Phenix写作小组2号第八次作业

wu-intrepidUID: 2659758

ISSUE69 - "Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"


Although science brings about many benefits for our lives, the modern history also reveals that it causes numerous damages. In two Word Wars, for examples, millions of people died in the advanced weapons. It seems necessary to restricting on science, in order to decrease the destructions coursed by science. Yet, in fact, making this claim results from misunderstanding between using of science and science itself, may block the progress of human society.

First, since government is not a scientist. Government officers do not know relavant knowledge about science, and can not make right projects about the scientific development. Government regards science as a means of governing, and the aim of interfering is to make the consequence of scientific research support its dominion. Copernicus, for instance, who we still remember builds Heliocentric universe. The church (the church was as the government in that time) arrested this theory, due to its opposition the idea of governing,
and did not care it right or wrong. Thus, if the government has adequate power to interfere the scientific research, may decline the speed of the progress of science.

Further, the pace of science may not cease by the intervention of governments. Which may be ineffective and invalid, and the only consequence is making the scientific researches in their nations fall behind other countries. Such as the Bush, who makes policy to prohibit the research of embryonic stem cells, which has great potential in medicine area. For his affirmation, many scientists, who are specialized at this area, go to other countries to do this research. Now, the researches advance a lot in many countries, while not in American. Now, Obama abolish the restriction of this scientific research, in order to enhance the level of people health by using of the medicine effect of embryonic stem cells. Thus, the restriction of Bush just makes
this scientific research in America behind other countries, which do not be ended in the worldwide.

Government always claims what they interfere is only some unethical scientific researches. It seems that some applications of scientific researches are immoral， in the manufacture of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. However, it means some uses of science are unethical, not the science itself. For science is concerned with the facts, and facts in themselves have no moral meanings. It is the immoral uses of science that make the disasters to our lives, which are the true issues governments should interfere.

Therefore, governments should identity the distinction of use of scientific research and science itself. On this basis, hold an free attitude to scientific development, while intervene the unethical applications of the outcomes of scientific researches.

Jane114UID: 2681579

Although science brings about many benefits for our lives, the modern history also reveals that it causes numerous damages. In two Word Wars, for [color=Red]examples （example）, millions of people died in the advanced weapons. It seems necessary to restricting on science, in order to decrease the destructions coursed(caused) by science. Yet, in fact, making this claim results from misunderstanding between using of science and science itself, may block the progress of human society.

First, since government is not a scientist. Government officers do not know relavant(the relative) knowledge about science, and can not make right projects about(for) the scientific development. Government regards science as a means of(for) governing, and the aim of interfering is to make the consequence of scientific research support its dominion. Copernicus, for instance, who we still remember builds Heliocentric universe(这句话语法错了，主句没有动词). The church (the church was as the government in that time) arrested this theory, due to its opposition（it objects） the idea of governing, and did not care it (whether it is) right or wrong. Thus, if the government has adequate power to interfere the scientific research, may decline the speed of the progress of science.(我认为这个总结句应该突出“如果政府只是为了实现政治目的而约束科学研究就是错误”的这一观点)

Further, the pace of science may not cease(be ceased) by the intervention of governments. Which may be ineffective and invalid, and the only consequence is making the scientific researches in their nations fall behind other countries. Such as the(删) Bush, who makes policy to prohibit the research of embryonic stem cells, which has （a） great potential in medicine area(the medical area). For his affirmation, many scientists, who are specialized at this area, go to other countries to do this research. Now, the researches(this research) advance a lot in many countries, while not in American. Now, Obama abolish the restriction of this scientific research, in order to enhance the level of people’s health by using of(删) the medicine effect of embryonic stem cells. Thus, the restriction of Bush just makes this scientific research in America behind other countries, which do not be ended in the worldwide.（反例举美国的不太好吧）

Government always claims what they interfere is only some unethical scientific researches. It seems that some applications of scientific researches are immoral， in（like） the manufacture of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. However, it means some uses of science are unethical, not the science itself. For science is concerned with the facts, and facts in（删） themselves have no moral meanings. It is the immoral uses of science that make the disasters to our lives, which are the true issues governments should interfere.（这段写的好）

Therefore, governments should identity（identify） the distinction of （between the） use of scientific research and science itself. On this basis, ( Based on this, government should) hold an free attitude to scientific development, while intervene the unethical applications of the outcomes of scientific researches.
作者逻辑分析能力很强，而且知识面很广，所以分析和举例是你的强项。但是语言不太流畅是美中瑕疵，注意下语法，你定能写出很有深度的高分作文。