本帖最后由 zachary19891018 于 2010-3-1 12:25 编辑
Nowadays, whether a government should place any restrictions on scientific research and development has become a hot issue. I agree with the author’s opinion insofar as scientific research and development should be in a relatively free environment(under a relatively free circumstance是否更好？). However, negative effects would occur and jeopardize our society if no restrictions are placed on it(it你是指代什么呢？).
If scientist knows that he can make his research in a free way, he will be more focused on the research itself and will naturally contribute more to the development of the scientific field that he dedicated in. More importantly, we know that collaboration plays a vital role in scientific research and development. A free environment will enhance the collaboration, making their opinions and ideas to exchange easily and providing a more convenient way to share others’ results.
On the opposite, however, excessive restriction is not good and will impede scientific research and its development. If too much restriction（many restrictions） were placed on some scientific research say economic, when carrying their research, economist would think: Will this result be accepted by the authority? Does this result reveal something that the government does not want to be making known? They will definitely hesitate before their researching result considering “should I publish it?” even though it might be a valuable research. Excessive government restriction is like shackle, locking researchers' thoughts. On the other hand, we know that some huge projects can not be finished by one single person or even one country. Take the “human genetic project” which was carried out by 7 different countries as an example. Consider, if the seven countries place much restriction(many restrictions) on this research, there would be little international collaborating(collaboration), and thus progress would be much slower.
Even though a relatively free environment is needed, it does not mean we do not need any restrictions. Restrictions made by the government, if placed properly, can avoid scientific research and development from deviating from its normal track that will benefit the society. Historically, when gun was invented, it comes naturally that different people use this weapon for different purpose. Some use it to defend their homeland while others use it to kill the innocent. Until now, the research on weapons is the most tightly restricted scientific field by the government(这个例子你要说明一下如果对枪支不限制会有什么后果，不然对你的论证没有支持). Another example concerns the recent development of cloning. A sheep and a pig were reported to be cloned. If the government leave cloning uncontrolled, as the cloning technology develops, we would expect human being to be cloned. After more and more people’s duplication(If more and more people were cloned这里用个虚拟语气是否更好？) in an unrestricted way, the society would be in a mess. Similarly, restrictions should also be placed on those scientific fields such as the studying of virus, nuclear and tissue transplantation.
Moreover, as scientific research develops in an international way, it is also the governments’ duty to cooperate in how to properly restrict the research and its development. In this way, scientific research can develop in a smooth and healthy way that will benefit all human beings.
It seems that the government falls into a dilemma. Firstly, a relatively free environment is necessary. Secondly, （in order ）to avoid scientific research and development’s negative effects, properly(proper) restriction is also needed. What really need wisdom and courage as a government is how to make a balance between the two.
评价：
以我的水平来看 作者写的还是很不错的 ，逻辑很清晰， 就是要多用一些复合句，句子要注意长短结合，还有就是最后第二段有点单薄，这段是作者思想的升华，如果多加一些论证，例子会更好。
| 
发表于 2010-2-23 17:03:17
签到领寄托币
GO
转发
