- 最后登录
- 2021-2-22
- 在线时间
- 4673 小时
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 声望
- 762
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 907
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 6161
- UID
- 2565872
 
- 声望
- 762
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 907
|
6# eejchen
Nowadays, along with the increasingly important international connection? (I'm not sure what are you trying to express but I guess you mean something like 'relationships between nations'.), people are becoming much more concerned about not only their own country, but also foreign countries. Therefore, they need to find some ways to learn about foreign countries. Some people believe that newspapers and magazines are the best way, however, other people might hold the opposite opinion. From my point of view, newspapers and magazines are absolutely not the best way to get information about the world ('The world' doesn't seem to be equal with 'a foreign country'. To be more accurate, you might want to say something like 'other nations in the world'.).
First of all, there are a large numbers of methods to know what happened all over the world, like the TV programs and the Internet. Newspapers and magazines do provide much information about the domestic and foreign countries (I meant to remove the 'the' but on a second thought I realized this is not just about that 'the'. There's no such thing like a 'domestic country', because 'domestic' means 'within one's own country', and what is 'a country that's wihin one's own country'? It's either 'domestic and foreign affairs', or 'native and foreign countries'.) for many years, especially twenty years ago, when other forms of medias were not improved to become so popular. Nonetheless, we live in the 21th century, the information age, when people are can access to information much more easily than before. People can watch the TV programs to know the information all over the world as soon as the incidents happened (You keep using 'the' without specifying what exactly 'the incidents' or 'the information' is. Remember that the definite article 'the' should only be used to SPECIFY a particular instance of a noun. Without this specification, you shouldn't use 'the'. Plus, it seems like you meant to say 'People...to get to know...' rather than 'to know'.). Take Barrack Obama (It is very vital that when you refer to a person of status for the first time, you do so with his full title ['President Obama'], or his full name. In formal occasions, referring to people for the first time by their last names alone without proper designations like Sir or Mr., would be extremely impolite.), the man who was elected to be President of the United States for example: there was an live broadcast (Of what? His candidate speech?) on TV. Therefore, people in my country knew the news very quickly. This efficiency cannot be obtained matched by newspapers and magazines.
In addition, people can go abroad to have a nice trip and learn about a foreign country. It provides an vivid impression of the country to them. Before I came to Atlanta, I cannot imagine that the sky is so blue in a sunny day and the majority of people here are so nice. I learn about people's lifestyle here and make some good international friends. I cannot imagine all of these experiences if i just stay at my country and read the newspapers and magazines. No doubt that being there is a good way to learn about a foreign country. (Good point. This is exactly the kind of examples that ETS exmainers would like. You could afford be more specific about what exactly you learned about 'lifestyle' in Atlanta but was not able to know back at your own country. That would really hit the point, and would be a good chance to show off your langauge too.)
From what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that although reading newspapers and magazines are good ways to learn about a foreign country, there are many better ways to know about other countries and people there. (You need to get back to the question..like, 'therefore newspapers and magazines are definitely not the best ways to learn about a foreign country.' I understand this might look redundant, but that's the kind of 'beacons' that your examiners look for when they have limited time and must quickly construct a relatively complete idea about your essay. In other words, the examiners won't have much luxury to read between the lines, so I always maintain that your position on the question needs to be very clearly and directy stated.)
总结:
这篇总体水平相当好,说理和语言都做得不错。有一些用词方面需要注意的地方都在文章中指出了。
我觉得你现在句子的流畅程度控制得非常不错,接下来可以再继续多尝试一些表现力强的词汇,增加你的文采~ |
-
总评分: 声望 + 1
查看全部投币
|