Issue43 有拍必回！

LaoZZZZZUID: 2747300

To be an effective leader,a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.


Should public official must follow the highest ethical and moral criteria in order to be an effective leader,as the speaker asserts?I share the idea with speaker that public official diregarding the restraints of ethics and morality will undoubtly reuslt in his down-fall sooner or later,let alone to be an effective leader. Nevertheless,whether the moral standards of being an effective leader is doomed to be the highest deserves all-compassing and deep consideration.
In the realm of politics,the leader who maitains the highest ethical and moral criteria may not qualified for his position,since the ultimate obligation of a politician is not to conduct as an moral model but to build,maitain,and expand the wealth ,prosperity and political influence of his nation,district,country.And history is fraught with  examples in point.Bill Clinton - a graceful speaker-had a remarkable ability to connect with people,which enabled him to withhold the blow of impeachment resulted from the improper relationship with a White House intern.During his presidency,the country enjoyed the longest period of economic growth in its hitory,which won him the highest voter approval rating of all modern presidents when he left office.Futher more,even an cursory review of the private lives of past presidents reveals substantial evidence that Franklin Roosevel,Dwight Esenhower,Lyndon Johson and John Kenedy had extramarital affairs during their presidency.In additon,Confucius who is viewed as the authoritative model of Chinese ethics and morality,was not nominated as an officer by any emperor and untimately failed to fulfill his ambition of being an great politician.With respect to this aspect,to be an effective leader doesnot mean retaining the highest ethical and moral standards.Yet the ability of improving the well-being of his nation and internatinal influence of his country is undoubtly the most improtant factor.
Notwithstanding,contempt for the restaint of morality and ethics will unevitably result in the down-fall of public official.Less people will protest that an underhanded politician who is engage in bribe,sexual scandal and so forth could hardly fullfill his real obligation,let alone to be an effective leader.An remarkable example is President Nixon who is cheaf plotter of Watergate -- the designation of a major United States Political scandal that began with the burglary and wiretapping of the his opponents and culminated in the first resignation of a U.S.president.So,empirical evidence tells us that ethical and moral criteria of an politician may be not the highest yet must be in accordance of the demands of public.
To sum up,as the foregoing discussions,the ethical and moral criteria of an effective politician is not necessary the highest yet must meet the demands of public.What's more,the prerequisite of being an effective leader,in my observation,is the ability of improving the well-being and international status of his nation rather than the highest ehical and moral standards.

prettywraithUID: 197049

To be an effective leader,a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.


Should public official must follow the highest ethical and moral criteria in order to be an effective leader, as the speaker asserts? I share the idea with speaker that public official diregarding the restraints of ethics and morality will undoubtly reuslt in his down-fall sooner or later, let alone to be an effective leader. Nevertheless, whether the moral standards of being an effective leader is doomed to be the highest deserves all-compassing and deep consideration.（疑问句开头，然后转折表达观点，唯一缺点有几个单词拼写错误）

In the realm of politics, the leader who maitains the highest ethical and moral criteria may not qualified（may后面接原形） for his position, since the ultimate obligation of a politician is not to conduct as an moral model but to build, maitain, and expand the wealth ,prosperity and political influence of his nation, district, （加and或者or）country. And history is fraught with examples in point. Bill Clinton - a graceful speaker-had a remarkable ability to connect with people, which enabled him to withhold the blow of impeachment resulted from the improper relationship with a White House intern. During his presidency, the country enjoyed the longest period of economic growth in its hitory, which won him the highest voter approval rating of all modern presidents when he left office. Futher more, ven an cursory review of the private lives of past presidents reveals substantial evidence that Franklin Roosevel, Dwight Esenhower, Lyndon Johson and John Kenedy had extramarital affairs during their presidency. In additon, Confucius who is viewed as the authoritative model of Chinese ethics and morality, was not nominated as an officer by any emperor and untimately failed to fulfill his ambition of being an great politician. With respect to this aspect, to be an effective leader does not mean retaining the highest ethical and moral standards. Yet the ability of improving the well-being of his nation and internatinal influence of his country is undoubtly the most improtant factor. （孔子的例子是要说明有道德人可能得不到重用？这里要注意两个地方，第一，如果是的话，in addition最好换成“相反”，这样好像更符合逻辑；第二，这个例子和能否成为杰出领导不一定相关，因为拒绝他的想法的也都不是什么杰出领袖，注意本文谈的是杰出的leader）

Notwithstanding, contempt for the restaint of morality and ethics will unevitably result in the down-fall of public official. Less people will protest that an underhanded politician who is engage in bribe, sexual scandal and so forth could hardly fullfill his real obligation, let alone to be an effective leader. An remarkable example is President Nixon who is cheaf plotter of Watergate -- the designation of a major United States Political scandal that began with the burglary and wiretapping of the his opponents and culminated in the first resignation of a U.S.president. So, empirical evidence tells us that ethical and moral criteria of an（a） politician may be not the highest yet must be in accordance of（with） the demands of public.（尼克松的例子，别人我也看到过，我觉得一方面是伦理道德问题，但是主要我觉得还是一个违法的问题；另外前面列举的贪污，性丑闻等等，如果举Nixon的例子最好再加上一个欺骗，这样能对应起来）

To sum up, as the foregoing discussions, the ethical and moral criteria of an effective politician is not necessary the highest yet（yet是副词，这里需要换一个） must meet the demands of public. What's more, the prerequisite of being an effective leader, in my observation, is the ability of improving the well-being and international status of his nation rather than the highest ehical and moral standards.

文章观点比较清楚，论据充分，但是语言需要再修改一下，此外错别字多了点。

LaoZZZZZUID: 2747300

Should public official must follow the highest ethical and moral criteria in order to be an effective leader,as the speaker asserts?I share the idea with speaker that public official disregarding the restraints of ethics and morality will undoubtedly result in his down-fall sooner or later,let alone to be an effective leader. Nevertheless,whether the moral standards of being an effective leader is doomed to be the highest deserves all-compassing and deep consideration.

In the realm of politics, the leader who maintains the highest ethical and moral criteria may not be qualified for his position, since the ultimate obligation of a politician is not to conduct as an moral model but to build, maintain, and expand the wealth ,prosperity and political influence of his nation, district, country. And history is fraught with examples in point .Bill Clinton - a graceful speaker-had a remarkable ability to connect with people, which enabled him to withhold the blow of impeachment resulted from the improper relationship with a White House intern. During his presidency, the country enjoyed the longest period of economic growth in its history, which won him the highest voter approval rating of all modern presidents when he left office. Further more, even an cursory review of the private lives of past presidents reveals substantial evidence that Franklin Roosevelt ,Dwight Esenhower, Lyndon Johson and John Kennedy had extramarital affairs during their presidency. In the contrast, Confucius who is viewed as the authoritative model of Chinese ethics and morality, was not nominated as an officer by any emperor and ultimately failed to fulfill his ambition of being an great politician. With respect to this aspect, to be an effective leader does not mean retaining the highest ethical and moral standards. Yet the ability of improving the well-being of his nation and international influence of his country is undoubtedly the most important factor.

Notwithstanding, contempt for the restraint of morality and ethics will inevitably result in the down-fall of public official. Less people will protest that an underhanded politician who revolves in bribe, sexual scandal ,deceit and so forth could hardly fulfill his real obligation, let alone to be an effective leader. An remarkable example is President Nixon who is chief plotter of Watergate -- the designation of a major United States Political scandal that began with the burglary and wiretapping of the his opponents and culminated in the first resignation of a U.S. president. So, empirical evidence tells us that ethical and moral criteria of an politician may be not the highest yet must be in accordance of the demands of public.

To sum up, as the foregoing discussions, the ethical and moral criteria of an effective politician is not necessary the highest yet must meet the demands of public. What's more, the prerequisite of being an effective leader, in my observation, is the ability of improving the well-being and international status of his nation rather than the highest ethical and moral standards.