Phoenix 11号 issue
56"Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."

What the author presented with us make us thinking how government should do in solving today’s problems and that of the future./The author's statement presents us a question that what government should do to solve the immediate problems and the anticipated ones. Generally speaking, a government should do as Abraham Lincoln once put it: of the people, by the people, and for the people. As long as the problem concerns about people’s welfare, government should try to solve it, no matter it is short term(删） immediate or long term(删） anticipated. However, just as the newly elected president Brack Obama said to its people/the public: You know that a government can not solve all the problems. Sometimes choices must made to reach a balance.

Immediate problems, including inflation, unemployment and bankruptcy, is/are urgent and deserves/deserve immediate action. Otherwise, those problems will kill a country just as a severe disease kill a person. As we all know, an indifference attitude toward inflation will eventually cause hyperinflation and thus causing social unrest. Increasing in unemployment will slow down the economy and the criminal rate will burgeon. bankruptcy is more urgent because it will cause Domino Effect, which making/makes the financial system to break down. The recent financial crisis presented/provides(推荐替换词） us with a good example. The year 2008 witnessed the worst financial crisis since 1929, causing severe oscillation in stock market and great economy slow down, with millions of people jobless. Bernanke, the tough president of Federal Reserve, make immediate decisions including instilling liquidity in the market and adjusting the interest rate. Thanks to his quick action, the market began to show a little optimism. （这里应该突出的是government, 而不是个人）In those situations, a government should make quick decision and take quick action/take effective measures at the first time, even if it will sacrifice a little in the long run. Those situations also include war, military conflict and terrorism.

However, in dealing with short term problems, a government has inclination to neglect a country’s anticipated future problems, which concerns about the ultimate welfare of the people. A most significant example is today’s pollution. When a government tries to the economy to boost/boost the economy, it will give permission to those firms which will do harm to the environment, even though sometime the government do not mean to do it.(这句话本身就前后矛盾，先说政府会给这些企业开绿灯，接着又说有些时候政府又是无意的.....请作者务必注意） However, pollution is a haphazard thing that will greatly reduce the welfare of our future generations. Another case is about the over utilization of the resources of the earth. When a government cares too much about the short term output, it will use excessive resources which we should utilize properly and save enough for our future generations.

Sometimes, when dealing with social problems,(具体指什么？不要让读者去猜你的意思...) a government falls into a dilemma. Wise government will make the right decision that will balance the immediate problems and anticipated future problems. A government should, on one side, take urgent actions when the problem is urgent and, on the other side, consider comprehensively about people’s future welfare.

只说一个问题：作者应该仔细思考题目，弄清楚这道题到底在说什么，整理好思路后在写。
                   1写的过程中请注意句子之间的逻辑关系，不要出现逻辑跳跃
                   2句子意思表达要明确完整，不要让读者去猜你的意思
加油！

missingusaUID: 2625832

请lz注意正确的发帖格式, 相关内容可以参考这个帖子:
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1042201

修改完后, 请通过站内短消息pm我一下, 谢谢^^